Performance and enteric methane emissions from housed beef cattle fed silage produced on pastures with different forage profiles

被引:4
|
作者
Meo-Filho, P. [1 ]
Hood, J. [2 ]
Lee, M. R. F. [1 ,3 ]
Fleming, H. [1 ]
Meethal, M. E. [1 ,4 ]
Misselbrook, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rothamsted Res North Wyke, Net Zero & Resilient Farming, Okehampton EX20 2SB, Devon, England
[2] Rothamsted Res, Intelligent Data Ecosyst, West Common, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, Hereford, England
[3] Harper Adams Univ, Newport TF10 8NB, Shrops, England
[4] Coll Vet & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Genet & Breeding, Wayanad 673576, India
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Greenhouse gases; GreenFeed; Livestock; North Wyke Farm Platform; Ruminants; PERENNIAL RYEGRASS; MILK-PRODUCTION; CLOVER SILAGES; DAIRY-COWS; DIGESTION; QUALITY; GRASS;
D O I
10.1016/j.animal.2023.100726
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Methane (CH4) produced by ruminants is a significant source of greenhouse gases from agriculture in the United Kingdom (UK), accounting for approximately 50% of the emissions in this sector. Ration modification is linked to changes in rumen fermentation and can be an effective means of CH4 abatement. In temperate climate countries, forage silage represents a major feed component for cattle during the housing period. The objective of this study was, therefore, to compare enteric CH4 emission from cattle offered silage produced from different types of grassland. Beef cattle, steers (n = 89) and heifers (n = 88) with average liveweight (LW) of 328 +/- 57.1 kg were evaluated during two housing seasons (2016-2017 and 2017-2018) from November to April, at the Rothamsted Research North Wyke Farm Platform (UK). The treatments corresponded to three diet types, comprising silage harvested from three different pastures: MRG, monoculture of perennial ryegrass (PRG, Lolium perenne L.cv. AberMagic), bred to express the high-sugar phenotype; RG-WC, a mixed sward comprised of the same perennial ryegrass cultivar with white clover (Trifolium repens L.) with a target clover proportion of 30% as land cover; and permanent pasture (PP) dominated by PRG and a small number of non-introduced species. MRG and PP received 160-200 kg N/ha/year. Cattle were weighed every 30 days, and the enteric CH4 emission was determined using GreenFeed automated systems. No significant differences in enteric CH4 emission per head or per kg LW were observed between treatments. However, emission expressed per average daily gain (ADG) in LW was greater (P < 0.001) for MRG compared with RG-WC and PP, at 270, 248 and 235 g CH4/kg ADG, respectively. This related to a lower ADG (P = 0.041) for the animals fed MRG silage compared with RG-WC and PP which were similar, with respective values of 0.67, 0.71 and 0.74 kg/day. The forages compared in this study showed little or no potential to reduce enteric CH4 emission when fed as silage to growing beef cattle during the winter housing period. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of forage diversity on forage productivity, nutritive value, beef cattle performance, and enteric methane emissions
    Thompson, Logan R.
    Maciel, Isabella C. F.
    Rodrigues, Patricia D. R.
    Cassida, Kim A.
    Rowntree, Jason E.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (12)
  • [2] Enteric methane emissions, energy partitioning, and energetic efficiency of zebu beef cattle fed total mixed ration silage
    Subepang, Sayan
    Suzuki, Tomoyuki
    Phonbumrung, Thamrongsak
    Sommart, Kritapon
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2019, 32 (04): : 548 - 555
  • [3] Linseed suppresses enteric methane emissions from cattle fed barley silage, but not from those fed grass hay
    Chung, Y. -H.
    He, M. L.
    McGinn, S. M.
    McAllister, T. A.
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 321 - 329
  • [4] Models to predict enteric methane emissions from cows fed different forage sources.
    Manconi, R.
    Atzori, A. S.
    Appuhamy, J. A. D. R. N.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2020, 103 : 287 - 287
  • [5] Enteric methane emissions from dairy cows fed different proportions of highly digestible grass silage
    Patel, M.
    Wredle, E.
    Borjesson, G.
    Danielsson, R.
    Iwaasa, A. D.
    Sporndly, E.
    Bertilsson, J.
    ACTA AGRICULTURAE SCANDINAVICA SECTION A-ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 61 (03): : 128 - 136
  • [6] Fluxes of greenhouse gases from pastures and methane emissions from beef cattle in Australia
    Shirvan, Milad Bagheri
    Gonzalez, Luciano A.
    Burgess, Jillian E. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102
  • [7] Fluxes of greenhouse gases from pastures and methane emissions from beef cattle in Australia
    Shirvan, Milad Bagheri
    Gonzalez, Luciano A.
    Burgess, Jillian E. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 102 : 322 - 323
  • [8] Methane emissions from enteric fermentation in Alberta's beef cattle population
    Basarab, JA
    Okine, EK
    Baron, VS
    Marx, T
    Ramsey, P
    Ziegler, K
    Lyle, K
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 85 (04) : 501 - 512
  • [9] Optimal dose of 3-nitrooxypropanol for decreasing enteric methane emissions from beef cattle fed high-forage and high-grain diets
    Vyas, D.
    McGinn, S. M.
    Duval, S. M.
    Kindermann, M. K.
    Beauchemin, K. A.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2018, 58 (06) : 1049 - 1055
  • [10] Enteric methane emissions from backgrounded cattle consuming all-forage diets
    Ominski, K. H.
    Boadi, D. A.
    Wittenberg, K. M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 86 (03) : 393 - 400