Proportion of women in work teams and team performance: a moderated mediation model

被引:1
|
作者
Davcheva, Marija [1 ]
Gonzalez-Roma, Vicente [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Fac Psychol, IDOCAL, Av Blasco Ibanez 21, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
Women in work teams; Team social cohesion; Team performance; Leader-team member interactions; Social role theory; Congruence theory; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; CORPORATE BOARDS; GROUP-SIZE; COHESION; LEADERSHIP; CLIMATE; DIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; DIRECTORS; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1007/s12144-022-03534-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Women's representation in the workforce is increasing. However, we still do not know how, why, and when the proportion of females in work teams is related to team performance. Based on Social Role Theory and Congruence Theory, the purpose of the study was to ascertain whether the relationship between the proportion of women in work teams and team performance is mediated by team social cohesion, and whether this indirect effect is moderated by the frequency of leader-team member social interactions. Regarding methodological aspects, the study sample was composed of 178 work teams from three banks. We implemented a time-lagged design and collected data from two distinct sources (team members and team leaders) at three different time points. Our findings indicate that the proportion of women in teams was positively related to team performance via team social cohesion. This indirect effect was moderated by the frequency of leader-team member social interactions, so that it was positive and statistically significant only in teams with medium and high frequency of these interactions. This study reveals that team social cohesion is a mechanism through which the proportion of women in work teams can facilitate team performance, especially when team leaders frequently interact with their team members. The theoretical and practical implications of our findings were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:25028 / 25041
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proportion of women in work teams and team performance: a moderated mediation model
    Marija Davcheva
    Vicente González-Romá
    [J]. Current Psychology, 2023, 42 : 25028 - 25041
  • [2] Leader extraversion and team performance: A moderated mediation model
    Zhang, Jun
    Yin, Kui
    Li, SiQi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [3] The Effect of Empathy on Team Members' Moqi in Virtual Teams: A Moderated Mediation Model
    Yu, Xuan
    Zhang, Luxiaohe
    Liu, Meilin
    He, Bin
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 : 2619 - 2633
  • [4] LEADERS' SENSE OF POWER AND TEAM PERFORMANCE: A MODERATED MEDIATION MODEL
    Rong, Yan
    Yang, Baiyin
    Ma, Lin
    [J]. SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2017, 45 (04): : 641 - 656
  • [5] Interplay of mindful leadership, team cohesion, and performance: a moderated mediation analysis in sports teams
    Liu, Jing
    [J]. CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [6] Leader political skill and team performance: a moderated mediation model
    Liu, Jun
    Wang, Wei
    Cao, Kun-peng
    [J]. NANKAI BUSINESS REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 2 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [7] The Effects of Team Fairness on Team Innovation Behaviors and Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model
    Li, Yuhui
    Zheng, Peiqi
    Hou, Xuerui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 764 - 764
  • [8] Why and When Team Reflexivity Contributes to Team Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model
    Yang, Mengxi
    Schloemer, Hilary
    Zhu, Zheng
    Lin, Yuying
    Chen, Wansi
    Dong, Niannian
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [9] How team feedback and team trust influence information processing and learning in virtual teams: A moderated mediation model
    Penarroja, Vicente
    Orengo, Virginia
    Zornoza, Ana
    Sanchez, Jesus
    Ripoll, Pilar
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 48 : 9 - 16
  • [10] Heterogeneity and centrality of "dark personality" within teams, shared leadership, and team performance: A conceptual moderated-mediation model
    Nassif, Afif George
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 29 (04)