Study on the NeuralProphet forecast TEC model over China during the severe geomagnetic storm in March 2015

被引:0
|
作者
Ma Bin [1 ,2 ]
Huang ling [1 ,2 ]
Wu Han [1 ,2 ]
Lou YiDong [3 ]
Zhang HongPing [3 ]
Chen DeZhong [3 ]
Wang GaoYang [4 ]
Huang liangke [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Guilin Univ Technol, Coll Geomat & Geoinformat, Guilin 541006, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Key Lab Spatial Informat & Geomat, Guilin 541006, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Res Ctr GNSS, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Prov Bur Geol & Mineral Resources, Geol Team 1, Jinan 250014, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
IONOSPHERIC TEC;
D O I
10.6038/cjg2023R0225
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Ionospheric delay is one of the significant error sources in global navigation satellite system. It is essential to improve the accuracy of ionospheric TEC modeling and forecasting for enhancing the accuracy of satellite navigation positioning. In this paper, a NeuralProphet neural network model (NP) is constructed with solar radiation flux index (F10.7), geomagnetic activity index (Dst), geographic coordinates and GIM from Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) as influence factors and input parameters. And the presented NP model is applied for the short-term forcasting of ionospheric TEC over China during the severe magnetic storm in March 2015. In order to verify the performence of NP model, a Long Short-term Memory Neural Network (LSTM) model is implemented for comparative analysis. The statistical analysis results show that the root mean square error (RMSE) and relative deviation (RD) of NP model during the geomagnetic storm period (DOY076-078) are 0. 83 TECU and 3. 13%, respectively, which are 1. 49 TECU and 10. 25% more accurate than LSTM model from the perspectives of absolute and relative accuracy. And for the ratio of RMSE less than 1. 5 TECU, NP forecast model is about 97. 24%, which is much better than LSTM model. The TEC predictions from NP model has good consistency and unbiasedness with CAS-TEC showing the mean bias of 0. 01 TECU, while the LSTM model has a larger mean bias of 1. 49 TECU. The RMSE of NP model are 1. 12, 0. 83 and 0. 44 TECU, respectively, from low to mid-latitudinal zone, and the forecasting accuracy is 1. 94, 1. 56 and 1. 23 TECU higher than LSTM model. The proposed NP forecast model has a significantly better forecasting performance than LSTM, which would be useful for characterizing the spatial temporal characteristics more accurately under disturbed conditions over China.
引用
收藏
页码:452 / 460
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] 3HM k4Slf-ff4, 2019, Aat44- IGS FO,AM3f*gisubf*F0,A/RV i-A444k, V62, P4493
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, 5+-1144, V65, P2365, DOI [10.6038/cjg2022P0557, DOI 10.6038/CJG2022P0557]
  • [3] [Anonymous], AV, aMil. 2019, V49, P1051, DOI [10.1360/N092018-00104, DOI 10.1360/N092018-00104]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, Ilstiii-ARFP,AE-TEc4A-4* i.k3ttti4.44K, V55, P2177
  • [5] Short term electricity load forecasting using hybrid prophet-LSTM model optimized by BPNN
    Bashir, Tasarruf
    Chen Haoyong
    Tahir, Muhammad Faizan
    Zhu Liqiang
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 1678 - 1686
  • [6] Bent Rodney B., 1975, Effect of the ionosphere on space systems and communications, V1, P13
  • [7] Deng Z X, 2012, Study on the ionospheric TEC storm and its forecasting method
  • [8] Study on the ionospheric TEC storms over China
    Deng Zhong-Xin
    Liu Rui-Yuan
    Zhen Wei-Min
    Liu Dun
    Wu Ye-Wen
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2012, 55 (07): : 2177 - 2184
  • [9] WHAT IS A GEOMAGNETIC STORM
    GONZALEZ, WD
    JOSELYN, JA
    KAMIDE, Y
    KROEHL, HW
    ROSTOKER, G
    TSURUTANI, BT
    VASYLIUNAS, VM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1994, 99 (A4) : 5771 - 5792
  • [10] Modeling of ultraviolet auroral intensity based on Generalized Regression Neural Network associated with IMF/solar wind and geomagnetic parameters
    Hu ZeJun
    Han Bing
    Lian HuiFang
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2020, 63 (05): : 1738 - 1750