Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Yield Response to Different Sulfur Rates and Sources

被引:5
|
作者
Sharma, Ayush K. [1 ]
Sandhu, Amanpreet K. [1 ]
Sidhu, Simranpreet K. [1 ]
Griffin, Winniefred D. [1 ]
Kaur, Navdeep [1 ]
Sharma, Lakesh K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Soil Water & Ecosyst Sci Dept, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
elemental sulfur; gypsum; plant nutrient; soil; vegetable; LEACHING LOSSES; NITROGEN; ASSIMILATION; ACCUMULATION; FERTILIZERS;
D O I
10.21273/HORTSCI16870-22
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
Sulfur (S) is the fourth most essential nutrient after nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) with a direct role in amino acid syntheses, such as methionine, cysteine, and N assimilation. Potato is a fast-growing vegetable crop with a small crop cycle; therefore, nutrient applications at the appropriate time, place, rate, and source are essential. The objective was to determine the effect of different S sources on the potato tuber yield, specific gravity, external tuber quality, and internal tuber quality. This study was conducted in 2021 and 2022, and three S sources were applied at two different rates (T1, 45 kg & BULL;ha-1; T2, 90 kg & BULL;ha-1) using a 3 x 2 factorial design. Three S sources were derived from the sulfate of ammonia (AS; SO42- source), magnesium sulfate (EPTOP; S0 source), and gypsum (SO42- source). Three potato cultivars were used for this study (Atlantic, Satina, and Red La Soda). The total and marketable yields indicated a positive response to the application of the S sources. Gypsum and EPTOP outperformed AS, and the lower rate (T1) performed better than the higher rate (T2). In one of the trials, the maximum yield difference between AS and gypsum was 33%. The maximum specific gravity for cultivar Atlantic was found with AS and gypsum, whereas Red La Soda and Satina did not respond to any S source. We did not report the treatment effects on the external and internal disorders when weather affected them.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) yield response to simulated hail damage
    Jalali, Amir Hooshang
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2013, 59 (07) : 981 - 987
  • [2] Yield response of indeterminate potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) to simulated insect defoliation
    Ziems, Jesse R.
    Zechmann, Benjamin J.
    Hoback, W. Wyatt
    Wallace, John C.
    Madsen, Rod A.
    Hunt, Thomas E.
    Higley, Leon G.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (06) : 1435 - 1441
  • [3] Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Response to Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilization Rates
    Mokrani, K.
    Hamdi, K.
    Tarchoun, N.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2018, 49 (11) : 1314 - 1330
  • [4] Genetic Diversity and Yield Stability of Potato(Solanum tuberosum L.)
    Biswas M K
    Hossain M
    Islam R
    [J]. 中国马铃薯, 2008, (01) : 1 - 8
  • [5] Stability of tuber yield of potato genotypes (Solanum tuberosum L.)
    Perez Lopez, Delfina de Jesus
    Vazquez Garcia, Luis Miguel
    Castellanos, Jaime Sahagun
    Pena, Antonio Rivera
    [J]. REVISTA FITOTECNIA MEXICANA, 2007, 30 (03) : 279 - 284
  • [6] Impact of Different Shading Levels on Growth, Yield and Quality of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
    Schulz, Vanessa S.
    Munz, Sebastian
    Stolzenburg, Kerstin
    Hartung, Jens
    Weisenburger, Sebastian
    Graeff-Honninger, Simone
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2019, 9 (06):
  • [7] Microtuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
    J. Gopal
    J. L. Minocha
    H. S. Dhaliwal
    [J]. Plant Cell Reports, 1998, 17 : 794 - 798
  • [8] Microtuberization in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
    Gopal, J
    Minocha, JL
    Dhaliwal, HS
    [J]. PLANT CELL REPORTS, 1998, 17 (10) : 794 - 798
  • [9] The effects of living mulches on tuber yield of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)
    Boyd, NS
    Gordon, R
    Asiedu, SK
    Martin, RC
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 2001, 18 (03) : 203 - 220
  • [10] EFFECTS OF NITROGEN ON YIELD AND CHLOROPHYLL OF POTATO (SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.) CULTIVARS
    Guler, Semiha
    [J]. BANGLADESH JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2009, 38 (02): : 163 - 169