Which Localizing Strategy is the Most Cost-Effective in Reoperative Primary Hyperparathyroidism?

被引:0
|
作者
Gazivoda, Victor [1 ]
Prioli, Katherine M. [2 ]
Li, Albert C. [3 ]
Pizzi, Laura [2 ]
Laird, Amanda M. [1 ]
Beninato, Toni [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Div Surg Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Hlth Outcomes Policy & Econ, Piscataway, NJ USA
[3] Robert Wood Johnson Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sect Vasc & Intervent Radiol, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Sect Endocrine Surg, Surg, 195 Little Albany St, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
Cost-effective; Persistent/recurrent; Preoperative localization; Primary hyperparathyroidism; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; PARATHYROID-HORMONE; PREOPERATIVE LOCALIZATION; PERSISTENT; RECURRENT; SURGERY; EXPLORATION; ACCURACY; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.01.015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: 2%-10% of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) who undergo parathyroidectomy develop persistent/recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to determine which preoperative localization method is most cost-effective in reoperative PHPT. Methods: Clinical decision analytic models comparing cost-effectiveness of localizing studies in reoperative PHPT were constructed using TreeAge Pro. Cost and probability assumptions were varied via Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis (PSA) to test the robustness of the base case models. Results: Base case analysis of model 1 revealed ultrasound (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration with PTH assay as most cost-effective after localizing US. This was confirmed on PSA of model 1. Model 2 showed four-dimensional computed tomography (4D -CT) as most costeffective after negative US. If not localized by US, on PSA, 4D -CT was the next most costeffective test. Conclusions: US-guided FNA with PTH is the most cost-effective confirmatory test after US localization. 4D -CT should be considered as the next best test after negative US. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 555
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHICH OPTION IS THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE?
    Fautrel, B.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 : 42 - 42
  • [2] WHICH ROUTE TO NURSING IS MOST COST-EFFECTIVE
    FRIK, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 1988, 88 (06) : 880 - &
  • [3] Which combination therapy strategy for "naive" patients with chronic hepatitis C is the most cost-effective?.
    Buti, M
    Casado, MA
    Medina, M
    Fosbrook, L
    Esteban, R
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 34 (04) : 426A - 426A
  • [4] Which is the most cost-effective combination therapy strategy for naive patients with chronic hepatitis C?
    Buti, M
    Casado, MA
    Fosbrook, L
    Esteban, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 34 : 162 - 162
  • [5] Which BPH treatment is the most clinically efficacious and cost-effective?
    Fitzpatrick, John
    [J]. NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2007, 4 (07): : 358 - 359
  • [6] Laboratory workup for osteoporosis - Which tests are most cost-effective?
    Crandall, C
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 2003, 114 (03) : 35 - +
  • [7] Which BPH treatment is the most clinically efficacious and cost-effective?
    John Fitzpatrick
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2007, 4 : 358 - 359
  • [8] Which surgical treatment strategy for BPE is most cost effective?
    Armstrong, N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (02) : 194 - 194
  • [9] CONTROL OF ASCARIS INFECTION BY CHEMOTHERAPY - WHICH IS THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE OPTION
    GUYATT, HL
    CHAN, MS
    MEDLEY, GF
    BUNDY, DAP
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1995, 89 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [10] Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?
    Franchini, Mario
    Cianferoni, Luciano
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    Calonaci, Francesco
    Calzolari, Stefano
    Mazzini, Massimo
    Florio, Pasquale
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 91 (04) : 1499 - 1502