Molecular subtyping of head and neck cancer - Clinical applicability and correlations with morphological characteristics

被引:2
|
作者
Stoegbauer, Fabian [1 ,2 ]
Otto, Raik [3 ]
Joehrens, Korinna [4 ]
Tinhofer, Ingeborg [5 ,6 ]
Keilholz, Ulrich [5 ,7 ,8 ]
Poremba, Christopher [9 ]
Keller, Ulrich [5 ,10 ,11 ,12 ,13 ,14 ]
Leser, Ulf [3 ]
Weichert, Wilko [1 ,2 ,15 ]
Boxberg, Melanie [1 ,2 ,8 ,15 ]
Klinghammer, Konrad [5 ,8 ,10 ,11 ,12 ,16 ,17 ,18 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
[2] Inst Gen & Surg Pathol, TUM Sch Med & Hlth, Munich, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Inst Comp Sci, Knowledge Management Bioinformat, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[5] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[6] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiooncol & Radiotherapy, Berlin, Germany
[7] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[8] Charite Comprehens Canc Ctr, Berlin, Germany
[9] Pathol Munchen Nord, Ernst Pl Str 2, D-80992 Munich, Germany
[10] Dept Hematol Oncol & Canc Immunol, Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[11] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[12] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[13] Max Delbruck Ctr Mol Med, Berlin, Germany
[14] German Ctr Translat Canc Res DKTK, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
[15] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Inst Pathol, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
[16] Dept Hematol Oncol & Canc Immunol, Charite Univ Med Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[17] Free Univ Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
[18] Humboldt Univ, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-12200 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Disease recurrence; NanoString; Tumor budding; Gene expression; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; EXPRESSION; CETUXIMAB; PLATFORM; PROPOSAL; HPV;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106678
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: We aimed to evaluate the applicability of a customized NanoString panel for molecular subtyping of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC). Additionally, histological analyses were conducted, correlated with the molecular subtypes and tested for their prognostic value. Material and Methods: We conducted molecular subtyping of R/M-HNSCC according to the molecular subtypes defined by Keck et al. For molecular analyses a 231 gene customized NanoString panel (the most accurately subtype defining genes, based on previous analyses) was applied to tumor samples from R/M-HNSCC patients that were treated in the CeFCiD trial (AIO/IAG-KHT trial 1108). A total of 130 samples from 95 patients were available for sequencing, of which 80 samples from 67 patients passed quality controls and were included in histological analyses. H&E stained slides were evaluated regarding distinct morphological patterns (e.g. tumor budding, nuclear size, stroma content). Results: Determination of molecular subtypes led to classification of tumor samples as basal (n = 46, 45 %), inflamed/mesenchymal (n = 31, 30 %) and classical (n = 26, 25 %). Expression levels of Amphiregulin (AREG) were significantly higher for the basal and classical subtypes compared to the mesenchymal subtype. While molecular subtypes did not have an impact on survival, high levels of tumor budding were associated with poor outcomes. No correlation was found between molecular subtypes and histological characteristics. Conclusions: Utilizing the 231-gene NanoString panel we were able to determine the molecular subtype of R/ M-HNSCC samples by the use of FFPE material. The value to stratify for different treatment options remains to be explored in the future. The prognostic value of tumor budding was underscored in this clinically well an- notated cohort.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer: Molecular biology and clinicopathological correlations
    Zoltán Szentirmay
    Károly Pólus
    László Tamás
    Gabriella Szentkuti
    Judit Kurcsics
    Erzsébet Csernák
    Erika Tóth
    Miklós Kásler
    Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 2005, 24 : 19 - 34
  • [2] Human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer:: Molecular biology and clinicopathological correlations
    Szentirmay, Z
    Pólus, K
    Tamás, L
    Szentkuti, G
    Kurcsics, J
    Csernák, E
    Tóth, E
    Kásler, M
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEWS, 2005, 24 (01) : 19 - 34
  • [3] Clinical update on cancer: molecular oncology of head and neck cancer
    Y Suh
    I Amelio
    T Guerrero Urbano
    M Tavassoli
    Cell Death & Disease, 2014, 5 : e1018 - e1018
  • [4] Clinical update on cancer: molecular oncology of head and neck cancer
    Suh, Y.
    Amelio, I.
    Urbano, T. Guerrero
    Tavassoli, M.
    CELL DEATH & DISEASE, 2014, 5 : e1018 - e1018
  • [5] Head and neck cancer patients' recollection of their clinical characteristics
    Rogers, S. N.
    Al-Nakisbandi, H.
    Dahill, A.
    Lowe, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 59 (01): : 86 - 90
  • [6] Clinical characteristics of paraneoplastic syndromes in patients with head and neck cancer
    Diao, Wenwen
    Liang, Ya
    Gao, Liming
    Zhu, Yingying
    Zhu, Xiaoli
    Yu, Shuting
    Xia, Xin
    Chen, Xingming
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 7 (04): : 1002 - 1010
  • [7] Head and neck cancer in nonsmokers: A distinct clinical and molecular entity
    Koch, WM
    Lango, M
    Sewell, D
    Zahurak, M
    Sidransky, D
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1999, 109 (10): : 1544 - 1551
  • [8] Clinical Applicability of the Proliferation Marker Thymidine Kinase 1 in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Meirovitz, Amichay
    Gross, Menachem
    Leibovici, Vera
    Sheva, Kim
    Popovzer, Aharon
    Barak, Vivian
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (02) : 1083 - 1087
  • [9] MORPHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL ASPECTS OF HEAD AND NECK PARAGANGLIOMA
    MILEWSKI, C
    HNO, 1993, 41 (11) : 526 - 531
  • [10] Lobular breast cancer: Clinical, molecular and morphological characteristics
    Christgen, Matthias
    Steinemann, Doris
    Kuehnle, Elna
    Laenger, Florian
    Gluz, Oleg
    Harbeck, Nadia
    Kreipe, Hans
    PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 212 (07) : 583 - 597