The impact of carbon tax policy on residents' welfare of China and its heterogeneity under the carbon neutrality goal: A CGE model-based analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Zhang, Yangyi [1 ]
Chi, Yuanying [1 ]
Li, Guozheng [1 ]
Zhang, Xufeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon neutrality constraints; Welfare of residents; Dynamic CGE model; Carbon tax; FUZZY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140442
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the background that China will achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2060, analyzing the impact of carbon neutral target constraints on the welfare of urban and rural residents is an important part of the design of a carbon emission reduction policy mechanism, in this paper, the dynamic recursive CGE(Computable general equilibrium) model is used to simulate the changes in welfare level, income consumption, and CO2 emissions of residents and their urban-rural heterogeneity under the policy of imposing a carbon tax on the fossil energy industry from 2022 to 2060. The results show that: compared with the BAU scenario, by 2060, first the income and consumption of residents will decrease slightly. Second, the target constraint of carbon neutrality makes the equivalent variation and compensate variation of urban and rural residents' welfare decrease slightly, and the equivalent variation and compensate variation of urban residents decrease more than those of rural residents. The following conclusions are drawn: first, the carbon-neutral target constraint makes the welfare of urban and rural residents decline slightly, but it will not have a strong impact on residents' income and consumption. Second, this constraint has a greater impact on the income, consumption and savings of urban residents than those of rural residents.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility Study of China's Carbon Tax System under the Carbon Neutrality Target-Based on the CGE Model
    Gao, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Yuhao
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (02)
  • [2] THE IMPACT OF THE ENERGY TRANSITION ON CHINA’S ECONOMY UNDER THE CARBON PEAKING AND CARBON NEUTRALITY GOALS A Simulation Analysis Based on the CGE Model
    Lu, Yachen
    Dai, Jiaquan
    Wang, Lining
    Liu, Yu
    Wu, Chunfang
    Thermal Science, 2022, 26 (5 Part A): : 4043 - 4056
  • [3] Would carbon tax be an effective policy tool to reduce carbon emission in China? Policies simulation analysis based on a CGE model
    Xu, Jin
    Wei, Weixian
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 54 (01) : 115 - 134
  • [4] Synergistic effect of emission trading scheme and carbon tax: A CGE model-based study in China
    Jia, Zhijie
    Wen, Shiyan
    Wu, Rongxin
    Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2025, 110
  • [5] The Pathway to China's Carbon Neutrality Based on an Endogenous Technology CGE Model
    Liang, Shuang
    Lin, Xinyue
    Liu, Xiaoxue
    Pan, Haoran
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (10)
  • [6] A Comprehensive Analysis of CGE Model-based Energy Policy of China
    Ke, Zong
    Yuan, Yuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, EDUCATION MANAGEMENT AND SPORTS EDUCATION, 2015, 39 : 1057 - 1060
  • [7] ANALYSIS OF CARBON EMISSION INTENSITY AND ITS IMPACT ON RESIDENTS' HEALTH IN LIUPANSHUI CITY UNDER THE VISION OF "CARBON NEUTRALITY"
    Deng, Chaoyan
    Dai, Chunyan
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (30) : 11 - 11
  • [8] The Goal of Carbon Peaking, Carbon Emissions, and the Economic Effects of China's Energy Planning Policy: Analysis Using a CGE Model
    Hu, Haisheng
    Dong, Wanhao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [9] The Impact of Carbon Market and Carbon Tax on Green Growth Pathway in China: A Dynamic CGE Model Approach
    Bi, Huimin
    Xiao, Hao
    Sun, Kejuan
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2019, 55 (06) : 1312 - 1325
  • [10] Cap and Trade Versus Carbon Tax: An Analysis Based on a CGE Model
    Jin-Feng Zhou
    Dan Wu
    Wei Chen
    Computational Economics, 2022, 59 : 853 - 885