共 50 条
Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer
被引:4
|作者:
Yang, Szu-Chun
[1
]
Ou, Huang-Tz
[2
,3
]
Su, Wu-Chou
[4
]
Wang, Shi-Yi
[5
,6
,7
]
机构:
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Clin Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Coll Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Pharm, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Oncol, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Chron Dis Epidemiol, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Canc Outcomes Publ Policy & Effectiveness Res COPP, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, 60 Coll St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
来源:
关键词:
atezolizumab;
cost-effectiveness;
immunotherapy;
lung cancer;
nivolumab;
pembrolizumab;
NIVOLUMAB PLUS IPILIMUMAB;
SPECIFIED FINAL ANALYSIS;
METASTATIC NSCLC;
OPEN-LABEL;
CHEMOTHERAPY;
PEMBROLIZUMAB;
ATEZOLIZUMAB;
MULTICENTER;
QUALITY;
SAFETY;
D O I:
10.1002/cam4.5632
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background Researchers have not simultaneously compared the cost-effectiveness of six immunotherapies with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness across different programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels.Methods A Markov model with lifetime horizon was created for seven regimens: pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (pembro-chemo), nivolumab plus ipilimumab (nivo-ipi), nivolumab, ipilimumab plus chemotherapy (nivo-ipi-chemo), atezolizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo-chemo), atezolizumab, bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (atezo-beva-chemo), single-agent pembrolizumab, and chemotherapy alone. Input parameters were derived from trial data, a network meta-analysis, and other literature. We conducted the analysis from the perspective of US health care sector.Results For all patients without considering PD-L1 expression, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of pembro-chemo versus chemotherapy was $183,299 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). The preferred regimens based on ICERs differed by PD-L1 levels. For patients with PD-L1 >= 50%, pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy and pembro-chemo versus pembrolizumab resulted in ICERs of $96,189 and $198,913 per QALY, respectively. The other strategies were dominated. For patients with PD-L1 of 1%-49%, the ICER of pembro-chemo comparing to chemotherapy was $218,159 per QALY. The other regimens were dominated by pembro-chemo. For patients with PD-L1 < 1%, nivo-ipi versus chemotherapy and nivo-ipi-chemo versus nivo-ipi resulted in ICERs of $161,277 and $881,975 per QALY, and the other regimens were dominated strategies. At the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, pembrolizumab had 87% and pembro-chemo had 1% probabilities being cost-effective in patients with PD-L1 >= 50% and 1%-49%, respectively. Nivo-ipi had a 34% probability being cost-effective in patients with PD-L1 < 1%.Conclusions The PD-L1 level should be incorporated into treatment decision-making. Our findings suggest that first-line pembrolizumab, pembro-chemo, and nivo-ipi are the preferred strategies for patients with PD-L1 >= 50%, 1%-49%, and < 1%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:8838 / 8850
页数:13
相关论文