Optical Trocar Access for Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty in Children with Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Koga, Hiroyuki [1 ,2 ]
Yamada, Shunsuke [1 ]
Takeda, Masahiro [1 ]
Ochi, Takanori [1 ]
Seo, Shogo [1 ]
Shibuya, Soichi [1 ]
Yazaki, Yuta [1 ]
Fujiwara, Naho [1 ]
Arii, Rumi [1 ]
Lane, Geoffrey J. [1 ]
Yamataka, Atsuyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Juntendo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat Gen & Urogenital Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Juntendo Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat Gen & Urogenital Surg, Tokyo 1138421, Japan
关键词
retroperitoneoscopic surgery; ureteropelvic junction obstruction; robotic surgery; da Vinci; optical trocar; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1089/lap.2023.0444
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Retroperitoneal robotic-assisted pyeloplasty (ret-RAP) for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) requires a larger retroperitoneal space (RS) to maintain specified distances between robotic (da Vinci) trocars and between trocars and the region of interest. A modified closed technique (MOT) and conventional closed technique (COT) were compared for creating an adequate RS with optical trocars. Methods: RS access in children with UPJO who underwent ret-RAP (n = 30) was MOT (n = 15) and COT (n = 15). All patients were positioned laterally. For MOT, a 5 mm optical trocar was inserted at the angle formed between the 12th rib and the erector spinae muscles. As the trocar was advanced under direct vision, it pierced the superficial subcutaneous layer, Scarpa's fascia, lumbar fascia, internal/external oblique and transversus abdominalis muscles, and the posterior renal fascia. Once in the RS, the tip of the scope was used for blunt dissection of perirenal fat, the tip was withdrawn until it was outside the perirenal fascia, and used to dissect toward the anterior abdomen in the pararenal fat layer. Results: Ages and weights at ret-RAP were similar (MOT: 5.6 +/- 1.8 years versus COT: 7.8 +/- 4.6 years; MOT: 20.6 +/- 10.1 kg versus COT: 27.6 +/- 13.9 kg). Times for RS access were similar (MOT: 1.6 +/- 0.5 minutes versus COT: 1.9 +/- 0.7 minutes), but RS expansion was significantly quicker in MOT (32.3 +/- 8.7 minutes versus 52.0 +/- 15.1 minutes; P < .001). Peritoneal injury caused carbon dioxide leakage in 4 of 15 COT cases and 0 of 15 MOT cases. Conclusion: RS expansion with MOT was safer because there were no peritoneal injuries and MOT was quicker than COT.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 655
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Nephropexy for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction and Nephroptosis
    Boylu, Ugur
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    Thomas, Raju
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 19 (03): : 379 - 382
  • [2] Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study
    Blanc, Thomas
    Abbo, Olivier
    Vatta, Fabrizio
    Grosman, Julien
    Marquant, Fabienne
    Elie, Caroline
    Juricic, Melodie
    Laraqui, Samia
    Broch, Aline
    Arnaud, Alexis
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 134 - 140
  • [3] Day surgery for transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. A multicentre study
    Trypens, A.
    Faure, A.
    Merdrignac, V.
    Duchesne, C.
    Rod, J.
    Ballouhay, Q.
    Abbo, O.
    Botto, N.
    Arnaud, A.
    Blanc, T.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S830 - S830
  • [4] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty as management for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a comparison study with primary pyeloplasty
    Zhang, Peng
    Shi, Taoping
    Fam, Xenginn
    Gu, Liangyou
    Xuan, Yundong
    Yang, Luojia
    Wang, Baojun
    Ai, Xing
    Jia, Zhuomin
    Li, Hongzhao
    Zhang, Xu
    Ma, Xin
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1278 - 1285
  • [5] Robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty to treat ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Patel, Trushar
    Berger, Aaron D.
    Phillips, Courney K.
    Shah, Ojas
    Stifelman, Michael
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A137 - A137
  • [6] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), is an alternative to open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population
    S. Cohen
    G. Raisin
    D. Dothan
    J. Jaber
    S. Kocherov
    B. Chertin
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1117 - 1122
  • [7] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP), for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), is an alternative to open pyeloplasty in the pediatric population
    Cohen, S.
    Raisin, G.
    Dothan, D.
    Jaber, J.
    Kocherov, S.
    Chertin, B.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (05) : 1117 - 1122
  • [8] Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Ebert, Kristin M.
    Nicassio, Lauren
    Alpert, Seth A.
    Ching, Christina B.
    Dajusta, Daniel G.
    Fuchs, Molly E.
    McLeod, Daryl J.
    Jayanthi, Venkata R.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2020, 16 (06) : 845.e1 - 845.e6
  • [9] Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - How should success be determined?
    Lien, Marie
    Aesoy, Mathias Sorstrand
    Hjelle, Karin
    Almas, Bjarte
    Juliebo-Jones, Patrick
    Ulvik, Oyvind
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2024, 96 (02) : 12431
  • [10] The application of artificial technology in pediatric pyeloplasty the efficacy analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Hu, Zhongli
    Chen, Shan
    Wang, Zhihong
    Xu, Di
    Zhang, Xiaolang
    Lin, Yang
    Zhang, Lin
    Wang, Jianbin
    Li, Lizhi
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2023, 11