Market failure or politics? Understanding the motives behind regulatory actions to address surging electricity prices

被引:5
|
作者
Sirin, Selahattin Murat [1 ]
Camadan, Ercument [2 ]
Erten, Ibrahim Etem [3 ]
Zhang, Alex Hongliang [4 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Ivey Business Sch, 1255 Western Rd, London, ON N6G 0N1, Canada
[2] Univ N Carolina, 9201 Univ City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[3] NARUC, 1101 Vermont Ave,NW,Suite 200, Washington, DC 20005 USA
[4] Nanjing Univ, Yangtze River Delta Econ & Social Dev Res Ctr, 22 Hankou Rd, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Electricity market; Price spikes; Regulation; WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY; REALIZED VOLATILITY; MARGINAL-COST; SOLAR POWER; SHORT-TERM; DESIGN; SPIKES; WIND; GENERATION; SECURITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113647
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to explore the underlying motivations that drive regulatory measures to address surging electricity prices. We discuss this question with a systematic review of the literature on price spikes in electricity markets and compare the recommended measures in the literature with political and regulatory actions taken during the 2021-22 European energy crisis. Our review shows a discrepancy between the arguments presented in the literature and the regulatory narrative in practice. Although theoretical arguments assume a general regulatory framework driven primarily by market efficiency, recent regulatory decisions show that political concerns can shape regulatory measures to a great extent, and the political economy of regulation should be incorporated into market analyses.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 4 条