Fast Well Control Optimization with Two-Stage Proxy Modeling

被引:3
|
作者
Ng, Cuthbert Shang Wui [1 ]
Ghahfarokhi, Ashkan Jahanbani [1 ]
Wiranda, Wilson [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Geosci & Petr, N-7031 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
global and local proxy modeling; machine learning; derivative-free optimization; reservoir simulation; RESERVOIRS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3390/en16073269
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Waterflooding is one of the methods used for increased hydrocarbon production. Waterflooding optimization can be computationally prohibitive if the reservoir model or the optimization problem is complex. Hence, proxy modeling can yield a faster solution than numerical reservoir simulation. This fast solution provides insights to better formulate field development plans. Due to technological advancements, machine learning increasingly contributes to the designing and building of proxy models. Thus, in this work, we have proposed the application of the two-stage proxy modeling, namely global and local components, to generate useful insights. We have established global proxy models and coupled them with optimization algorithms to produce a new database. In this paper, the machine learning technique used is a multilayer perceptron. The optimization algorithms comprise the Genetic Algorithm and the Particle Swarm Optimization. We then implemented the newly generated database to build local proxy models to yield solutions that are close to the "ground truth". The results obtained demonstrate that conducting global and local proxy modeling can produce results with acceptable accuracy. For the optimized rate profiles, the R-2 metric overall exceeds 0.96. The range of Absolute Percentage Error of the local proxy models generally reduces to 0-3% as compared to the global proxy models which has a 0-5% error range. We achieved a reduction in computational time by six times as compared with optimization by only using a numerical reservoir simulator.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A two-stage step-wise framework for fast optimization of well placement in coalbed methane reservoirs
    Zhang, Jiyuan
    Feng, Qihong
    Zhang, Xianmin
    Bai, Jia
    Karacan, C. Ozgen
    Wang, Ya
    Elsworth, Derek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2020, 225
  • [2] Two-stage turbocharger modeling for engine control and estimation
    Shu, Yong
    van Nieuwstadt, Michiel
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION 2007, VOL 16: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2008, : 243 - 252
  • [3] Two-Stage robust optimization problems with two-stage uncertainty
    Goerigk, Marc
    Lendl, Stefan
    Wulf, Lasse
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 302 (01) : 62 - 78
  • [4] Modeling and Adaptive Control of Two-Stage Matrix Converters
    Hamouda, M.
    Fnaiech, F.
    Al-Haddad, K.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING-IREE, 2008, 3 (01): : 83 - 92
  • [5] Optimization of drivability control functions with two-stage rate limiters
    Figel, K. J.
    Wobbe, F.
    Schultalbers, M.
    Svaricek, F.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (15): : 187 - 192
  • [6] A two-stage optimization and control for CCHP microgrid energy management
    Luo, Zhao
    Wu, Zhi
    Li, Zhenyuan
    Cai, HongYi
    Li, BaoJu
    Gu, Wei
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 125 : 513 - 522
  • [7] A Two-Stage Economic Optimization and Predictive Control for EV Microgrid
    Zou, Yuanyuan
    Li, Shaoyuan
    Dong, Yi
    Niu, Yugang
    IECON 2018 - 44TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS SOCIETY, 2018, : 5951 - 5956
  • [8] Fast reconnection in a two-stage process
    Heitsch, F
    Zweibel, EG
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 583 (01): : 229 - 244
  • [9] Effects of modeling error on structure damage diagnosis by two-stage optimization
    Yang, SM
    Lee, GS
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONTORING 2000, 1999, : 871 - 880
  • [10] Two-Stage Gaussian Process Modeling of Microwave Structures for Design Optimization
    Jacobs, J. Pieter
    Koziel, Slawomir
    SIMULATION-DRIVEN MODELING AND OPTIMIZATION, 2016, 153 : 161 - 184