Comparison of a novel hand-held retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by the wiltse approach and posterior TLIF: a one-year prospective controlled study

被引:2
|
作者
Shen, Xing [1 ]
Li, Fu Tao [1 ]
Cheng, Yong Quan [1 ]
Zheng, Ming Hui [1 ]
Yao, Xin Qiang [1 ]
Wang, Hai Ming [2 ]
Chen, Jian Ting [1 ]
Jiang, Hui [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Div Spinal Surg, 1838 North Guangzhou Ave, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Third Affiliated Hosp, Ctr Orthopaed Surg, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Wiltse approach TLIF; Open; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Hand-held retractors system; LOW-BACK-PAIN; LONG-TERM; ASYMPTOMATIC VOLUNTEERS; PARASPINAL MUSCLES; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; SPINE SURGERY; QUANTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; FAT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07248-w
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes and safety of a novel hand-held retractor system-assisted Wiltse TLIF with that P-TLIF and assess whether this hand-held retractor system assisted Wiltse TLIF can yield less paraspinal muscle injury. Methods 56 patients (P-TLIF: 26, Wiltse TLIF: 30) were included in this one year prospective controlled study. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, mobilization time, and discharge time were recorded. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by ODI, VAS, JOA, and SF-36 scores (7 days, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery). Paraspinal muscle injury was assessed by postoperative MRI (6 months after surgery). CK and C-reaction protein were measured pre and postoperatively, and CT or X-ray (one year postoperatively) was used to assess bony union/non-union. Results The Wiltse (study) group was associated with significantly less estimated blood loss (79.67 +/- 28.59 ml vs 192.31 +/- 59.48 ml, P = 0.000*), postoperative drainage (43.33 +/- 27.89 ml vs 285.57 +/- 123.05 ml, P = 0.000*), and shorter mobilization (4.1 +/- 1.2 d vs. 3.0 +/- 0.9 d, P < 0.05) and discharge times (7.7 +/- 1.9 d vs. 6.1 +/- 1.2 d, P = 0.002*) than the P-TLIF (control) group. Serum CK activity at 24 h postoperatively in the study group was significantly lower than in the control group (384.10 +/- 141.99 U/L vs 532.76 +/- 225.76 U/L, P = 0.018*). At 7 days after surgery, VAS (2.3 +/- 0.6 vs 3.2 +/- 0.7, P = 0.000*)and ODI scores (43.9 +/- 11.9 vs 55.2 +/- 12.9, P = 0.001*) were lower, while the JOA scores (18.4 +/- 3.4 vs 16.3 +/- 4.2, P = 0.041*) was higher in the control group than in the study group. Results observed at 3 months of follow-up were consistent with those at 7 days. After six months postoperatively, paraspinal muscle degeneration in the control group was more significant than in the study group (P = 0.008*). Conclusion Our study showed that this novel hand-held retractor system assisted Wiltse approach TLIF can significantly reduce paraspinal muscle injury, postoperative drainage, and intraoperative blood loss, mobilization and discharge time, as well as yield better short-term outcomes compared to P-TLIF.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Comparison of a novel hand-held retractor-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by the wiltse approach and posterior TLIF: a one-year prospective controlled study
    Xing Shen
    Fu Tao Li
    Yong Quan Cheng
    Ming Hui Zheng
    Xin Qiang Yao
    Hai Ming Wang
    Jian Ting Chen
    Hui Jiang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25
  • [2] Minimally invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One-year postoperative morbidity, clinical and radiological results of a prospective multicenter study of 182 cases
    Giorgi, H.
    Prebet, R.
    Delhaye, M.
    Aurouer, N.
    Mangione, P.
    Blondel, B.
    Tropiano, P.
    Fuentes, S.
    Parent, H. -F.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (06) : S241 - S245
  • [3] Radiographic Analysis of Pedicle Screw Retractor-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single-Segment Spondylolisthesis in Adults: A Retrospective Study and Technical Note
    Xie, Hongwei
    Ouyang, Ziyu
    Zhang, Hua
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (09) : 2219 - 2229
  • [4] Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) for Treatment of Lumbar Degeneration Disease A Prospective Cohort Study
    Zhu, Hai-Feng
    Fang, Xiang-Qian
    Zhao, Feng-Dong
    Zhang, Jian-Feng
    Zhao, Xing
    Hu, Zhi-Jun
    Fan, Shun-Wu
    SPINE, 2022, 47 (06) : E233 - E242
  • [5] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) in treatment of degenerative diseases of lumbosacral spine compared to modified open TLIF: a prospective randomised controlled study
    Kalina, Roman
    NEUROLOGIA I NEUROCHIRURGIA POLSKA, 2024, 58 (05) : 503 - 511
  • [6] Static Versus Expandable Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Interbody Cages: A Comparison of One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    DiMaria, Stephen L.
    Patel, Parthik D.
    Divi, Srikanth N.
    Chang, Michael
    Timmons, Tyler
    Grewal, Lovy
    Hallman, Haydn
    Lee, Joseph K.
    Kaye, I. David
    Woods, Barrett, I
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Anderson, D. Greg
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : E492 - E501
  • [7] Comparing Cortical Bone Trajectory and Traditional Pedicle Screws in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study of One-Year Outcomes
    Gutierrez, Juanmarco
    Erwood, Andrew M.
    Malcolm, James G.
    Grogan, Dayton P.
    Greven, Alexander C.
    Gary, Matthew F.
    Rodts, Gerald E.
    Stricsek, Geoffrey P.
    Refai, Daniel
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [8] Lateral decubitus single position anterior–posterior (AP) fusion shows equivalent results to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at one-year follow-up
    Kimberly Ashayeri
    J. Alex Thomas
    Brett Braly
    Nicholas O’Malley
    Carlos Leon
    Ivan Cheng
    Brian Kwon
    Mark Medley
    Leon Eisen
    Themistocles S. Protopsaltis
    Aaron J. Buckland
    European Spine Journal, 2022, 31 : 2227 - 2238
  • [9] One-Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and Posterior Approach: Is Transforaminal Lateral Interbody Fusion Mandatory? A Randomized Controlled Trial With 2-Year Follow-Up
    Challier, Vincent
    Boissiere, Louis
    Obeid, Ibrahim
    Vital, Jean-Marc
    Castelain, Jean-Etienne
    Benard, Antoine
    Ong, Nathalie
    Ghailane, Soufiane
    Pointillart, Vincent
    Mazas, Simon
    Mariey, Remi
    Gille, Olivier
    SPINE, 2017, 42 (08) : 531 - 539
  • [10] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) with bilateral decompression via unilateral approach and open-TLIF with bilateral decompression for degenerative lumbar diseases: a retrospective cohort study
    Zhu, Fengzhao
    Jia, Dongqing
    Zhang, Yaqing
    Feng, Chencheng
    Ning, Ya
    Leng, Xue
    Zhou, Yue
    Li, Changqing
    Huang, Bo
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)