Preoperative prophylactic antibiotics administration does not influence culture yield in revision shoulder arthroplasty

被引:1
|
作者
Stoll, Kurt [1 ,3 ]
Alfonsi III, Samuel [1 ,2 ]
Khan, Adam Z. [1 ]
Vaughan, Alayna [1 ]
Namdari, Surena [1 ]
机构
[1] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Philadelphia, PA USA
[3] 5916 South Smith St, Spokane, WA 99223 USA
关键词
Prophylactic antibiotics; revision shoulder arthroplasty; periprosthetic infection; antibiotic timing; culture positivity; prophy; lactic antibiotics; PROPIONIBACTERIUM-ACNES; DOXYCYCLINE; PREVENTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The importance of administrating prophylactic antibiotics prior to a surgical procedure is well established. Given the difficulty in diagnosing shoulder periprosthetic infections, which are more indolent in nature, some advocate holding prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures as there is a concern antibiotics may lead to a false negative culture result. The purpose of this study is to determine whether administration of antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty influences Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of revision shoulder arthroplasty cases performed at a single institution between 2015 and 2021. During the study period, each surgeon had a standardized protocol that dictated whether antibiotics were given or held prior to each revision surgery. Each case was categorized into either a Preculture antibiotic group, if antibiotics were administered prior to incision, or a Postculture antibiotic group if antibiotics were administered after incision and obtaining cultures. The International Consensus Meeting (ICM) scoring criteria provided by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society was used to categorize the probability of periprosthetic joint infection for each case. Culture positivity was calculated as the ratio of positive cultures and total number of cultures obtained.Results: One hundred twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. There were 48 patients in the Preculture group and 76 patients in the Postculture group. No significant difference in patient demographics or ICM criteria (P = .09) was observed between the 2 groups. With regard to culture positivity, there was no difference between the Preculture antibiotic group and the Postculture antibiotic group Conclusion: In the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty, timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly influence culture yield. This study supports the use of prophylactic antibiotics prior to obtaining cultures in revision shoulder arthroplasty.Level of evidence: Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study (c) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2366 / 2370
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Positive Culture Rate in Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Kelly, James D., II
    Hobgood, E. Rhett
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (09) : 2343 - 2348
  • [2] Revision shoulder arthroplasty: does the stem really matter?
    Cisneros, Luis Gerardo Natera
    Atoun, Ehud
    Abraham, Ruben
    Tsvieli, Oren
    Bruguera, Juan
    Levy, Ofer
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (05) : 747 - 755
  • [3] Preoperative Antibiotics Influence Culture Yield in the Treatment of Hand, Wrist, and Forearm Infections
    Dutton, Lauren K.
    Hinchcliff, Katharine M.
    Logli, Anthony L.
    Mallett, Katherine E.
    Suh, Gina A.
    Rizzo, Marco
    JBJS OPEN ACCESS, 2022, 7 (01)
  • [4] Use of regional administration of prophylactic antibiotics in total knee arthroplasty
    Symonds, Tristan
    Parkinson, Ben
    Hazratwala, Kaushik
    McEwen, Peter
    Wilkinson, Matthew
    Grant, Andrea
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 88 (09) : 848 - 853
  • [5] Intraosseous Regional Administration of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Wells, Zoe
    Zhu, Mark
    Young, Simon W.
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (05):
  • [6] Preoperative and intraoperative infection workup in apparently aseptic revision shoulder arthroplasty
    Updegrove, Gary F.
    Armstrong, April D.
    Kim, H. -M. Mike
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (03) : 491 - 500
  • [7] Revision of Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Hemiarthroplasty: Does it work?
    Sheth, Mihir
    Sholder, Daniel
    Abboud, Joseph
    Lazarus, Mark
    Williams, Gerald
    Namdari, Surena
    ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-ABJS, 2020, 8 (02): : 147 - 153
  • [8] Influence of preoperative factors on timing for bilateral shoulder arthroplasty
    Lee, Andrew
    Christmas, Kaitlyn N.
    Simon, Peter
    Bhatt, Fenil R.
    Lee, William E.
    Mighell, Mark A.
    Frankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (07) : S116 - S122
  • [9] Does preoperative disease severity influence outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy?
    Shah, Nihar S.
    Foote, Austin M.
    Steele, Chase A.
    Woods, Olivia A.
    Schumaier, Adam P.
    Sabbagh, Ramsey S.
    Schramm, Violet T.
    Grawe, Brian M.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (12) : 2745 - 2752
  • [10] Preoperative Doxycycline Does Not Reduce Propionibacterium acnes in Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Rao, Allison J.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Cvetanovich, Gregory L.
    O'Brien, Michael C.
    Newgren, Jon M.
    Cole, Brian J.
    Derma, Nikhil N.
    Nicholson, Gregory P.
    Romeo, Anthony A.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2018, 100 (11): : 958 - 964