Gravitational-wave Electromagnetic Counterpart Korean Observatory (GECKO): GECKO Follow-up Observation of GW190425

被引:6
|
作者
Paek, Gregory S. H. [1 ]
Im, Myungshin [1 ]
Kim, Joonho [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Gu [1 ,3 ]
Park, Bomi [1 ]
Choi, Changsu [1 ,4 ]
Kim, Sophia [1 ]
Barbieri, Claudio [5 ,6 ]
Salafia, Om Sharan [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Paek, Insu [1 ]
Shin, Suhyun [1 ]
Seo, Jinguk [1 ]
Lee, Hyung Mok [1 ]
Lee, Chung-Uk [4 ]
Kim, Seung-Lee [4 ]
Sung, Hyun-Il [4 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, SNU Astron Res Ctr, Dept Phys & Astron, Astron Program, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Daegu Natl Sci Museum, 20 Techno Daero 6 Gil,Yuga myeon, Daegu 43023, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Earth Sci, Busan 46241, South Korea
[4] Korea Astron & Space Sci Inst, 776 Daedeokdae Ro, Daejeo 34055, South Korea
[5] Univ Milano Bicocca, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[6] Sez Milano Bicocca, INFN, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[7] INAF, Osservatorio Astron Brera sede Merate, I-23807 Merate, Lecco, Italy
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 2024年 / 960卷 / 02期
基金
英国科学技术设施理事会; 新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
NEUTRON-STAR MERGER; R-PROCESS NUCLEOSYNTHESIS; COMPACT OBJECTS; MULTIMESSENGER SEARCHES; GALAXY CATALOG; HOST GALAXIES; LIGHT CURVES; KILONOVA; EVENTS; TELESCOPE;
D O I
10.3847/1538-4357/ad0238
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
One of the keys to the success of multimessenger astronomy is the rapid identification of the electromagnetic wave counterpart, kilonova (KN), of the gravitational-wave (GW) event. Despite its importance, it is hard to find a KN associated with a GW event, due to a poorly constrained GW localization map and numerous signals that could be confused as a KN. Here, we present the Gravitational-wave Electromagnetic wave Counterpart Korean Observatory (GECKO) project, the GECKO observation of GW190425, and prospects of GECKO in the fourth observing run (O4) of the GW detectors. We outline our follow-up observation strategies during O3. In particular, we describe our galaxy-targeted observation criteria that prioritize based on galaxy properties. Armed with this strategy, we performed an optical and/or near-infrared follow-up observation of GW190425, the first binary neutron star merger event during the O3 run. Despite a vast localization area of 7460 deg(2), we observed 621 host galaxy candidates, corresponding to 29.5% of the scores we assigned, with most of them observed within the first 3 days of the GW event. Ten transients were discovered during this search, including a new transient with a host galaxy. No plausible KN was found, but we were still able to constrain the properties of potential KNe using upper limits. The GECKO observation demonstrates that GECKO can possibly uncover a GW170817-like KN at a distance <200 Mpc if the localization area is of the order of hundreds of square degrees, providing a bright prospect for the identification of GW electromagnetic wave counterparts during the O4 run.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LOCALIZATION AND BROADBAND FOLLOW-UP OF THE GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE TRANSIENT GW 150914
    Abbott, B. P.
    Abbott, R.
    Abbott, T. D.
    Abernathy, M. R.
    Acernese, F.
    Ackley, K.
    Adams, C.
    Adams, T.
    Addesso, P.
    Adhikari, R. X.
    Adya, V. B.
    Affeldt, C.
    Agathos, M.
    Agatsuma, K.
    Aggarwal, N.
    Aguiar, O. D.
    Aiello, L.
    Ain, A.
    Ajith, P.
    Allen, B.
    Allocca, A.
    Altin, P. A.
    Anderson, S. B.
    Anderson, W. G.
    Arai, K.
    Araya, M. C.
    Arceneaux, C. C.
    Areeda, J. S.
    Arnaud, N.
    Arun, K. G.
    Ascenzi, S.
    Ashton, G.
    Ast, M.
    Aston, S. M.
    Astone, P.
    Aufmuth, P.
    Aulbert, C.
    Babak, S.
    Bacon, P.
    Bader, M. K. M.
    Baker, P. T.
    Baldaccini, F.
    Ballardin, G.
    Ballmer, S. W.
    Barayoga, J. C.
    Barclay, S. E.
    Barish, B. C.
    Barker, D.
    Barone, F.
    Barr, B.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2016, 826 (01)
  • [2] Optical Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events with Las Cumbres Observatory
    Arcavi, Iair
    McCully, Curtis
    Hosseinzadeh, Griffin
    Howell, D. Andrew
    Vasylyev, Sergiy
    Poznanski, Dovi
    Zaltzman, Michael
    Maoz, Dan
    Singer, Leo
    Valenti, Stefano
    Kasen, Daniel
    Barnes, Jennifer
    Piran, Tsvi
    Fong, Wen-fai
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2017, 848 (02)
  • [3] Deep Follow-up for Gravitational-wave Inference: A Case Study with GW151226
    Vajpeyi, Avi
    Smith, Rory
    Thrane, Eric
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 947 (01):
  • [4] An Early-warning System for Electromagnetic Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events
    Sachdev, Surabhi
    Magee, Ryan
    Hanna, Chad
    Cannon, Kipp
    Singer, Leo
    SK, Javed Rana
    Mukherjee, Debnandini
    Caudill, Sarah
    Chan, Chiwai
    Creighton, Jolien D. E.
    Ewing, Becca
    Fong, Heather
    Godwin, Patrick
    Huxford, Rachael
    Kapadia, Shasvath
    Li, Alvin K. Y.
    Lok Lo, Rico Ka
    Meacher, Duncan
    Messick, Cody
    Mohite, Siddharth R.
    Nishizawa, Atsushi
    Ohta, Hiroaki
    Pace, Alexander
    Reza, Amit
    Sathyaprakash, B. S.
    Shikauchi, Minori
    Singh, Divya
    Tsukada, Leo
    Tsuna, Daichi
    Tsutsui, Takuya
    Ueno, Koh
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2020, 905 (02)
  • [5] Where and When: Optimal Scheduling of the Electromagnetic Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events Based on Counterpart Light-curve Models
    Salafia, Om Sharan
    Colpi, Monica
    Branchesi, Marica
    Chassande-Mottin, Eric
    Ghirlanda, Giancarlo
    Ghisellini, Gabriele
    Vergani, Susanna D.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 846 (01):
  • [6] GW150914: FIRST SEARCH FOR THE ELECTROMAGNETIC COUNTERPART OF A GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE EVENT BY THE TOROS COLLABORATION
    Diaz, Mario C.
    Beroiz, Martin
    Penuela, Tania
    Macri, Lucas M.
    Oelkers, Ryan J.
    Yuan, Wenlong
    Garcia Lambas, Diego
    Cabral, Juan
    Colazo, Carlos
    Dominguez, Mariano
    Sanchez, Bruno
    Gurovich, Sebastian
    Lares, Marcelo
    Schneiter, Matias
    Grana, Dario
    Renzi, Victor
    Rodriguez, Horacio
    Starck, Manuel
    Vrech, Ruben
    Artola, Rodolfo
    Chiavassa Ferreyra, Antonio
    Girardini, Carla
    Quinones, Cecilia
    Tapia, Luis
    Tornatore, Marina
    Marshall, Jennifer L.
    DePoy, Darren L.
    Branchesi, Marica
    Brocato, Enzo
    Padilla, Nelson
    Pereyra, Nicolas A.
    Mukherjee, Soma
    Benacquista, Matthew
    Key, Joey
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2016, 828 (02)
  • [7] The Gravitational Wave Treasure Map: A Tool to Coordinate, Visualize, and Assess the Electromagnetic Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events
    Wyatt, Samuel D.
    Tohuvavohu, Aaron
    Arcavi, Iair
    Lundquist, Michael J.
    Howell, D. Andrew
    Sand, David J.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 894 (02):
  • [8] First gravitational-wave burst GW150914: MASTER optical follow-up observations
    Lipunov, V. M.
    Kornilov, V.
    Gorbovskoy, E.
    Buckley, D. A. H.
    Tiurina, N.
    Balanutsa, P.
    Kuznetsov, A.
    Greiner, J.
    Vladimirov, V.
    Vlasenko, D.
    Chazov, V.
    Kuvshinov, D.
    Gabovich, A.
    Potter, S. B.
    Kniazev, A.
    Crawford, S.
    Rebolo Lopez, R.
    Serra-Ricart, M.
    Israelian, G.
    Lodieu, N.
    Gress, O.
    Budnev, N.
    Ivanov, K.
    Poleschuk, V.
    Yazev, S.
    Tlatov, A.
    Senik, V.
    Yurkov, V.
    Dormidontov, D.
    Parkhomenko, A.
    Sergienko, Yu.
    Podesta, R.
    Levato, H.
    Lopez, C.
    Saffe, C.
    Podesta, F.
    Mallamaci, C.
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 465 (03) : 3656 - 3667
  • [9] Coherent follow-up of Continuous Gravitational-Wave candidates: minimal required observation time
    Shaltev, Miroslav
    9TH EDOARDO AMALDI CONFERENCE ON GRAVITATIONAL WAVES (AMALDI 9) AND THE 2011 NUMERICAL RELATIVITY - DATA ANALYSIS MEETING (NRDA 2011), 2012, 363
  • [10] Follow-up analyses of the binary-neutron-star signals GW170817 and GW190425 by using post-Newtonian waveform models
    Narikawa, Tatsuya
    Uchikata, Nami
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (10)