Plastic Contaminant Detection in Aerial Imagery of Cotton Fields Using Deep Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Yadav, Pappu Kumar [1 ]
Thomasson, J. Alex [2 ]
Hardin, Robert [1 ]
Searcy, Stephen W. [1 ]
Braga-Neto, Ulisses [3 ]
Popescu, Sorin C. [4 ]
Rodriguez III, Roberto [5 ]
Martin, Daniel E. [6 ]
Enciso, Juan [1 ]
Meza, Karem [7 ]
White, Emma L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, Starkville, MS 39762 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecol & Conservat Biol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[5] Univ Hawaii Hilo, Spatial Data Anal & Visualizat Lab, Hilo, HI 96720 USA
[6] ARS, Aerial Applicat Technol Res, USDA, College Stn, TX 77845 USA
[7] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 07期
关键词
plastic contamination; cotton field; YOLOv5; unmanned aircraft systems (UAS); CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture13071365
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Plastic shopping bags are often discarded as litter and can be carried away from roadsides and become tangled on cotton plants in farm fields. This rubbish plastic can end up in the cotton at the gin if not removed before harvest. These bags may not only cause problems in the ginning process but might also become embedded in cotton fibers, reducing the quality and marketable value. Therefore, detecting, locating, and removing the bags before the cotton is harvested is required. Manually detecting and locating these bags in cotton fields is a tedious, time-consuming, and costly process. To solve this, this paper shows the application of YOLOv5 to detect white and brown colored plastic bags tangled at three different heights in cotton plants (bottom, middle, top) using Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS)-acquired Red, Green, Blue (RGB) images. It was found that an average white and brown bag could be detected at 92.35% and 77.87% accuracies and a mean average precision (mAP) of 87.68%. Similarly, the trained YOLOv5 model, on average, could detect 94.25% of the top, 49.58% of the middle, and only 5% of the bottom bags. It was also found that both the color of the bags (p < 0.001) and their height on cotton plants (p < 0.0001) had a significant effect on detection accuracy. The findings reported in this paper can help in the autonomous detection of plastic contaminants in cotton fields and potentially speed up the mitigation efforts, thereby reducing the amount of contaminants in cotton gins.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of Plastic Greenhouses by Using Deep Learning Model for Aerial Orthoimages
    Yoon, Byunghyun
    Seong, Seonkyeong
    Choi, Jaewan
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 39 (02) : 183 - 192
  • [2] Aerial imagery pile burn detection using deep learning: The FLAME dataset
    Shamsoshoara, Alireza
    Afghah, Fatemeh
    Razi, Abolfazl
    Zheng, Liming
    Fule, Peter Z.
    Blasch, Erik
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2021, 193
  • [3] Early identification of cotton fields using mosaicked aerial multispectral imagery
    Yang, Chenghai
    Suh, Charles P. -C.
    Westbrook, John K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 11
  • [4] Livestock Detection and Counting in Kenyan Rangelands Using Aerial Imagery and Deep Learning Techniques
    Ocholla, Ian A.
    Pellikka, Petri
    Karanja, Faith
    Vuorinne, Ilja
    Vaisanen, Tuomas
    Boitt, Mark
    Heiskanen, Janne
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (16)
  • [5] Aerial Imagery Paddy Seedlings Inspection Using Deep Learning
    Anuar, Mohamed Marzhar
    Halin, Alfian Abdul
    Perumal, Thinagaran
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [6] Scene and Environment Monitoring Using Aerial Imagery and Deep Learning
    Oghaz, Mahdi Maktabdar
    Razaak, Manzoor
    Kerdegari, Hamideh
    Argyriou, Vasileios
    Remagnino, Paolo
    [J]. 2019 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING IN SENSOR SYSTEMS (DCOSS), 2019, : 362 - 369
  • [7] Deep object detection for waterbird monitoring using aerial imagery
    Kabra, Krish
    Xiong, Alexander
    Li, Wenbin
    Luo, Minxuan
    Lu, William
    Yu, Tianjiao
    Yu, Jiahui
    Singh, Dhananjay
    Garcia, Raul
    Tang, Maojie
    Arnold, Hank
    Vallery, Anna
    Gibbons, Richard
    Barman, Arko
    [J]. 2022 21ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS, ICMLA, 2022, : 455 - 460
  • [8] Systematic evaluation of deep learning based detection frameworks for aerial imagery
    Sommer, Lars
    Steinmann, Lucas
    Schumann, Arne
    Beyerer, Juergen
    [J]. AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XXVIII, 2018, 10648
  • [9] Cotton Stand Counting from Unmanned Aerial System Imagery Using MobileNet and CenterNet Deep Learning Models
    Lin, Zhe
    Guo, Wenxuan
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Sheep Detection in Aerial Imagery
    Ismail, Muhammad Syahmie
    Samad, Rosdiyana
    Pebrianti, Dwi
    Mustafa, Mahfuzah
    Abdullah, Nor Rul Hasma
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING, ICOM 2024, 2024, : 234 - 239