The PrU: Development and validation of a measure to assess personal utility of genomic results

被引:18
|
作者
Turbitt, Erin [1 ,9 ]
Kohler, Jennefer N. [2 ]
Angelo, Frank [3 ]
Miller, Ilana M. [4 ]
Lewis, Katie L. [5 ]
Goddard, Katrina A. B. [6 ]
Wilfond, Benjamin S. [7 ]
Biesecker, Barbara B. [8 ]
Leo, Michael C.
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Grad Sch Hlth, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
[2] Stand Univ, Stanford Ctr Undiagnosed Dis, Stanford, CA USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med Social Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Childrens Natl Hosp, Rare Dis Inst, Washington, DC USA
[5] Natl Human Genome Res Inst, NIH, Bethesda, MD USA
[6] Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
[7] Seattle Childrens Hosp, Treuman Katz Ctr Pediat Bioeth, Seattle, WA USA
[8] Translat Res Program, Genom Ethics & RTI Int, Washington, DC USA
[9] Univ Technol Sydney, Grad Sch Hlth, Discipline Genet Counselling, Bldg 20,Level 6,100 Broadway,, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
ELSI; Health services evaluation; Patient -reported outcome measure; Perceived value; Psychometrics; CLINICAL UTILITY; CHALLENGES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.gim.2022.12.003
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose: People report experiencing value from learning genomic results even in the absence of clinically actionable information. Such personal utility has emerged as a key concept in genomic medicine. The lack of a validated patient-reported outcome measure of personal utility has impeded the ability to assess this concept among those receiving genomic results and evaluate the patient-perceived value of genomics. We aimed to construct and psychometrically evaluate a scale to measure personal utility of genomic results-the Personal Utility (PrU) scale. Methods: We used an evidence-based, operational definition of personal utility, with data from a systematic literature review and Delphi survey to build a novel scale. After piloting with 24 adults, the PrU was administered to healthy adults in a Clinical Sequencing Evidence -Generating Research Consortium study after receiving results. We investigated the responses using exploratory factor analysis. Results: The exploratory factor analysis (N = 841 participants) resulted in a 3-factor solution, accounting for 74% of the variance in items: (1) self-knowledge (alpha = 0.92), (2) reproductive planning (alpha = 0.89), and (3) practical benefits (alpha = 0.91). Conclusion: Our findings support the use of the 3-factor PrU to assess personal utility of genomic results. Validation of the PrU in other samples will be important for more wide-spread application. (c) 2022 by American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Parent PrU: A measure to assess personal utility of pediatric genomic results
    Turbitt, Erin
    Kohler, Jennefer N.
    Brothers, Kyle B.
    Outram, Simon M.
    Rini, Christine
    Sahin-Hodoglugil, Nuriye
    Leo, Michael C.
    Biesecker, Barbara B.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 26 (01)
  • [2] Development and Validation of Responses to Personal Mortality Measure
    Meistaite, Egle
    Pauli, Regina
    Cooper, Mick
    JOURNAL OF HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2023,
  • [3] Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening—negative results (CoG-NR)
    Gail E. Henderson
    Molly Ewing
    Kristine J. Kuczynski
    R. Jean Cadigan
    Margaret Waltz
    Rita M. Butterfield
    Christine Rini
    Karen Weck
    Jonathan S. Berg
    Teresa P. Edwards
    European Journal of Human Genetics, 2020, 28 : 1394 - 1402
  • [4] The Development and Validation of Three Types of Personal Relevance Measure
    Guo, Zhixing
    Fryer, Luke Kutszik
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2025,
  • [5] Development and validation of a measure of comprehension of genomic screening-negative results (CoG-NR)
    Henderson, Gail E.
    Ewing, Molly
    Kuczynski, Kristine J.
    Cadigan, R. Jean
    Waltz, Margaret
    Butterfield, Rita M.
    Rini, Christine
    Weck, Karen
    Berg, Jonathan S.
    Edwards, Teresa P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 28 (10) : 1394 - 1402
  • [6] The Rugged Resilience Measure: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Brief Measure of Personal Resilience
    Philip Jefferies
    Rena Vanstone
    Michael Ungar
    Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2022, 17 : 985 - 1000
  • [7] The Rugged Resilience Measure: Development and Preliminary Validation of a Brief Measure of Personal Resilience
    Jefferies, Philip
    Vanstone, Rena
    Ungar, Michael
    APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2022, 17 (02) : 985 - 1000
  • [8] Development and Initial Validation of a Measure to Assess Career Goal Feedback
    Hu, Shi
    Creed, Peter A.
    Hood, Michelle
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2017, 35 (07) : 657 - 669
  • [9] Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
    Bunnik, Eline M.
    Janssens, A. Cecile J. W.
    Schermer, Maartje H. N.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2015, 41 (04) : 322 - 326
  • [10] Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information
    Foster, Morris W.
    Mulvihill, John J.
    Sharp, Richard R.
    GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 11 (08) : 570 - 574