Administration and Results of a State Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Academic Standards in Science for Students Who Are Blind and Have Low Vision

被引:0
|
作者
McCarthy, Tessa [1 ]
Schles, Rachel Anne [2 ]
Moore, Debra W. W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Educ, Teaching Learning & Leading, 5330 Wesley W Posvar Hall,230 South Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Peabody Coll Educ & Human Dev, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Pharm, Program Evaluat & Res Unit, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
assessment; alternative assessment; visual impairment; blindness; DISABILITIES; PERFORMANCE; CURRICULUM; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1177/0145482X221149746
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study evaluated performance and engagement on the tactile science alternate assessment based on alternate academic standards (AA-AAS). This assessment was designed for students with significant intellectual disabilities and visual impairments (i.e., blindness and low vision). Four primary research questions guided this study. What were the demographic characteristics of the students who took the tactile AA-AAS-science? How did students who took the tactile AA-AAS-science perform? What accommodations, accessibility options, and communication strategies were employed in the administration of the tactile AA-AAS-science? Was there a correlation between any administration practices and improved student results? Methods: Thirty-four students with visual impairments and significant intellectual disabilities participated in the 2017 administration of the AA-AAS-science. Post-hoc analyses of the testing strategies were conducted using video recordings of each assessment. Videos were coded for accommodations, student performance, engagement, and appropriateness of the assessment for each student. Results: The tactile materials were the primary accommodation provided to students and were totally novel in 79.1% of the administrations. Students were not permitted to thoroughly explore materials. In many cases, the exam content was determined to be too difficult for the students. Discussion: This study supports the literature and suggests benefits in academic instruction for all students. For academic instruction to be meaningful, students need appropriate accommodations and consistent materials. Implications for Practitioners: Test administrators for assessments based on alternate academic standards should use familiar materials during a test administration, preferably the same materials used during instruction. It is also important for teachers to prepare students and allow for time to systematically explore tactile materials. Teachers can support students by including academic goals in the individualized education program.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 61
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Alignment of an alternate assessment with state academic standards: Evidence for the content validity of the Wisconsin alternate assessment
    Roach, AT
    Elliott, SN
    Webb, NL
    JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2005, 38 (04): : 218 - 231
  • [2] Characteristics of and Implications for Students Participating in Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Academic Achievement Standards
    Kearns, Jacqueline Farmer
    Towles-Reeves, Elizabeth
    Kleinert, Harold L.
    Kleinert, Jane O'Regan
    Thomas, Megan Kleine-Kracht
    JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (01): : 3 - 14
  • [3] Characteristics of Students Who Take an Alternate Assessment Based on Modified Achievement Standards
    Shaftel, Julia
    Rutt, Benjamin T.
    JOURNAL OF DISABILITY POLICY STUDIES, 2012, 23 (03) : 156 - 167
  • [4] Making Hands-On Science Learning Accessible for Students Who Are Blind or Have Low Vision
    Supalo, Cary A.
    Isaacson, Mick D.
    Lombardi, Michael V.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 2014, 91 (02) : 195 - 199
  • [5] Teacher Perceptions of Alternate Assessments Based on Alternate Achievement Standards: Results From a Three-State Survey
    Restorff, Diane
    Sharpe, Michael
    Abery, Brian
    Rodriguez, Michael
    Kim, Nam Keol
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2012, 37 (03): : 185 - 198
  • [6] Why IEP Teams Assign Low Performers With Mild Disabilities to the Alternate Assessment Based on Alternate Achievement Standards
    Cho, Hyun-Jeong
    Kingston, Neal
    JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (03): : 162 - 174
  • [7] Knowledge of concept prototypes of students who are blind or have low vision
    Zeppuhar, ME
    Walls, RT
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 1998, 92 (11) : 812 - 822
  • [8] Implementing an Alternate Assessment based on Modified Academic Achievement Standards: When policy meets practice
    Lemons, Christopher J.
    Kloo, Amanda
    Zigmond, Naomi
    Fulmer, Deborah
    Lupp, Lynda
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISABILITY DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATION, 2012, 59 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [9] Process-Driven Math: An Auditory Method of Mathematics Instruction and Assessment for Students Who Are Blind or Have Low Vision
    Gulley, Ann P.
    Smith, Luke A.
    Price, Jordan A.
    Prickett, Logan C.
    Ragland, Matthew F.
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2017, 111 (05) : 465 - 471
  • [10] Multisensory learning experiences for students who are blind or low vision in the chemistry and science laboratories
    Supalo, Cary A.
    Mallouk, Thomas E.
    Rankel, Lillian A.
    Wohlers, David
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 237