Contextual Decision-Making and Alcohol Use Disorder Criteria: Delayed Reward, Delayed Loss, and Probabilistic Reward Discounting

被引:4
|
作者
Acuff, Samuel F. [1 ]
Boness, Cassandra L. [2 ]
McDowell, Yoanna [3 ]
Murphy, James G. [1 ]
Sher, Kenneth J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Memphis, Dept Psychol, 202 Psychol Bldg, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Ctr Alcohol Subst Use & Addict, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[3] VA Puget Sound Hlth Care Syst, Seattle Div, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Univ Missouri, Dept Psychol Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
alcohol use disorder; behavioral economics; delayed reward discounting; heterogeneity; CHOICE; DRINKING; SELF;
D O I
10.1037/adb0000867
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is an etiologically heterogeneous psychiatric disorder defined by a collection of commonly observed co-occurring symptoms. It is useful to contextualize AUD within theoretical frameworks to identify potential prevention, intervention, and treatment approaches that target personalized mechanisms of behavior change. One theoretical framework, behavioral economics, suggests that AUD is a temporally extended pattern of cost/benefit analyses favoring drinking decisions. The distribution of costs and benefits across choice outcomes is often unequally distributed over time and has different probabilities of receipt, such that delay and probability become critical variables. The present study examines the relations between different forms of economic discounting (delayed reward, delayed cost, and probabilistic reward) and individual symptoms of AUD to inform etiological models. Method: Participants (N = 732; 41% female, 4.2% Black, 88.1% White, 8% Hispanic) completed an online survey with measures of AUD symptoms and economic discounting. We examined relations between economic discounting and AUD symptoms with zero-order correlations, in separate models (factor models), and in models controlling for an AUD factor (factor-controlled models). Results: Delayed reward discounting was positively associated with the give up AUD criteria across all three levels of analysis. Probability discounting was associated with social/interpersonal problems across two out of three sets of analyses. Consistent with the broad discounting literature, effect sizes were small (range = -.15 to .13). Conclusions: These results support the idea that AUD criteria are etiologically distinct, resulting in varying AUD profiles between persons that are differentially associated with behavioral economic discounting. Public Health Significance Statement Alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnoses, though common, are highly heterogeneous collections of commonly co-occurring symptoms that do not necessarily share common phenotypic variance. Behavioral economics suggests that discounting of losses and rewards across time and over different probabilities may account for some of the variance in specific AUD symptoms. The results of the present study support the notion that AUD diagnosis reflects heterogeneous symptoms and that delayed reward discounting, delayed loss discounting, and probability reward discounting may be useful endophenotypes for three AUD symptoms in particular: giving up, failure to fulfill, and social/interpersonal problems, providing potential treatment targets for these symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 131
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuroanatomical foundations of delayed reward discounting decision making
    Owens, Max M.
    Gray, Joshua C.
    Amlung, Michael T.
    Oshri, Assaf
    Sweet, Lawrence H.
    MacKillop, James
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 161 : 261 - 270
  • [2] Delayed-reward discounting in alcohol abuse
    Vuchinich, RE
    Simpson, CA
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ABUSE: AN INTEGRATION OF ECONOMETRIC AND BEHAVIORAL ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 1999, : 103 - 130
  • [3] Item-based analysis of delayed reward discounting decision making
    Gray, Joshua C.
    Amlung, Michael T.
    Acker, John D.
    Sweet, Lawrence H.
    MacKillop, James
    [J]. BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2014, 103 : 256 - 260
  • [4] Alcohol use and discounting of delayed and probabilistic gain and loss
    Takahashi, Taiki
    Ohmura, Yu
    Oono, Hidemi
    Radford, Mark
    [J]. NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 30 (06) : 749 - 752
  • [5] Alcohol Demand, Delayed Reward Discounting, and Craving in Relation to Drinking and Alcohol Use Disorders
    MacKillop, James
    Miranda, Robert, Jr.
    Monti, Peter M.
    Ray, Lara A.
    Murphy, James G.
    Rohsenow, Damaris J.
    McGeary, John E.
    Swift, Robert M.
    Tidey, Jennifer W.
    Gwaltney, Chad J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 119 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [6] UNDERSTANDING IMPULSIVITY AND ALCOHOL MISUSE VIA DELAYED REWARD DISCOUNTING
    MacKillop, J.
    Amlung, M.
    Pryor, L.
    Ray, L. A.
    Munafo, M.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 34 (08) : 18A - 18A
  • [7] Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes
    Green, L
    Myerson, J
    Ostaszewski, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1999, 25 (02) : 418 - 427
  • [8] STRUCTURAL BRAIN CORRELATES OF IMPULSIVE DELAYED REWARD DISCOUNTING IN ALCOHOL AND NICOTINE USE DISORDERS
    Amlung, M.
    Morris, V.
    Minuzzi, L.
    Bock, N.
    Sweet, L.
    MacKillop, J.
    [J]. ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 41 : 295A - 295A
  • [9] Neuroanatomical foundations of delayed reward discounting decision making II: Evaluation of sulcal morphology and fractal dimensionality
    McIntyre-Wood, Carly
    Madan, Christopher
    Owens, Max
    Amlung, Michael
    Sweet, Lawrence H.
    MacKillop, James
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 257
  • [10] Event-related potentials in a decision-making task with delayed and immediate reward conditions
    Heldmann, M
    Rüsseler, J
    Münte, TF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) : 270 - 274