MetaIPM: Placing integral projection models into a metapopulation framework

被引:0
|
作者
Erickson, Richard A. [1 ]
Peirce, James P. [2 ]
Sandland, Greg J. [3 ]
Thompson, Hannah M. [1 ]
Coulter, Alison A. [4 ]
Glover, David C. [5 ]
机构
[1] US Geol Survey, Upper Midwest Environm Sci Ctr, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Math & Stat, La Crosse, WI USA
[3] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biol, La Crosse, WI USA
[4] South Dakota State Univ, Dept Nat Resource Management, Brookings, SD USA
[5] Illinois Dept Nat Resources, Havana, IL USA
来源
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 14卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
connected habitats; integral projection model; length-based models; network models; population ecology; POPULATION-DYNAMICS; MANAGEMENT; CARPS;
D O I
10.1111/2041-210X.14156
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Metapopulation models include spatial population dynamics such as dispersion and migration between subpopulations. Integral projection models (IPMs) can include demographic rates as a function of size. Traditionally, metapopulation models do not included detailed populaiton models such as IPMs. In some situations, both local population dynamics (e.g. size-based survival) and spatial dynamics are important. 2. We present a Python package, MetaIPM, which places IPMs into a metapopulation framework, and allow users to readily construct and apply these models that combine local population dynamics within a metapopulation framework. 3. MetaIPM includes an IPM for each subpopulation that is connected to other subpopulations via a metapopulation movement model. These movements can include dispersion, migration or other patterns. The IPM can include for size-specific demographic rates (e.g. survival, recruitment) as well as management actions, such as length-based harvest (e.g. gear specific capture sizes, varying slot limits across political boundaries). The model also allows for changes in metapopulation connectivity between locations, such as a fish passage ladders to enhance movement or deterrents to reduce movement. Thus, resource managers can use MetaIPM to compare different management actions such as the harvest gear type (which can be length-specific) and harvest locations. 4. We demonstrate how MetaIPM may be applied to inform managers seeking to limit the spread of an invasive species in a system with important metapopulation dynamics. Specifically, we compared removal lengths (all length fish versus longer fish only) for an invasive fish population in a fragmented, inland river system. MetaIPM allowed users to compare the importance of harvesting source populations away from the invasion front, as well as species at the invasion front. The model would also allow for future comparisons of different deterrent placement locations in the system. 5. Moving beyond our example system, we describe how MetaIPM can be applied to other species, systems and management approaches. The MetaIPM packages includes Jupyter Notebooks documenting the package as well as a second set of JupyterNotebooks showing the application of the package to our example system.
引用
收藏
页码:2243 / 2249
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Placing empirical limits on metapopulation models for terrestrial plants
    Scheiner, SM
    ReyBenayas, JM
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1997, 11 (03) : 275 - 288
  • [2] Placing empirical limits on metapopulation models for terrestrial plants
    SAMUEL M. Scheiner
    JOSE´ M. Rey-Benayas
    [J]. Evolutionary Ecology, 1997, 11 : 275 - 288
  • [3] Placing empirical limits on metapopulation models for terrestrial plants
    Scheiner, S. M.
    Rey-Benayas, J. M.
    [J]. Evolutionary Ecology, 11 (03):
  • [4] Developing integral projection models for ecotoxicology
    Pollesch, N. L.
    Flynn, K. M.
    Kadlec, S. M.
    Swintek, J. A.
    Raimondo, S.
    Etterson, M. A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2022, 464
  • [5] Perturbation approaches for integral projection models
    Griffith, Alden B.
    [J]. OIKOS, 2017, 126 (12) : 1675 - 1686
  • [6] IPMpack: an R package for integral projection models
    Metcalf, C. Jessica E.
    McMahon, Sean M.
    Salguero-Gomez, Roberto
    Jongejans, Eelke
    [J]. METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2013, 4 (02): : 195 - 200
  • [7] Integral projection models for species with complex demography
    Ellner, SP
    Rees, M
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2006, 167 (03): : 410 - 428
  • [8] A critical comparison of integral projection and matrix projection models for demographic analysis
    Doak, Daniel F.
    Waddle, Ellen
    Langendorf, Ryan E.
    Louthan, Allison M.
    Isabelle Chardon, Nathalie
    Dibner, Reilly R.
    Keinath, Douglas A.
    Lombardi, Elizabeth
    Steenbock, Christopher
    Shriver, Robert K.
    Linares, Cristina
    Begona Garcia, Maria
    Funk, W. Chris
    Fitzpatrick, Sarah W.
    Morris, William F.
    DeMarche, Megan L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2021, 91 (02)
  • [9] A critical comparison of integral projection and matrix projection models for demographic analysis: Reply
    Doak, Daniel F.
    Waddle, Ellen
    Langendorf, Ryan E.
    Louthan, Allison M.
    Chardon, Nathalie Isabelle
    Dibner, Reilly
    Shriver, Robert K.
    Linares, Cristina
    Garcia, Maria Begona
    Fitzpatrick, Sarah W.
    Morris, William F.
    DeMarche, Megan L.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2022, 103 (10)
  • [10] Towards robust evolutionary inference with integral projection models
    Janeiro, M. J.
    Coltman, D. W.
    Festa-Bianchet, M.
    Pelletier, F.
    Morrissey, M. B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (02) : 270 - 288