Editors as Gatekeepers: One Medical Education Journal's Efforts to Resist Racism in Scholarly Publishing

被引:7
|
作者
Wyatt, Tasha R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bullock, Justin L. [4 ]
Andon, Anabelle [5 ]
Odukoya, Erica J. [6 ]
Torres, Carlos G. [7 ]
Gingell, Gareth [8 ]
Han, Heeyoung [9 ]
Zaidi, Zareen [10 ]
Mylona, Elza [11 ]
Torre, Dario [12 ]
Cianciolo, Anna T. [13 ]
机构
[1] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth Profess Educ, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
[2] Ctr Hlth Profess Educ, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Bethesda, MD USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Columbia Univ Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY USA
[6] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[8] Univ Texas Austin, Med Educ, Dell Med Sch, Austin, TX USA
[9] Southern Illinois Univ, Med Educ, Sch Med, Springfield, IL USA
[10] George Washington Univ, Med, Washington, DC USA
[11] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Internal Med, Norfolk, VA USA
[12] Univ Cent Florida, Coll Med, Med, Orlando, FL USA
[13] Southern Illinois Univ, Sch Med, Med Educ, Springfield, IL USA
关键词
COLOR-BLIND;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000005303
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposeJournals have begun to expand the racial diversity of editors as a first step to countering institutional racism. Given the power editors hold as gatekeepers, a diverse team helps ensure that minoritized scholars have equal opportunity to contribute. In 2021, Teaching and Learning in Medicine (TLM) created an editorial internship for racially minoritized individuals. This study examines the first 6 months of this program to better understand its creation and initial successes.MethodThe authors employed critical collaborative autoethnography, a qualitative methodology, focusing on the underlying assumptions around power and hierarchy that are implicit in the design and implementation of the TLM internship. Participants included 13 TLM editorial board members (10 internship selection committee members, 3 mentors, 2 independent researchers), 3 external selection committee members, and 3 interns, with some holding multiple roles. Ten participants served as authors of this report. Data included archival emails, planning documents, and focus groups. The initial analysis explored what happened and how and was followed by a thematic analysis in which participants reflected on their responsibility for implementing an antiracist program.ResultsWhile the program developed interns' editorial skills, which they greatly valued, and diversified the TLM editorial board, it did not achieve the goal of fostering antiracism. Mentors focused on conducting joint peer reviews with interns, assuming that racial experiences can and should be separate from the editorial process, thus working within, rather than trying to change, the existing racist system.ConclusionsGiven these findings, greater structural change is needed to disrupt the existing racist system. These experiences underscore the importance of recognizing the harmful impact a race-neutral lens can have on antiracist efforts. Moving forward, TLM will implement lessons learned ahead of offering the internship again with the goal of creating the transformative change intended with the creation of the program.
引用
收藏
页码:1406 / 1412
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条