Carbon footprints, mitigation effects and economic performance of dairy farm systems in Inner Mongolia

被引:6
|
作者
Wei, Sha [1 ]
Ledgard, Stewart [2 ]
Fan, Junming [3 ]
Tian, Yanfeng [3 ]
Dong, Hongmin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm & Sustainable Dev Agr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] AgResearch Ltd, Ruakura Res Ctr, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand
[3] Inner Mongolia YouRan Dairy Co Ltd, 169 Hexi Rd, Hohhot City 010070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Carbon footprint; Life cycle assessment; Mitigation options; Economic performance; Dairy farm system; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; DIETARY CRUDE PROTEIN; MILK-PRODUCTION; AMMONIA EMISSIONS; MANAGEMENT; NITROGEN; IMPACT; FEED; PROFITABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103835
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
CONTEXT: Reducing the GHG emissions intensity of milk production has become a key sustainability challenge for the dairy sector. Addressing this challenge requires thorough understanding of the current GHG emission levels of individual farms, the practices influencing GHG emissions, and the economic trade-offs associated with reducing those emissions.OBJECTIVE: Quantify the carbon footprint (CF) and economic performance of milk production in Inner Mongolia (the main dairy farming region in China), and understand the main contributing factors to them. The effects of potential mitigation options at dairy farm system level were evaluated.METHODS: Life cycle assessment methodology was used to analyze the CF of 15 dairy farms (with year-round cow housing and crop feeding) selected for different milk production levels, herd structures and diet composition.RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The average CF per kg of fat and protein corrected milk (FPCM; after allocation to milk) was 2.3 kg carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) (1.5-3.4 kg CO2-eq). Emissions related to feed production, manure management and enteric fermentation were the top three GHG emission sources and contributed an average of 27% (5%-46%), 28% (19%-38%) and 18% (14%-25%), respectively, to total emissions. The average cost of the farm system per ton FPCM was USD 540 per year. Feed costs dominated at 70% of the total costs. The CF of milk was negatively correlated with profit per kg FPCM. Mitigation potential of the CF of dairy production for single mitigation strategies ranged from 2.3% to 20.0% compared with business as usual, and combined mitigation measures could reduce emissions by 48.3%. The most effective mitigation measures should focus on decreasing N-fertilizer use per ha for feed crop production and increasing feed crop yield, adjusting herd structure for milk productivity and using localized feed inputs. All mitigation measures had a positive impact on farm profit, except for the improved manure management (changing the farms using manure composting to a static compost system and changing natural storage to direct land application). Therefore, the combination of crop and dairy production and manure management offer the greatest potential to reduce the GHG emissions from Inner Mongolia dairy farm systems. Economic subsidies and extension of findings to farmers might encourage more rapid adoption of these technologies.SIGNIFICANCE: The insights from our study can provide guidance for defining and prioritizing mitigation strategies for dairy production to reduce GHGs emission in other rapidly developing countries and regions with crop-based housed-cow dairy production.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interannual Evolution Characteristics of the Carbon and Nitrogen Footprints of Maize Production in Inner Mongolia
    Liang, Hongwei
    Cheng, Zhipeng
    Zhao, Ruixia
    Wang, Fugui
    Shi, Haibo
    Li, Yuan
    Wang, Zhen
    Bai, Lanfang
    Wang, Yongqiang
    Zhang, Jing
    Jin, Xiaoling
    Wang, Zhigang
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [2] Ammonia mitigation effects from the cow housing and manure storage chain on the nitrogen and carbon footprints of a typical dairy farm system on the North China Plain
    Zhang, Nannan
    Bai, Zhaohai
    Ledgard, Stewart
    Luo, Jiafa
    Ma, Lin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 280
  • [3] Nitrogen and carbon footprints of dairy farm systems in China and New Zealand, as influenced by productivity, feed sources and mitigations
    Ledgard, Stewart F.
    Wei, Sha
    Wang, Xiaoqin
    Falconer, Shelley
    Zhang, Nannan
    Zhang, Xiying
    Ma, Lin
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 213 : 155 - 163
  • [4] Mitigation Actions Scenarios Applied to the Dairy Farm Management Systems
    Rencricca, Giulia
    Froldi, Federico
    Moschini, Maurizio
    Trevisan, Marco
    Lamastra, Lucrezia
    FOODS, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [5] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF DAIRY FARM SYSTEMS IN ATLANTIC PROVINCES
    GUNN, TC
    CANADIAN FARM ECONOMICS, 1978, 13 (02): : 15 - 26
  • [6] Stochastic economic evaluation of dairy farm reproductive performance
    Kalantari, Afshin S.
    Cabrera, Victor E.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 95 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [7] PHOSPHORUS LOSSES AND ON-FARM MITIGATION OPTIONS FOR DAIRY FARMING SYSTEMS: A REVIEW
    Tayyab, U.
    McLean, F. A.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND PLANT SCIENCES-JAPS, 2015, 25 (02): : 318 - 327
  • [8] A Study on the Relationship Between Livestock Carbon Emission and Economic Growth in Inner Mongolia
    Niu, Xuanqi
    He, Mengyu
    Zhang, Yaoxin
    Luan, Zhiqiang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (23)
  • [9] Dairy cow longevity and farm economic performance: Evidence from Swedish dairy farms
    Adamie, B. A.
    Owusu-Sekyere, E.
    Lindberg, M.
    Agenas, S.
    Nyman, A. -K.
    Hansson, H.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (12) : 8926 - 8941
  • [10] Nitrogen use efficiencies, flows, and losses of typical dairy farming systems in Inner Mongolia
    Qili, Moge
    Zhao, Zhanqing
    Bao, Junwei
    Wu, Nier
    Gou, Baomin
    Ying, Ying
    Bilige, Batu
    Sun, Lin
    Xue, Yanlin
    Yang, Fuyu
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2024, 8