Feature selection using a sinusoidal sequence combined with mutual information

被引:3
|
作者
Yuan, Gaoteng [1 ]
Lu, Lu [2 ]
Zhou, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Comp & Informat, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] Lib Nanjing Forestry Univ, Nanjing 210037, Peoples R China
关键词
Feature selection; Mutual information; Sinusoidal sequence; High-dimensional data; SSMI algorithm; FEATURE-EXTRACTION; CLASSIFICATION; ALGORITHM; FILTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107168
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Data classification is the most common task in machine learning, and feature selection is the key step in the classification task. Common feature selection methods mainly analyze the maximum correlation and minimum redundancy between feature factors and tags while ignoring the impact of the number of key features, which will inevitably lead to waste in subsequent classification training. To solve this problem, a feature selection algorithm (SSMI) based on the combination of sinusoidal sequences and mutual information is proposed. First, the mutual information between each feature and tag is calculated, and the interference information in high-dimensional data is removed according to the mutual information value. Second, a sine function is constructed, and sine ordering is carried out according to the mutual information value and feature mean value between different categories of the same feature. By adjusting the period and phase value of the sequence, the feature set with the largest difference is found, and the subset of key features is obtained. Finally, three machine learning classifiers (KNN, RF, SVM) are used to classify key feature subsets, and several feature selection algorithms (JMI, mRMR, CMIM, SFS, etc.) are compared to verify the advantages and disadvantages of different algorithms. Compared with other feature selection methods, the SSMI algorithm obtains the least number of key features, with an average reduction of 15 features. The average classification accuracy has been improved by 3% on the KNN classifier. On the HBV and SDHR datasets, the SSMI algorithm achieved classification accuracy of 81.26% and 83.12%, with sensitivity and specificity results of 76.28%, 87.39% and 68.14%, 86.11%, respectively. This shows that the SSMI algorithm can achieve higher classification accuracy with a smaller feature subset.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effective feature selection scheme using mutual information
    Huang, D
    Chow, TWS
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2005, 63 : 325 - 343
  • [2] Feature selection using mutual information in CT colonography
    Ong, Ju Lynn
    Seghouane, Abd-Krim
    [J]. PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2011, 32 (02) : 337 - 341
  • [3] Feature selection using Joint Mutual Information Maximisation
    Bennasar, Mohamed
    Hicks, Yulia
    Setchi, Rossitza
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2015, 42 (22) : 8520 - 8532
  • [4] Using Mutual Information for Feature Selection in Programmatic Advertising
    Ciesielczyk, Michal
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIONS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (INISTA), 2017, : 290 - 295
  • [5] Feature selection using a mutual information based measure
    Al-Ani, A
    Deriche, M
    [J]. 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITON, VOL IV, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 82 - 85
  • [6] Feature selection using Decomposed Mutual Information Maximization
    Macedo, Francisco
    Valadas, Rui
    Carrasquinha, Eunice
    Oliveira, M. Rosario
    Pacheco, Antonio
    [J]. NEUROCOMPUTING, 2022, 513 : 215 - 232
  • [7] Feature Selection for Text Classification Using Mutual Information
    Sel, Ilhami
    Karci, Ali
    Hanbay, Davut
    [J]. 2019 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DATA PROCESSING (IDAP 2019), 2019,
  • [8] AMIFS:: Adaptive feature selection by using mutual information
    Tesmer, M
    Estévez, PA
    [J]. 2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 303 - 308
  • [9] Feature Selection Using Mutual Information: An Experimental Study
    Liu, Huawen
    Liu, Lei
    Zhang, Huijie
    [J]. PRICAI 2008: TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 5351 : 235 - 246
  • [10] Weighted Mutual Information for Feature Selection
    Schaffernicht, Erik
    Gross, Horst-Michael
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS AND MACHINE LEARNING - ICANN 2011, PT II, 2011, 6792 : 181 - 188