Effect of wall thickness of 3D-printed models on resisting deformation from thermal forming in-office aligners

被引:0
|
作者
Bennett, Gregory W. [1 ,3 ]
DiGiovanni, Tia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Dent, Lincoln, NE USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Dent, Lincoln, NE USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Dent, Dept Adult Restorat Dent, Lincoln NE 4000 East Campus Loop South, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
来源
关键词
printing; three-dimensional; Orthodontic appliances; removable; stereolithography; DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1002/cre2.827
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundFabricating clear aligners by thermoforming three-dimensional printed dental models requires a high degree of accuracy. It is unknown whether model thickness affects the accuracy when used to thermoform aligners.PurposeThis research utilizes three-dimensional printed models made with differing wall thicknesses to determine its effect on their ability to withstand deformation during aligner fabrication.MethodsA total of 50 models of different wall thickness (10 each of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 mm, and solid) were printed using model resin (Model V2, Formlabs) on a low-force stereolithography printer (Form 3B, Formlabs). Aligners were then fabricated using a thermal pressure forming machine (Biostar V, Great Lakes Dental Technologies) utilizing 25 s cycles to adapt 0.030 '' acrylic sheets (Invisacryl, Great Lakes Dental Technologies), then removed from the models and sprayed with a contrast powder (Optispray, Dentsply Sirona) to aid in scanning with an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan, Dentsply Sirona). Each aligner's data was then compared to the original file used for printing with 3D comparison software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems).ResultsThe results show model thickness greater than or equal to 2.0 mm produced clinically acceptable results within the margin of error (0.3 mm). A total of 0.5 mm thickness failed to withstand thermal forming in 4 of the 10 trials. A total of 0.5 mm produced 27.56% of results in tolerance, 1.0 mm produced 75.66% of results in tolerance, 1.5 mm had 80.38% of results in tolerance, 86.82% of 2 mm models were in tolerance, and solid had 96.45% of results in tolerance.ConclusionHollow models of thicknesses 2.0 mm and solid models produced clinically acceptable aligners while utilizing less resin per unit compared to solid models, thus being more cost effective, time efficient and eco-friendly. Therefore, a recommendation can be made to print hollow models with a shell thickness of greater than 2.0 mm for aligner fabrication.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thickness Variations of Thermoformed and 3D-Printed Clear Aligners
    Bandid, Ruzica
    Vodanovid, Katarina
    Kekez, Ivna Vukovid
    Mikid, Ivana Medvedec
    Galid, Ivan
    Govorko, Danijela Kalibovid
    ACTA STOMATOLOGICA CROATICA, 2024, 58 (02) : 145 - 155
  • [2] Effect of printing orientation and resin thickness on flexural strength of direct 3D-printed aligners
    Khalil, Ahmed S.
    Zaher, Abbas R.
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01):
  • [3] Fracture toughness and hardness of in-office, 3D-printed ceramic brackets
    Polychronis, Georgios
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N. N.
    Riollo, Christopher S. S.
    Panayi, Nearchos
    Zinelis, Spiros
    Eliades, Theodore
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2023, 26 (03) : 476 - 480
  • [4] Effect of the Height of a 3D-Printed Model on the Force Transmission and Thickness of Thermoformed Orthodontic Aligners
    Ghoraba, Omar
    Bourauel, Christoph
    Aldesoki, Mostafa
    Singer, Lamia
    Ismail, Ahmed M.
    Elattar, Hanaa
    Alhotan, Abdulaziz
    Elshazly, Tarek M.
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (12)
  • [5] Force Expressed by 3D-Printed Aligners with Different Thickness and Design Compared to Thermoformed Aligners: An in Vitro Study
    Cremonini, Francesca
    Pancari, Carolina
    Brucculeri, Luca
    Shabankare, Ariyan Karami
    Lombardo, Luca
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (06):
  • [6] Effect of printing orientation on mechanical properties of 3D-printed orthodontic aligners
    Camenisch, Lukas
    Polychronis, Georgios
    Panayi, Nearchos
    Makou, Olga
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Zinelis, Spiros
    Eliades, Theodore
    JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE, 2024,
  • [7] An In Vitro Comparison Study Regarding Retention Force Expressed by Thermoformed Aligners and 3D-Printed Aligners with Different Thickness and Design
    Cremonini, Francesca
    Cappelletti, Marta
    Brucculeri, Luca
    Olivero, Virginia
    Lombardo, Luca
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [8] Effect of firing time and wall thickness on the biaxial flexural strength of 3D-printed zirconia
    Rues, Stefan
    Herpel, Christopher
    Ilani, Ali
    Schmitt, Clemens
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Schwindling, Franz Sebastian
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2024, 40 (03) : 484 - 492
  • [9] 'Invisible' orthodontics by polymeric 'clear' aligners molded on 3D-printed personalized dental models
    Yu, Xiaoye
    Li, Guanghui
    Zheng, Yikan
    Gao, Jingming
    Fu, Ye
    Wang, Qunsong
    Huang, Lei
    Pan, Xiaogang
    Ding, Jiandong
    REGENERATIVE BIOMATERIALS, 2022, 9 (01)
  • [10] In-house 3D-printed aligners: effect of in vivo ageing on mechanical properties
    Can, Esad
    Panayi, Nearchos
    Polychronis, Georgios
    Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
    Zinelis, Spiros
    Eliades, George
    Eliades, Theodore
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 44 (01) : 51 - 55