A cost benefits analysis of the adoption of system of rice intensification: Evidence from smallholder rice farmers within an innovation platform in Oluch irrigation scheme, Kenya

被引:0
|
作者
Ouma, Matilda A. [1 ]
Ouma, Luke O. [2 ]
Ombati, Justus M. [3 ]
Onyango, Christopher A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Jaram Oginga Odinga Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Bondo, Kenya
[2] Egerton Univ, Dept Agr Educ & Extens, Egerton, Njoro, Kenya
[3] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Biostat Res Grp, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
MANAGEMENT; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0290759
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the wake of climate change and dwindling natural resources, system of rice intensification has been fronted as an approach to improve rice production in several countries. Besides the benefits such as improved rice productivity, reduced water usage that have widely been observed, there is need to quantify the economic benefits of system of rice intensification accrued to farmers, thereby promoting it as an innovation to improve livelihoods of rice farmers. This aim of this paper is to quantify the economic benefits of undertaking SRI among smallholder rice farmers. We introduced SRI among smallholder farmers in a rural setting in western Kenya, Oluch irrigation scheme, through an innovation platform approach. Over the period of four years (2016-2019), we quantify the benefits accrued to the uptake of the technology among adopters of the technology. Our comparisons are in reference to a baseline study conducted prior to the full-scale promotion of SRI in the study area. Our study findings reveal that the uptake of specific SRI practices increased by at least 30-80%, and acreage under rice farming increased by 50%. Besides, SRI required more production costs per acre (63% increase), although SRI had at least 28.6% higher return per shilling invested. Our findings underscore previous results in the literature that SRI is associated with not only productivity but also economic benefits justifying the need for scaling especially among smallholder farmers. Nonetheless, efficient approaches to scaling such promising technologies are necessary to enhance productivity and subsequently improve livelihoods.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Introduction of the System of Rice Intensification in Kenya: experiences from Mwea Irrigation Scheme
    Mati, B. M.
    Wanjogu, R.
    Odongo, B.
    Home, P. G.
    [J]. PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 9 (01) : 145 - 154
  • [2] Introduction of the System of Rice Intensification in Kenya: experiences from Mwea Irrigation Scheme
    B. M. Mati
    R. Wanjogu
    B. Odongo
    P. G. Home
    [J]. Paddy and Water Environment, 2011, 9 : 145 - 154
  • [3] Innovation platform for improving rice marketing decisions among smallholder farmers in Homa-Bay County, Kenya
    Ouma, Matilda A.
    Onyango, Christopher A.
    Ombati, Justus M.
    Mango, Nelson
    [J]. COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2020, 6 (01):
  • [4] Beyond adoption/rejection of agricultural innovations - Empirical evidence from smallholder rice farmers in Tanzania
    Mwaseba, D. L.
    Kaarhus, R.
    Johnsen, F. H.
    Mvena, Z. S. K.
    Mattee, A. Z.
    [J]. OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2006, 35 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [5] The roles of risk and ambiguity in the adoption of the system of rice intensification (SRI): evidence from Indonesia
    Takahashi, Kazushi
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2013, 5 (04) : 513 - 524
  • [6] The roles of risk and ambiguity in the adoption of the system of rice intensification (SRI): evidence from Indonesia
    Kazushi Takahashi
    [J]. Food Security, 2013, 5 : 513 - 524
  • [7] An analysis of the adoption of the "system of rice intensification" (SRI): why a homegrown technique has yet to take seed among rice farmers in Madagascar
    Moore, Maya
    Razafindrina, Kimmerling
    Mendez, V. Ernesto
    Niles, Meredith T.
    [J]. COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2024, 10 (01):
  • [8] INCENTIVIZING THE ADOPTION OF BIOFORTIFIED RICE FOR INCREASING FARMERS' PRODUCTIVITY AND INCOME DURING COVID19 ERA: EVIDENCE FROM SMALLHOLDER FARMERS IN NIGERIA
    Omeje, Emmanuel
    Okpukpara, Benjamin
    Okereke, Chukwuma
    Ume, Chukwuma
    Okpukpara, Victoria
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 22 (04) : 497 - 510
  • [9] Opportunity cost of adopting improved planted forage: Evidence from the adoption of Brachiaria grass among smallholder dairy farmers in Kenya
    Maina, Kevin W.
    Ritho, Cecilia N.
    Lukuyu, Ben A.
    Rao, Elizaphan James O.
    [J]. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS-AFJARE, 2022, 17 (01): : 48 - 63
  • [10] Does commitment to cooperatives affect the economic benefits of smallholder farmers? Evidence from rice cooperatives in the Western province of Zambia
    Donkor, Ebenezer
    Hejkrlik, Jiri
    [J]. AGREKON, 2021, 60 (04) : 408 - 423