A systematic review on food recommender systems

被引:9
|
作者
Bondevik, Jon Nicolas [1 ]
Bennin, Kwabena Ebo [1 ]
Babur, Onder [1 ,2 ]
Ersch, Carsten [3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Informat Technol Grp, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Univ Technol, Dept Math & Comp Sci, NL-5612 AZ Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Friesland Campina, Digital Res & Dev, NL-6708 WH Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Systematic literature review; SLR; Recommender system; Food recommender system; Food recommendation; INFORMATION; ONTOLOGY; RECIPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122166
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The Internet has revolutionised the way information is retrieved, and the increase in the number of users has resulted in a surge in the volume and heterogeneity of available data. Recommender systems have become popular tools to help users retrieve relevant information quickly. Food Recommender Systems (FRS), in particular, have proven useful in overcoming the overload of information present in the food domain. However, the recommendation of food is a complex domain with specific characteristics causing many challenges. Additionally, very few systematic literature reviews have been conducted in the domain on FRS. This paper presents a systematic literature review that summarises the current state-of-the-art in FRS. Our systematic review examines the different methods and algorithms used for recommendation, the data and how it is processed, and evaluation methods. It also presents the advantages and disadvantages of FRS. To achieve this, a total of 67 high-quality studies were selected from a pool of 2,738 studies using strict quality criteria. The review reveals that the domain of food recommendation is very diverse, and most FRS are built using content-based filtering and ML approaches to provide non-personalised recommendations. The review provides valuable information to the research field, helping researchers in the domain to select a strategy to develop FRS. This review can help improve the efficiency of development, thus closing the gap between the development of FRS and other recommender systems.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Systematic Literature Review of Food Recommender Systems
    Mahajan P.
    Kaur P.D.
    SN Computer Science, 5 (1)
  • [2] Package recommender systems: A systematic review
    van Schaik, S. N.
    Masthoff, J.
    Wibowo, A. T.
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES-NETHERLANDS, 2019, 13 (04): : 435 - 452
  • [3] Economic recommender systems - a systematic review
    De Biasio, Alvise
    Navarin, Nicolo
    Jannach, Dietmar
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 63
  • [4] Health Recommender Systems: Systematic Review
    De Croon, Robin
    Van Houdt, Leen
    Htun, Nyi Nyi
    Stiglic, Gregor
    Vanden Abeele, Vero
    Verbert, Katrien
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (06)
  • [5] A systematic literature review of multicriteria recommender systems
    Monti, Diego
    Rizzo, Giuseppe
    Morisio, Maurizio
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2021, 54 (01) : 427 - 468
  • [6] A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems
    Deepjyoti Roy
    Mala Dutta
    Journal of Big Data, 9
  • [7] Medical Recommender Systems: a Systematic Literature Review
    Claderon-Blas, Javier A.
    Angelica Cerdan, Maria
    Sanchez-Garcia, Angel J.
    Domingue-Isidro, Saul
    2023 MEXICAN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE, ENC, 2024,
  • [8] A systematic review of learning path recommender systems
    Rahayu, Nur W.
    Ferdiana, Ridi
    Kusumawardani, Sri S.
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 28 (06) : 7437 - 7460
  • [9] A Systematic Mapping Review on MOOC Recommender Systems
    Uddin, Imran
    Imran, Ali Shariq
    Muhammad, Khan
    Fayyaz, Nosheen
    Sajjad, Muhammad
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 118379 - 118405
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Recommender Systems and Their Applications in Cybersecurity
    Pawlicka, Aleksandra
    Pawlicki, Marek
    Kozik, Rafal
    Choras, Ryszard S.
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (15)