Gender bias in postgraduate year one pharmacy letters of recommendation

被引:0
|
作者
Sahlstrom Drury, Anna [1 ,10 ]
Bookstaver, P. Brandon [2 ]
Chang, Kevin [3 ]
Cook, Aaron M. [1 ,4 ]
Hobbs, Brandon [5 ]
Leung, Jonathan [6 ]
Moon, Jean [7 ]
Nei, Scott [6 ]
Schadler, Aric [4 ,8 ]
Witenko, Corey [9 ]
Bissell, Brittany D. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Dept Pharm Serv, Lexington, KY USA
[2] Univ South Carolina, Coll Pharm, Columbia, SC USA
[3] Loyola Univ, Dept Pharm, Med Ctr, Maywood, IL USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Coll Pharm, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Orlando Hlth, Orlando, FL USA
[6] Mayo Clin Hosp, Rochester, MN USA
[7] Univ Minnesota, Pharmaceut Care & Hlth Syst, Coll Pharm, Minneapolis, MN USA
[8] Univ Kentucky HealthCare, Dept Pediat, Lexington, KY USA
[9] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[10] 800 Rose St H110, Lexington, KY 40536 USA
关键词
bias; gender; linguistics; recommendation; residency; training;
D O I
10.1002/jac5.1788
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
IntroductionLetters of recommendation (LORs) are important in pharmacy residency applications. Applicant gender, among other variables, may result in implicit biases that could impact LORs and/or residency attainment. This study hypothesized that LORs have linguistic gender differences in pharmacy residency applications. ObjectivesThe primary objective was to determine if gender-linguistic differences exist in applicants' LORs. Gender was assessed via the pronouns utilized within the applications. The secondary outcome was to assess LOR linguistic and demographic differences between candidates who did and did not receive interviews. MethodsThis was a multiyear, multicenter study involving postgraduate year one (PGY1) applicants to participating pharmacy residency programs. Demographic data were extracted using the PhORCAS (Pharmacy Online Residency Centralized Application Service) WebADMIT (Admissions Management System) portal, and LORs were analyzed by validated linguistics processing software. ResultsA total of 7529 LORs and 2383 applicants (28.5% men, 71.5% women) were included. Women candidates had higher mean number of awards (4.71 vs. 4.1, p = 0.001) and leadership positions (4.87 vs. 4.48, p = 0.019). Compared with men candidates, women had statistically significantly higher levels of clout (p < 0.001), positive emotion (p = 0.01), social processes (p < 0.001), prosocial behavior (p = 0.002), and social referents (p < 0.001). Women also had lower authenticity compared with men candidates (p < 0.001). Two thousand and one hundred twenty applicants included in the secondary analysis found no difference in offer to interview between women and men candidates (odds ratio [OR] 1.173 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.895-1.57], p = 0.247). ConclusionsMen and women applicants' LORS differed in specific linguistic variables, although offer to interview was not significantly different based on gender. LOR writers and programs should consider implicit biases that could affect residency offers to interview.
引用
收藏
页码:446 / 457
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comment on "Gender bias in postgraduate year one pharmacy letters of recommendation"
    Perona, Stephen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 6 (10): : 1160 - 1160
  • [2] Response to comment on "Gender bias in postgraduate year one pharmacy letters of recommendation"
    Sahlstrom Drury, Anna
    Leung, Jonathan G.
    Witenko, Corey
    Nei, Scott
    Moon, Jean
    Bissell Turpin, Brittany
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 6 (10): : 1161 - 1162
  • [3] Gender bias in postgraduate year one pharmacy letters of recommendation (vol 6, pg 1161, 2023)
    Drury, Sahlstrom A.
    Leung, J. G.
    Witenko, C.
    Nei, S.
    Moon, J.
    Turpin, B. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 7 (04): : 409 - 409
  • [4] Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation
    Hargrove, John S.
    [J]. FISHERIES, 2022, 47 (07) : 289 - 289
  • [5] Gender bias found in recommendation letters
    Kruesi, Liz
    [J]. PHYSICS WORLD, 2016, 29 (11) : 10 - 10
  • [6] WORDS MATTER: GENDER BIAS IN LETTERS OF RECOMMENDATION
    Feldman, Hope A.
    Papageorge, Marianna V.
    Antonoff, Mara B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 166 (05): : E179 - E179
  • [7] Gender bias in colorectal surgery fellowship letters of recommendation
    Oslock, Wendelyn M.
    Lansing, Shan S.
    Coleman, Lisa R.
    Oslock, Austin G.
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Noria, Sabrena
    Husain, Syed
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 227 : 198 - 203
  • [8] Gender Bias within Letters of Recommendation in Vascular Surgery
    Go, Catherine
    Lang, Susan
    Byrne, Mark
    Brucha, Diana
    Parviainen, Kristiina
    Sachdev, Ulka
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 229 (04) : E185 - E185
  • [9] Gender and Racial Bias in Radiology Residency Letters of Recommendation
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Redmond, Rebecca A.
    Campbell, James C.
    Rosette, Ashleigh S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 17 (01) : 64 - 71
  • [10] Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Urology Residency Applicants
    Filippou, Pauline L.
    Mahajan, Sejal L.
    Wallen, Eric M.
    Tan, Hung-Jui
    Pruthi, Raj
    Smith, Angela B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 225 (04) : S76 - S76