Ad libitum feeding systems for lactating sows: effects on productivity and welfare of sows and piglets

被引:1
|
作者
Gorr, Sarah C. [1 ]
Leeb, Christine [1 ]
Zollitsch, Werner [1 ]
Winckler, Christoph [1 ]
Parsons, Thomas D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, Gregor-Mendel-Str 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Penn, Swine Teaching & Res Ctr, New Bolton Ctr, Sch Vet Med,Dept Clin Studies, 382 West St Rd Sq, Philadelphia, PA 19348 USA
关键词
Ad libitum; Behavior; Farrowing; Feed intake; Piglet growth; BODY-COMPOSITION; FARROWING CRATES; PRIMIPAROUS SOWS; WEIGHT-LOSS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.animal.2024.101093
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The nutritional requirements of sows change during lactation and thus require adapted and dynamic feeding regimes that consider the sows' behavioral needs and production traits. The present study evaluated the effect of four different feeding systems on productivity and aspects of the welfare of 61 sows and their piglets during lactation. A non-ad libitum system (CON) was compared with two computer-monitored (COMP, COMP + ) ad libitum feeding systems, that allowed sows to access feed via displacement of an electronic sensor, as well as a third purely mechanical ad libitum feeding system (MECH). Daily feed disappearance, piglet growth, piglet growth per feed disappearance as well as sows' weight and conception rate were recorded. Health indicators of sows and piglets were scored as well as sow behavior analyzed for a total of 96 hours/sow from video recordings taken on days 2-4 and 23 postfarrowing (n = 35 sows). Sows from all three ad libitum systems (COMP, COMP+, MECH) showed a lower feed disappearance than CON (P < 0.01). Additionally, average daily piglet growth tended to be higher (P = 0.05) and piglet growth per sow feed disappearance was significantly higher in all three ad libitum systems than in CON (P < 0.01). Piglet mortality, sow weight loss and subsequent conception rates did not differ between treatment groups. Piglets in COMP and COMP + had fewer head lesions (P = 0.01). Sows in all three ad libitum systems spent more time with their head in the trough than in the non-ad libitum system (P < 0.01). Occurrence of sow stereotypies (vacuum chewing, biting fixtures) was rare (typically < 2% of scans) and did not differ between treatments. Our data suggest that sows fed ad libitum eat what they need and can convert feed more efficiently into the piglets' growth without additional weight loss. Furthermore, the increased time sows spent in ad libitum systems with their head in the trough points toward longer feeding times, which might be beneficial in terms of meeting pigs' behavioral need to forage. Taken together, our initial studies on sow feeding behavior and feed efficiency will benefit the development of new lactation feeding systems that promise to improve animal welfare and productivity while reducing feed costs. (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium. This is an openaccess article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ad libitum feeding of pregnant sows
    不详
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2005, 40 (04) : 408 - 408
  • [2] Ad libitum feeding and fertility in sows
    不详
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2005, 40 (04) : 406 - 406
  • [3] Feeding dry sows ad libitum with high fibre diets
    Ru, YJ
    Bao, YM
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2004, 17 (02): : 283 - 300
  • [4] Behaviour analysis of pregnant sows with energetic adapted ad libitum feeding
    Angermann, Eva
    Kunath, Luise
    Ebschke, S.
    Wensch-Dorendorf, Monika
    Und, Nicole Kemper
    von Borell, E.
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2018, 90 (04): : 293 - 303
  • [5] Ad libitum lactation feeding of sows introduced immediately before, at, or after farrowing
    Neil, M
    ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1996, 63 : 497 - 505
  • [6] Effect of soybean feeding on productivity of sows, growth of piglets and quality of pork
    Tedtova, V. V.
    Temiraev, R. B.
    Kairov, V. R.
    Dzhaboeva, A. S.
    Yurina, N. A.
    Temiraev, K. B.
    Baeva, Z. T.
    Bobyleva, L. A.
    Zagaraeva, E. F.
    Efendiev, B. S.
    JOURNAL OF LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2020, 11 : 20 - 25
  • [7] Methods of improving productivity of sows and of piglets
    Solyanik, V.
    Kuznetsov, U.
    Solyanik, U.
    Glaskovich, U.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2019, 54 : 124 - 124
  • [8] Reproductive performance of group-housed sows under ad libitum feeding conditions
    Meyer, E
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2001, 73 (05): : 334 - 342
  • [9] A quasi ad-libitum electronic feeding system for gestating sows in loose housing
    Perez-Munoz, F
    Hoff, SJ
    Van Hal, T
    COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 1998, 19 (03) : 277 - 288
  • [10] Effects of ad libitum and rationed feeding of sows during several consecutive parities on the productivity 1st communication: Live weight development, dynamic of backfat thickness and frequency of selected sows
    Ziron, M
    Hoy, S
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2003, 75 (01): : 31 - 41