Mindfully outraged: Mindfulness increases deontic retribution for third-party injustice

被引:5
|
作者
Kay, Adam A. [1 ]
Masters-Waage, Theodore C. [2 ,3 ]
Reb, Jochen [2 ]
Vlachos, Pavlos A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Business Sch St Lucia, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Lee Kong Chian Sch Business, 50 Stamford Rd, Singapore 178899, Singapore
[3] INSEAD, Asia Campus 1 Ayer Rajah Ave, Singapore 138676, Singapore
[4] Amer Coll Greece, ALBA Grad Business Sch, Athens 11528, Greece
关键词
Mindfulness; Third -party justice; Vicarious mistreatment; Deontic justice; Moral outrage; Emotion regulation; Self; -transcendence; Retribution; Punishment; Intuition; PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS; AGGRESSIVE RESPONSES; POSITIVE EMOTIONS; MORAL EMOTIONS; SELF-REPORT; WORKPLACE; MEDITATION; ANGER; BENEFITS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2023.104249
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Mindfulness is known to temper negative reactions by both victims and perpetrators of injustice. Accordingly, critics claim that mindfulness numbs people to injustice, raising concerns about its moral implications. Exam-ining how mindful observers respond to third-party injustice, we integrate mindfulness with deontic justice theory to propose that mindfulness does not numb but rather enlivens people to injustice committed by others against others. Results from three studies show that mindfulness heightens moral outrage in witnesses of injustice, particularly when the injustice is only moderate. Although these findings did not replicate with a mindfulness induction, post-hoc analysis in a fourth study reveals that measured state mindfulness perhaps heightens moral outrage when observers have a weak deontic justice orientation. In documenting this moral enlivening effect, we demonstrate that mindfulness - measured as a state or trait - leads people to exact greater deontic retribution against perpetrators of third-party injustice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Third-party punishment: Retribution or deterrence?
    Tan, Fangfang
    Xiao, Erte
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 67 : 34 - 46
  • [2] Extending the Deontic Model of Justice: Moral Self-Regulation in Third-Party Responses to Injustice
    Rupp, Deborah E.
    Bell, Chris M.
    BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2010, 20 (01) : 89 - 106
  • [3] Gratitude increases third-party punishment
    Vayness, Jonathan
    Duong, Fred
    DeSteno, David
    COGNITION & EMOTION, 2020, 34 (05) : 1020 - 1027
  • [4] Third-Party Support for Retribution, Rehabilitation, and Giving an Offender a Clean Slate
    Brubacher, Michael R.
    PSYCHOLOGY PUBLIC POLICY AND LAW, 2018, 24 (04) : 503 - 517
  • [5] Third-Party Prejudice Accommodation Increases Gender Discrimination
    Vial, Andrea C.
    Brescoll, Victoria L.
    Dovidio, John F.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 117 (01) : 73 - 98
  • [6] Punitive versus compensatory reactions to injustice: Emotional antecedents to third-party interventions
    Lotz, Sebastian
    Okimoto, Tyler G.
    Schloesser, Thomas
    Fetchenhauer, Detlef
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 47 (02) : 477 - 480
  • [7] Priming third-party ostracism increases affiliative imitation in children
    Over, Harriet
    Carpenter, Malinda
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2009, 12 (03) : F1 - F8
  • [8] Retribution and Utilitarianism as Motives for Children's Third-Party Punishment: An Information-Seeking Approach
    Twardawski, Mathias
    Hilbig, Benjamin E.
    MOTIVATION SCIENCE, 2024, 10 (04) : 387 - 391
  • [9] Neural mechanisms of the mood effects on third-party responses to injustice after unfair experiences
    Xie, Enhui
    Liu, Mengdie
    Liu, Jieqiong
    Gao, Xiaoxue
    Li, Xianchun
    HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2022, 43 (12) : 3646 - 3661
  • [10] Epistemic Injustice at the ICC? An Empirical Analysis of the Use of Third-Party Evidence in the Afghanistan Situation
    Evans, Hayley N.
    Hazim, Mahir
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE, 2024, 22 (01)