Assessing Efficiency and Environmental Performance of a Nearly Zero-Energy University Building's Energy System in Norway

被引:10
|
作者
Abrahamsen, Fredrik Ege [1 ]
Ruud, Sturla Grina [2 ]
Gebremedhin, Alemayehu [2 ]
机构
[1] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Dept Elect Syst, N-2815 Gjovik, Norway
[2] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Engn, Dept Mfg & Civil Engn, N-2815 Gjovik, Norway
关键词
building performance; energy accounting; zero-energy buildings; nearly zero-energy buildings; renewable energy; photovoltaic electricity generation; district heating; life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SWISS;
D O I
10.3390/buildings13010169
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Increasing awareness of climate issues in recent decades has led to new policies on buildings' energy consumption and energy performance. The European Union (EU) directive 2010/31/EC, i.e., the energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD), is one of the measures initiated to achieve climate and energy goals by reducing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in the building sector. The EPBD required all new buildings to be nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) by 2021. Nearly zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) are buildings with a very-high-energy performance and nearly zero or low-energy requirements covered to a very significant extent by energy from renewable sources produced on-site or nearby. The utilisation of solar photovoltaic (PV) panels is a common approach for achieving the nZEB standard. The carbon footprint of PV panels is often not discussed as a parameter. This paper aimed to analyse the environmental performance of an existing nearly zero-energy university building in a Norwegian use case scenario. This analysis is performed by assessing annual electricity and heat consumption from both energetic and environmental perspectives. The energy required for the building during the studied period is then used to analyse the environmental and energy performance of the building. When it comes to the environmental assessment, the commercial software SimaPro was used. The proposed revision EPBD and nZEB definition from 2021 suggests that nZEBs should also consider operational greenhouse gas emissions and life-cycle global warming potential from 2027. The life cycle assessment (LCA) of the building's energy sources looks at the global warming potential (GWP) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and how they compare to Norwegian grid electricity. The results of the analysis highlights potential challenges to justifying the use of alternative energy sources to fulfil the criteria of nZEBs. When installing solar PV, it is important to consider the energy mix of the country where the solar PVs are produced. To solely consider the energy performance of the building, the installation of solar PV panels in countries with a high share of renewable energy may result in a reduced impact in terms of emission reduction from a life cycle perspective.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the improvement of indoor environmental quality, energy performance and costs for a commercial nearly zero-energy building
    De Luca, Giovanna
    Ballarini, Ilaria
    Paragamyan, Argun
    Pellegrino, Anna
    Corrado, Vincenzo
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 27 (08) : 1056 - 1074
  • [2] Geothermal heat pump plant performance in a nearly zero-energy building
    Fadejev, Jevgeni
    Simson, Raimo
    Kurnitski, Jarek
    Kesti, Jyrki
    Mononen, Tarmo
    Lautso, Petteri
    [J]. Sustainable Built Environment Tallinn and Helsinki Conference SBE16 Build Green and Renovate Deep, 2016, 96 : 489 - 502
  • [3] Development of Experimental Load Management System for Nearly Zero-Energy Building
    Maask, Vahur
    Rosin, Argo
    Roasto, Indrek
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 59TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING OF RIGA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY (RTUCON), 2018,
  • [4] Building Policies for Energy Efficiency and the Development of a Zero-Energy Building Envelopment System in Korea
    Kang, Jae-Sik
    Lim, Ji-Hye
    Choi, Gyeung-Seok
    Lee, Seung-Eon
    [J]. GREEN BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES AND MATERIALS II, 2013, 689 : 35 - 38
  • [5] A Comparison of the Environmental Performance between Construction Materials and Operational Energy of Nearly Zero-Energy Wood-Based Educational Building
    Mitterpach, Jozef
    Vanova, Rozalia
    Sedivka, Premysl
    Stefko, Jozef
    [J]. FORESTS, 2022, 13 (02):
  • [6] Assessing the nearly zero-energy building gap in university campuses with a feature extraction methodology applied to a case study in Spain
    Medrano M.
    Martí J.M.
    Rincón L.
    Mor G.
    Cipriano J.
    Farid M.
    [J]. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2018, 9 (3) : 227 - 247
  • [7] Energy flexibility of a nearly zero-energy building with weather predictive control on a convective building energy system and evaluated with different metrics
    Liu, Mingzhe
    Heiselberg, Per
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 233 : 764 - 775
  • [8] Review on performance aspects of nearly zero-energy districts
    Amaral, Ana Rita
    Rodrigues, Eugenio
    Gaspar, Adelio Rodrigues
    Gomes, Alvaro
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2018, 43 : 406 - 420
  • [9] Ensuring functionality of a nearly zero-energy building with procurement methods
    Kantola, Mikko
    Saari, Arto
    [J]. FACILITIES, 2014, 32 (7-8) : 312 - +
  • [10] Transforming vocational education and training for nearly zero-energy building
    Clarke, Linda
    Sahin-Dikmen, Melahat
    Winch, Christopher
    [J]. BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2020, 1 (01): : 650 - 661