Do FinTech Mortgage Lenders Fill the Credit Gap? Evidence from Natural Disasters

被引:6
|
作者
Allen, Linda [1 ]
Shan, Yu [2 ]
Shen, Yao [1 ]
机构
[1] Baruch Coll, Zicklin Sch Business, New York, NY 10010 USA
[2] Syracuse Univ, Whitman Sch Management, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
关键词
BANKS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1017/S002210902200120X
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
After exogenous demand shocks caused by natural disasters, FinTech lenders are more responsive to increased demand for reconstruction mortgages than traditional banks and non-FinTech shadow banks. Both FinTech and traditional banks increase credit supply, but FinTech supply is more elastic without increases in risk-adjusted interest rates or delinquency rates. Comparing lending supply channels, banks respond to regulatory incentives to lend to damaged areas, whereas FinTech lenders supply more credit when traditional banks rely more on balance sheet financing and physical branch networks. Compared to traditional banks, FinTech lenders increase supply elasticity more aggressively in response to local competitive pressure.
引用
收藏
页码:3342 / 3383
页数:42
相关论文
共 50 条