Influence of implant restorative emergence angle and contour on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
Atieh, Momen A. [1 ,2 ]
Shah, Maanas [1 ]
Ameen, Mohammed [1 ]
Tawse-Smith, Andrew [2 ]
Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed Bin Rashid Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Hamdan Bin Mohammed Coll Dent Med, Dubai Healthcare City, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
[2] Univ Otago, Sir John Walsh Res Inst, Fac Dent, Dunedin, New Zealand
[3] Emirates Hlth Serv, Dept Dent Serv, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
emergence angle; emergence profile; meta-analysis; peri-implantitis; systematic review; CROWN CONTOUR; DISEASES; RISK; ASSOCIATION; PREVALENCE; DESIGN; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/cid.13214
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundImplant restorative emergence angle and profile may have a negative impact on peri-implant marginal bone level and may increase the risk of developing peri-implantitis. However, the role of these prosthetic features on peri-implant health is still unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of implant restorations with an emergence angle of >30 degrees in comparison to those with <= 30 degrees in terms of changes in peri-implant marginal bone level, periodontal parameters, and prevalence rate of peri-implantitis. MethodsElectronic databases were searched to identify observational studies that compared implant restorations with an emergence angle of >30 degrees to those with <= 30 degrees. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. ResultsFour studies with 912 dental implants in 397 participants were included in the present review. Of these, 455 implants had restorations with an emergence angle of >30 degrees, while the remaining implants had restorative emergence angle of <= 30 degrees. The follow-up time varied between 3.8 and 10.9 years. Implant restorations with an emergence angle of <= 30 degrees were associated with less changes in peri-implant marginal bone level compared to those with emergence angle of >30 degrees. The difference, however, was not statistically significant (mean difference 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to 1.72; p = 0.09). In platform-matched implants, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant in favor of implant restorations with emergence angle of <= 30 degrees. In terms of emergence profile, implant restorations with convex profile had significantly higher rate of peri-implantitis (57.8%) compared to implant restorations with concave or straight profile (21.3%) (risk ratio 2.32; 95% CI 1.12-4.82; p = 0.02). ConclusionsWithin the limitation of this review, implant restorations with an emergence angles of >30 degrees or <= 30 degrees seem to have no significant influence on peri-implant marginal bone level. Platform-matched implants with an emergence angle of <= 30 degrees may have positive effects on the peri-implant marginal bone level changes, but the evidence support is of low to moderate certainty.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 852
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Influence of abutment height on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Zhaozhao
    Lin, Cho-Ying
    Li, Junying
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Yu, Haiyang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 122 (01): : 14 - +
  • [2] LEVELS OF SMOKING AND PERI-IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Afshari, Zohreh
    Yaghini, Jaber
    Naseri, Roohollah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2022, 22 (03)
  • [3] Outcome of supportive peri-implant therapy on the rates of peri-implant diseases and marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Atieh, Momen A.
    AlAli, Fawaghi
    Alsabeeha, Nabeel H. M.
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 52 (02): : 122 - 131
  • [4] Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    del Amo, Fernando Suarez-Lopez
    Lin, Guo-Hao
    Monje, Alberto
    Galindo-Moreno, Pablo
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 87 (06) : 690 - 699
  • [5] The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Caricasulo, Riccardo
    Malchiodi, Luciano
    Ghensi, Paolo
    Fantozzi, Giuliano
    Cucchi, Alessandro
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (04) : 653 - 664
  • [6] The influence of vertical ridge augmentation techniques on peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cucchi, Alessandro
    Maiani, Francesco
    Franceschi, Debora
    Sassano, Michele
    Fiorino, Antonino
    Urban, Istvan A.
    Corinaldesi, Giuseppe
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 26 (01) : 15 - 65
  • [7] Systemic risk factors for peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Clementini, M.
    Rossetti, P. H. O.
    Penarrocha, D.
    Micarelli, C.
    Bonachela, W. C.
    Canullo, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 43 (03) : 323 - 334
  • [8] The influence of abutment disconnections on peri-implant marginal bone: A systematic review
    de Carvalho Barbara, Joao Gabriel
    Luz, Diogo
    Vianna, Katia
    Barboza, Eliane Porto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2019, 12 (03) : 283 - 296
  • [9] Influence of Laser-Microtextured Surface Collar on Marginal Bone Loss and Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Zhaozhao
    Zhang, Yujiao
    Li, Junying
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    Yu, Haiyang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 88 (07) : 651 - 662
  • [10] The effect of supportive care in preventing peri-implant diseases and implant loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Cho-Ying
    Chen, Zhaozhao
    Pan, Whei-Lin
    Wang, Hom-Lay
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (08) : 714 - 724