共 50 条
Examining the Interrelationships Among Suicide Cognitions, Suicidal Ideation, and Theoretically Derived Protective Factors
被引:7
|作者:
Oakey-Frost, Nicolas
[1
]
Cowan, Tovah
[1
]
Moscardini, Emma H.
[1
]
Pardue-Bourgeois, Sarah
[1
]
de Beurs, Derek
[2
]
Cohen, Alex
[1
]
Bryan, Craig J.
[3
]
Tucker, Raymond P.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res NIVEL, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Ohio State Univ, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词:
Network analysis;
protective factors;
suicidal ideation;
suicide cognitions;
KILLING YOURSELF;
POSITIVE AFFECT;
SOCIAL SUPPORT;
STAYING ALIVE;
SELF-ESTEEM;
REASONS;
LIFE;
RISK;
HOPE;
BEHAVIOR;
D O I:
10.1080/13811118.2022.2096521
中图分类号:
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号:
100205 ;
摘要:
Introduction Several protective factors for mitigating suicidal ideation (SI) such as positive affect, reasons for living, purpose in life, meaning in life, gratitude, grit, optimism, social support, and hope have been identified and received empirical support. However, few studies have examined the interrelationships of these protective factors and the identification of protective factors most closely linked to lower levels of SI may be useful for both theory-building initiatives and improvement of suicide-specific interventions. Network analysis offers an approach for testing the relation among these constructs, SI, and suicide risk factors. Methods A sample N = 557 undergraduate students oversampled for lifetime SI completed a cross-sectional, online survey. The data was used to estimate an undirected, cross-sectional network of the aforementioned protective factors. Results The resulting inferred network implicates strong negative influence of suicide cognitions, but not recent SI, and the strong positive influence of presence of meaning in life, trait hope, and low negative affect. Conclusions Implications for dimensionality of SI versus suicide cognitions, targeting presence of meaning in life, trait hope, and negative affect in treatment, and cross-cultural variations in reasons for living are discussed. The study is limited by the cross-sectional and convenience sampling methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 1001
页数:18
相关论文