Patient Preferences for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Daneng [1 ]
Tan, Ruoding [2 ]
Hernandez, Sairy [2 ]
Reilly, Norelle [2 ]
Bussberg, Cooper [3 ]
Mansfield, Carol [3 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[3] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
关键词
discrete choice; stated preferences; survival; health-related quality of life; ATEZOLIZUMAB PLUS BEVACIZUMAB; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; REPORTED OUTCOMES; NON-INFERIORITY; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-III; SORAFENIB; LENVATINIB;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15051470
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Several treatments are available for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is important to understand patients' treatment priorities and goals regarding such treatment options. In a survey study, we explored 200 patients' preferences for six different features of HCC treatments: months of additional survival, months of maintained daily function, severity of hand-foot syndrome, severity of high blood pressure, risk of bleeding in the digestive tract, and how the medicine is taken. Of the features included in the survey, it was most important to respondents to avoid moderate-to-severe hand-foot syndrome and moderate-to-severe high blood pressure. Respondents considered 10 additional months of maintaining daily functioning to be as important or more important than 10 additional months of survival. For some patients with HCC, maintaining quality of life and avoiding moderate-to-severe side effects may be as important or more important than a medicine's survival benefit. Treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have varying benefit-risk profiles. We elicited 200 US patients' preferences for attributes associated with various first-line systemic treatments for unresectable HCC in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) survey. Respondents answered nine DCE questions, each offering a choice between two hypothetical treatment profiles defined by six attributes with varying levels: overall survival (OS), months of maintained daily function, severity of palmar-plantar syndrome, severity of hypertension, risk of digestive-tract bleeding, and mode and frequency of administration. A random-parameters logit model was used to analyze the preference data. Patients regarded an additional 10 months of maintaining daily function without decline to be as important or more important than 10 additional months of OS, on average. Respondents valued avoiding moderate-to-severe palmar-plantar syndrome and hypertension more than extended OS. A respondent would require >10 additional months of OS (the greatest increase presented in the study) on average to offset the increased burden of adverse events. Patients with unresectable HCC prioritize avoiding adverse events that would severely impact their quality of life over mode and frequency of administration or digestive-tract bleeding risk. For some patients with unresectable HCC, maintaining daily functioning is as important or more important than the survival benefit of a treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient preferences for metastatic renal cell carcinoma treatments: a discrete-choice experiment
    Gonzalez, Juan M.
    Doan, Justin
    Gebben, David J.
    Fishman, Mayer
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 : 22 - 23
  • [2] Patient and caregiver preferences for haemophilia treatments: A discrete-choice experiment
    Garcia, Viridiana Cano
    Mansfield, Carol
    Pierce, Anna
    Leach, Colton
    Smith, Jane Cavanaugh
    Afonso, Marion
    [J]. HAEMOPHILIA, 2024, 30 (02) : 375 - 387
  • [3] Patient Preferences for Preventive Migraine Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Mansfield, Carol
    Gebben, David J.
    Sutphin, Jessie
    Tepper, Stewart J.
    Schwedt, Todd J.
    Sapra, Sandhya
    Shah, Neel
    [J]. HEADACHE, 2019, 59 (05): : 715 - 726
  • [4] Patient preferences for chronic lymphocytic leukemia treatments: a discrete-choice experiment
    Ravelo, Arliene
    Myers, Kelley
    Brumble, Robyn
    Bussberg, Cooper
    Koffman, Brian
    Manzoor, Beenish S.
    Biondo, Juliana M.
    Mansfield, Carol
    [J]. FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2024,
  • [5] PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR DIALYSIS MODALITIES: A DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Walker, R.
    Morton, R.
    Palmer, S.
    Marshall, M.
    Tong, A.
    Howard, K.
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 22 : 48 - 48
  • [6] Quantifying patient preferences for systemic atopic dermatitis treatments using a discrete-choice experiment
    Boeri, Marco
    Sutphin, Jessie
    Hauber, Brett
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Romero, William
    Di Bonaventura, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2022, 33 (03) : 1449 - 1458
  • [7] Patient Preferences for Injectable Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Poulos, Christine
    Kinter, Elizabeth
    Yang, Jui-Chen
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Posner, Joshua
    Reder, Anthony T.
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2016, 9 (02): : 171 - 180
  • [8] A discrete-choice experiment to determine patient preferences for injectable multiple sclerosis treatments in Germany
    Poulos, Christine
    Kinter, Elizabeth
    Yang, Jui-Chen
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Posner, Joshua
    Gleissner, Erika
    Muehlbacher, Axel
    Kieseier, Bernd
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS, 2016, 9 (02) : 95 - 104
  • [9] Patient and physician preferences for multiple sclerosis treatments in Germany: A discrete-choice experiment study
    Poulos, Christine
    Wakeford, Craig
    Kinter, Elizabeth
    Mange, Brennan
    Schenk, Thomas
    Jhaveri, Mehul
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL-EXPERIMENTAL TRANSLATIONAL AND CLINICAL, 2020, 6 (01)
  • [10] Patient Preferences for Injectable Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in the United States: A Discrete-Choice Experiment
    Christine Poulos
    Elizabeth Kinter
    Jui-Chen Yang
    John F. P. Bridges
    Joshua Posner
    Anthony T. Reder
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2016, 9 : 171 - 180