THE "INCLUSIVE LIBERALISM" OF CHRISTOPHER WOLFE: an analysis of argumentative freedom in public debates in the light of the Brazilian legal system

被引：0

作者：

Monteiro de Brito Filho, Jose Claudio ^{[1
]}

Pinheiro, Victor Sales ^{[2
,3
]}

Eiro do Nascimento, Juliana Oliveira ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Ctr Univ Estado CESUPA, PPGD, Belem, PA, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Para UFPA, Belem, Para, Brazil

[3] Ctr Univ Para CESUPA, Belem, Para, Brazil

[4] Ctr Univ Para CESUPA, Direitos Polit Publ & Desenvolvimento Reg, Belem, Para, Brazil

来源：

QUAESTIO IURIS | 2023年 / 16卷 / 02期

关键词：

Inclusive Liberalism; Inclusive Liberalism in Brazil; Freedom of expression; Brazilian Legal Order; Christopher Wolfe;

D O I：

10.12957/rqi.2023.65767

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This article analyzes the freedom of argumentation in public debates, along the lines proposed by Christopher Wolfe in an inclusive liberal model, in the light of the Brazilian legal system. The objective is to investigate to what extent the freedom to expose all kinds of reasons in public debates, defended in Christopher Wolfe's inclusive liberalism, has applicability in Brazil. The study contributes with an analysis of the possibility of applying, in Brazil, the proposal of a more inclusive liberalism in the scope of public debates, as defended by the author, since, currently, it is possible to verify a lack of reflections on the subject. Finally, the research concludes that the idea defended by the author, despite having a greater possibility of application in the North American context, in Brazil cannot be fully supported, requiring some adaptations. For that, the hypothetical-deductive method is used, with a documental and bibliographic analysis and a qualitative approach to the theme.

引用

页码：779 / 801

页数：23