Using contribution analysis to evaluate health professions and health sciences programs

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Tammie [1 ,2 ]
Sarkar, Mahbub [1 ]
Bonham, Maxine [2 ]
Brock, Tina [3 ]
Brooks, Ingrid Ann [4 ]
Diug, Basia [5 ]
Ilic, Dragan [5 ]
Kumar, Arunaz [6 ]
Lau, Wee-Ming [7 ]
Lindley, Jennifer [1 ]
Morphet, Julia [4 ]
Simmons, Margaret [8 ]
Volders, Evelyn [2 ]
White, Paul J. [3 ]
Wright, Caroline [9 ]
Palermo, Claire [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Ctr Scholarship Hlth Educ, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Nutr Dietet & Food, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Fac Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Monash Univ Malaysia, Jeffrey Cheah Sch Med & Hlth Sci, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
[8] Monash Univ, Monash Rural Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[9] Monash Univ, Sch Primary & Allied Hlth, Dept Med Imaging & Radiat Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
contribution analysis; curriculum evaluation; learning and teaching; practice ready; health professions; health science; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; CURRICULUM;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2023.1146832
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction/backgroundCourse evaluation in health education is a common practice yet few comprehensive evaluations of health education exist that measure the impact and outcomes these programs have on developing health graduate capabilities.Aim/objectivesTo explore how curricula contribute to health graduate capabilities and what factors contribute to the development of these capabilities.MethodsUsing contribution analysis evaluation, a six-step iterative process, key stakeholders in the six selected courses were engaged in an iterative theory-driven evaluation. The researchers collectively developed a postulated theory-of-change. Then evidence from existing relevant documents were extracted using documentary analysis. Collated findings were presented to academic staff, industry representatives and graduates, where additional data was sought through focus group discussions - one for each discipline. The focus group data were used to validate the theory-of-change. Data analysis was conducted iteratively, refining the theory of change from one course to the next.ResultsThe complexity in teaching and learning, contributed by human, organizational and curriculum factors was highlighted. Advances in knowledge, skills, attitudes and graduate capabilities are non-linear and integrated into curriculum. Work integrated learning significantly contributes to knowledge consolidation and forming professional identities for health professional courses. Workplace culture and educators' passion impact on the quality of teaching and learning yet are rarely considered as evidence of impact.DiscussionCapturing the episodic and contextual learning moments is important to describe success and for reflection for improvement. Evidence of impact of elements of courses on future graduate capabilities was limited with the focus of evaluation data on satisfaction.ConclusionContribution analysis has been a useful evaluation method to explore the complexity of the factors in learning and teaching that influence graduate capabilities in health-related courses.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条