COVID-19 pandemic hits differently: examining its consequences for women's livelihoods and healthcare access - a cross-sectional study in Kinshasa DRC

被引:1
|
作者
Fankam, Falone Nkweleko [1 ]
Ugarte, William [2 ]
Akilimali, Pierre [3 ]
Etah, Junior Ewane [4 ]
Akerman, Eva [5 ]
机构
[1] Dalarna Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Falun, Sweden
[2] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Kinshasa, Kinshasa Sch Publ Hlth, Kinshasa, DEM REP CONGO
[4] Univ Buea, Fac Sci, Dept Microbiol & Parasitol, Buea, Cameroon
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
COVID-19; public health; reproductive medicine;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072869
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
ObjectivesThe emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic led to multiple preventive actions as primary interventions to contain the spread of the virus. Globally, countries are facing enormous challenges with consequences for use of social, economic and health services. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) was among the African countries implementing strict lockdown at the start of the pandemic, resulting in shortages and decreased access to services. The adverse effects of the pandemic had unpleasant consequences for the country. This study aimed to examine the association between COVID-19 pandemic-related factors, sociodemographic factors, and the need to visit healthcare facilities, including family planning services, among women aged 15-49 years in the DRC.MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of a performance monitoring for action (PMA) cross-sectional COVID-19 phone survey in Kinshasa, DRC, which had a response rate of 74.7%. In total, 1325 randomly selected women aged 15-49 years from the Kinshasa province who had previously participated in the PMA baseline survey participated in the survey. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to assess associations.ResultsThe COVID-19 pandemic and related factors affected 92% of women in the Kinshasa province socioeconomically. A majority were highly economically dependent on their partner or some other sources for their basic needs to be met, and even more worried about the future impact of the pandemic on their household finances. Over 50% of women did not attempt visiting a health service, with some of the top reasons being fear of being infected with COVID-19 and not being able to afford services. We found a significant association between age groups and contraceptive use. The need for and use of contraceptives was higher among women aged 25-34 years than those aged 15-24 or 35-49 years.ConclusionEffective social/economic support to women and girls during pandemics and in crises is essential as it can have lasting beneficial effects on many domains of their lives, including their ability to access health services and the contraceptives of their choice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 pandemic hits differently: examining its consequences for women's livelihoods and healthcare access - a cross-sectional study in Kinshasa DRC
    Fankam, Falone Nkweleko
    Ugarte, William
    Akilimali, Pierre
    Etah, Junior Ewane
    Akerman, Eva
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [2] Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Women's Health Care Access: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Turner, Kea
    Brownstein, Naomi C.
    Whiting, Junmin
    Arevalo, Mariana
    Islam, Jessica Y.
    Vadaparampil, Susan T.
    Meade, Cathy D.
    Gwede, Clement K.
    Kasting, Monica L.
    Head, Katharine J.
    Christy, Shannon M.
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 31 (12) : 1690 - 1702
  • [3] Women's reproductive autonomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
    Barbosa, Carolyne Souza de Moura
    da Silva, Ana Cecilia Silvestre
    de Melo, Gessyca Cavalcante
    de Franca, Alba Maria Bomfim
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2025, 33
  • [4] The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional study
    Vouros, M.
    Koutoukoglou, P.
    Jelastopulu, E.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 65 : S503 - S503
  • [5] Examining the burnout levels of healthcare employees and related factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study
    Akten, Ilknur Metin
    Yildirim, Tugce Bilge
    Digin, Figen
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2023, 76 (02): : 461 - 471
  • [6] Assessment of COVID-19 management and its consequences on healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study from Bangladesh
    Ara, Tasnim
    Ferdous, Zannatul
    Mahi, Mahfuza
    Amin, Emama
    Chowdhury, Sarah Binte
    Shafiur Rahman, Md
    Rahman, Lutfor
    Rahman, Md Mahabubur
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (07):
  • [7] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare access and utilisation in South Sudan: a cross-sectional mixed methods study
    M. A. S. Schots
    H. L. S. Coleman
    G. W. Lutwama
    M. Straetemans
    E. Jacobs
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [8] The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare access and utilisation in South Sudan: a cross-sectional mixed methods study
    Schots, M. A. S.
    Coleman, H. L. S.
    Lutwama, G. W.
    Straetemans, M.
    Jacobs, E.
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [9] Examining the psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: an international cross-sectional study protocol
    Tanveer, Sandila
    Schluter, Philip J.
    Porter, Richard J.
    Boden, Joseph
    Beaglehole, Ben
    Sulaiman-Hill, Ruqayya
    Dean, Shaystah
    Bell, Romana
    Al-Hussainni, Wafaa N.
    Arshi, Maliheh
    Nordin, Amer Siddiq Amer
    Dinc, Mehmet
    Khan, Mussarat Jabeen
    Khoshnami, Mohammad Sabzi
    Al-Masoodi, Muthana A. Majid
    Moghanibashi-Mansourieh, Amir
    Noruzi, Sara
    Rahajeng, Anggi
    Shaikh, Shaista
    Tanveer, Nisa
    Topcu, Feyza
    Yapan, Saadet
    Yunianto, Irfan
    Zoellner, Lori A.
    Bell, Caroline
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [10] The level of anxiety in pregnant women in COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study
    Kilinc, Z.
    Sari, H.
    Asena, M.
    Ertugrul, S.
    Isen, G.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (15) : 5581 - 5586