Influence of frontal-to-parietal connectivity in pseudoneglect: A cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation study

被引:1
|
作者
Guidali, Giacomo [1 ,4 ]
Bagattini, Chiara [2 ]
De Matola, Matteo [1 ,5 ]
Brignani, Debora [3 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Ist Ctr San Giovanni Dio Fatebenefratelli, Neurophysiol Lab, Brescia, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Sect Neurosurg, Dept Neurosci Biomed & Movement Sci, Verona, Italy
[3] Univ Brescia, Dept Clin & Expt Sci, Brescia, Italy
[4] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Psychol, Piazza Ateneo Nuovo 1, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Trento, Ctr Mind Brain Sci CIMeC, Rovereto, TN, Italy
关键词
Visuospatial bias; ccPAS; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Connectivity; Plasticity; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TIMING-DEPENDENT PLASTICITY; VENTRAL ATTENTION SYSTEMS; CONCURRENT TMS-FMRI; HUMAN VISUAL-CORTEX; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; SPATIAL NEGLECT; VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.012
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Pseudoneglect is a set of visuospatial biases that entails a behavioral advantage for stimuli appearing in the left hemifield compared to the right one. Although right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial processing has been invoked to explain this phenomenon, its neurophysiological mechanisms are still debated, and the role of intra- and interhemispheric connectivity is yet to be defined. The present study explored the possibility of modulating pseudoneglect in healthy participants through a cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation protocol (ccPAS): a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol that manipulates the interplay between brain regions through the repeated, time-locked coupling of two transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses. In the first experiment, healthy participants underwent a frontal-to-parietal (FP) and a parietal-to-frontal (PF) ccPAS. In the FP protocol, the first TMS pulse targeted the right frontal eye field (FEF), and the second pulse the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL), two critical areas for visuospatial and attentional processing. In the PF condition, the order of the pulses was reversed. In both protocols, the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) was 10 ms. Before and after stimulation, pseudoneglect was assessed with a landmark task and a manual line bisection task. A second experiment controlled for ccPAS timing dependency by testing FP-ccPAS with a longer ISI of 100 ms. Results showed that after administering the FP-ccPAS with the ISI of 10 ms, participants' leftward bias in the landmark task increased significantly, with no effects in the manual line bisection task. The other two protocols tested were ineffective. Our findings showed that ccPAS could be used to modulate pseudoneglect by exploiting frontal-to-parietal connectivity, possibly through increased top-down attentional control. FP-ccPAS could represent a promising tool to investigate connectivity properties within visuospatial and attentional networks in the healthy and as a potential rehabilitation protocol in patients suffering from severe visuospatial pathologies. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 64
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cortico-cortical paired-associative stimulation to investigate the plasticity of cortico-cortical visual networks in humans
    Tarasi, Luca
    Turrini, Sonia
    Sel, Alejandra
    Avenanti, Alessio
    Romei, Vincenzo
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2024, 56
  • [2] Cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation: a novel neurostimulation solution for modulating brain connectivity and networks
    Zhang, Jack Jiaqi
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 17
  • [3] Can we manipulate brain connectivity? A systematic review of cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation effects
    Hernandez-Pavon, Julio C.
    San Agustin, Arantzazu
    Wang, Max C.
    Veniero, Domenica
    Pons, Jose L.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 154 : 169 - 193
  • [4] Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation Influences Response Inhibition: Cortico-cortical and Cortico-subcortical Networks
    Kohl, Sina
    Hannah, Ricci
    Rocchi, Lorenzo
    Nord, Camilla L.
    Rothwell, John
    Voon, Valerie
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 85 (04) : 355 - 363
  • [5] Interhemispheric cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation of the prefrontal cortex jointly modulates frontal asymmetry and emotional reactivity
    Zibman, Samuel
    Daniel, Edan
    Alyagon, Uri
    Etkin, Amit
    Zangen, Abraham
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (01) : 139 - 147
  • [6] Gradual enhancement of corticomotor excitability during cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation
    Sonia Turrini
    Francesca Fiori
    Emilio Chiappini
    Emiliano Santarnecchi
    Vincenzo Romei
    Alessio Avenanti
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [7] Paired Associative Stimulation Influences Response Inhibition: Cortico-Cortical and Cortico-Subcortical Networks
    Kohl, Sina
    Ricci, Hannah
    Rocchi, Lorenzo
    Nord, Camilla
    Mandali, Alekhya
    Rothwell, John
    Voon, Valerie
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 83 (09) : S345 - S346
  • [8] Gradual enhancement of corticomotor excitability during cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation
    Turrini, Sonia
    Fiori, Francesca
    Chiappini, Emilio
    Santarnecchi, Emiliano
    Romei, Vincenzo
    Avenanti, Alessio
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [9] Applications of cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation for age-related declines of hand function
    Maclennan, Rob J.
    Renshaw, Doug W.
    Danielson, Tyler L.
    Gruber, Anthony D.
    Harper, Lacey
    Reese, Shawn M.
    Mattern, Kirk
    Winesett, Steven P.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2023, 601 (24): : 5597 - 5599
  • [10] Connectivity of the frontal and anterior insular network: a cortico-cortical evoked potential study
    Enatsu, Rei
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Jorge
    Bulacio, Juan
    Mosher, John C.
    Burgess, Richard C.
    Najm, Imad
    Nair, Dileep R.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 125 (01) : 90 - 101