The Relevance of life cycle assessment to decision-making in companies and public authorities

被引:5
|
作者
Subal, Luc [1 ]
Braunschweig, Arthur [2 ]
Hellweg, Stefanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, John von Neumann Weg 9, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] E2 Management Consulting AG, Wehntalerstr 3, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Environmental decision-making; LCA relevance; LCA in organizations; LCA in management; Impact of LCA results; ENVIRONMENTAL BURDEN; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENERGY DEMAND; IMPLEMENTATION; LCA; PERFORMANCE; INDICATOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140520
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is increasingly used, but studies about the influence on decision making and the actual impact of LCA are so far lacking. The goal of this study is therefore to present a first assessment of the influence of LCAs within decision-making and the real-world impact of LCAs. For this purpose, a semi-quantitative questionnaire and several qualitative interviews were performed with decision makers from industry and governmental agencies. The results show that half of the surveyed organizations use LCA frequently in decision-making, while the other half only implement LCA in a few decision situations. In companies, LCA is applied for product development and optimization as well as strategic decisions. The level of integration of LCA in decision-making processes showed a positive correlation with the consideration of LCA results and the impact of LCA results on decision outcomes. In public authorities (analysis restricted to Swiss authorities), environmental aspects are always considered during the development of new regulations, but the LCA results are not the only aspects influencing the decision outcome. Other aspects are the costs and the environmental awareness of the decision-maker. Three quarters of all organizations use climate change as one environmental indicator, mostly (in 68% of the responding organizations) in combination with other environmental indicators. Four main reasons limit the influence of LCA within decision-making: lower priority of environmental aspects compared to other decision criteria, complex LCA methods, complex results, and a lack of data to perform a reliable LCA. Future research could be conducted with a specific focus on an industrial sector, a country, or a specific application area to allow in-depth insights of decision-making practices.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Assessment in Regulatory Decision-Making
    Bosso, Christopher
    Isaacs, Jacqueline
    Walker, William
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY (ISSST), 2012,
  • [2] Evaluation and decision-making processes in life cycle assessment
    Grahl, Birgit
    Schmincke, Eva
    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1996, 1 (01): : 32 - 35
  • [3] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT AS A PROJECT DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Quintana, A.
    Guillen-Guillamon, I
    REACTIVE PROACTIVE ARCHITECTURE, 2018, : 244 - 248
  • [4] A framework for coupling a participatory approach and life cycle assessment for public decision-making in rural territory management
    Jouini, Meriem
    Burte, Julien
    Biard, Yannick
    Benaissa, Nadhira
    Amara, Hajer
    Sinfort, Carole
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 655 : 1017 - 1027
  • [5] Life Cycle Assessment as a decision-making tool: Practitioner and managerial considerations
    Pryshlakivsky, Jonathan
    Searcy, Cory
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 309
  • [6] Life cycle assessment, a decision-making tool in wastewater treatment facilities
    Ahmed, Mohamed Tawfic
    WASTEWATER REUSED - RISK ASSESSMENT, DECISION-MAKING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY, 2007, : 305 - +
  • [7] Using Life Cycle Assessment to Inform Decision-Making for Sustainable Buildings
    Vandenbroucke, Mieke
    Galle, Waldo
    De Temmerman, Niels
    Debacker, Wim
    Paduart, Anne
    BUILDINGS, 2015, 5 (02) : 536 - 559
  • [9] "The Computer Says No!" - A Case Study on Automated Decision-making in Public Authorities
    Wihlborg, Elin
    Larsson, Hannu
    Hedstrom, Karin
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS 2016), 2016, : 2903 - 2912
  • [10] THE PRACTICE OF DECISION-MAKING OF PUBLIC HEALTH AUTHORITIES IN POLAND ON REIMBURSEMENT OF ORPHAN DRUGS
    Skora, K.
    Bochenek, T.
    Augustynska, J.
    Walczak, J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (09) : A564 - A564