Experimental investigation of concrete frames reinforced with GFRP bars under reversed cyclic loading

Fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) have been widely investigated and successfully used as internal reinforcement in new reinforced concrete (RC) members and structures such as slabs, beams, bridges, multi-storey car parks and others as means to overcome the corrosion problem of steel. The linear-elastic behaviour, brittle failure and low modulus of elasticity are some of the significant mechanical characteristics of FRP rebars which raise concerns on their capability to allow structural members to dissipate energy in seismic zones and thus limit their use in earthquake resistant RC structures (such as moment resisting frames). The behaviour of concrete frames reinforced with FRP bars is still in its early stages of research and development with only a few researchers exploring such structures under in-place cyclic loading (seismic loading). As a result, design codes do not provide guidance for RC moment frames internally reinforced with FRP. This study attempts to partially fill the gap by investigating the behaviour of glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP) RC frames under in-plane loading. Six 1/3 scaled RC frames were constructed and tested under reversed cyclic loading to simulate seismic loading conditions. Three were reinforced with GFRP bent bars and three (their counterparts) with conventional steel. The testing was conducted in displacement-controlled mode with the loading history according to ACI 374.1-05. Test parameters included longitudinal reinforcement ratio and arrangement in the columns and presence of links in the joints. The experimental results are presented as hysteretic curves, lateral load / drift graphs, stiffness degradation and cumulative energy dissipated with the overall indication of the feasibility of GFRP RC frames in seismic regions. All GFRP specimens successfully reached 2.75% loading drifts. The energy dissipation of GFRP specimens was lower at initial drifts compared to the steel reinforced samples, but it become greater at final drift. GFRP frames had approximately the same load bearing capacity as their counterparts and even greater in one case. Ultimate loads for G frames were reached at higher level of displacement than for S frames.