Blood Donors' Preferences Toward Incentives for Donation in China

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhai, Peicong [4 ]
Jiang, Shan [5 ,6 ]
Li, Chaofan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Shunping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Cheeloo Coll Med, Ctr Hlth Management & Policy Res, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, NHC Key Lab Hlth Econ & Policy Res, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Ctr Hlth Preference Res, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[4] Blood Ctr Shandong Prov, Jinan, Shandong, Peoples R China
[5] Macquarie Univ, Macquarie Business Sch, Macquarie Univ Ctr Hlth Econ, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Macquarie Univ, Australian Inst Hlth Innovat, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH-CARE; ATTITUDES; DECISION;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18320
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Blood donation is critical for health care systems, but donor retention remains challenging. Understanding donors' preferences can inform incentive design and improve retention rates. OBJECTIVE To identify donor preferences for incentive attributes and their relative importance in promoting blood donation among Chinese donors in Shandong. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This survey study fielded a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with a dual response design among blood donors, analyzing the responses under forced and unforced choice settings. The study took place from January 1 to April 30, 2022, in 3 cities (Yantai, Jinan, and Heze) representing diverse socioeconomic strata in Shandong, China. Eligible participants were blood donors aged 18 to 60 years who had donated within the preceding 12 months. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Data were analyzed from May to June 2022. EXPOSURE Respondents were presented with different blood donation incentive profiles, varying in health examination, blood recipient, honor recognition, travel time, and gift value. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE Respondent preferences for nonmonetary incentive attributes, attribute relative importance, willingness-to-discard values for attribute improvement, and estimated uptake of new incentive profiles. RESULTS A total of 650 donors were invited, of which 477 were included for analysis. The respondents were predominately male (308 respondents [64.6%]), aged 18 to 34 years (291 respondents [61.0%]), and had undergraduate degrees or higher (286 respondents [59.9%]). Among the 477 valid respondents, the mean (SD) age was 31.9 (11.2) years. Respondents preferred comprehensive health examination, family members as recipients, central government recognition, 30-minute travel time, and a gift valued at 60 Renminbi (RMB). No significant differences were found between the model results of forced and unforced choice setting. Blood recipient was the most important attribute, followed by health examination and gifts, and then honor and travel time. Respondents were willing to discard RMB 32 (95% CI, 18-46) for an improved health examination and RMB 69 (95% CI, 47-92) for changing the recipient from themselves to family members. Scenario analysis estimated 80.3% (SE, 0.024) of donors would endorse the new incentive profile if the recipient was changed from themselves to family members. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this survey study, blood recipient, health examination, and gift value were perceived more important as nonmonetary incentives than travel time and honor recognition. Tailoring incentives according to these preferences may improve donor retention. Further research could help refine and optimize incentive schemes for blood donation promotion.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Blood Donors' Preferences Toward Incentives for Donation in China (vol 6, e2318320, 2023)
    Wang, Y.
    Zhai, P.
    Jiang, S.
    Li, C.
    Li, S.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (02)
  • [2] Blood donors' preferences for blood donation for biomedical research
    Raivola, Vera
    Snell, Karoliina
    Pastila, Satu
    Helen, Ilpo
    Partanen, Jukka
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2018, 58 (07) : 1640 - 1646
  • [3] Thank you for donating: a survey of Australian donors' and nondonors' orientations toward noncash incentives for blood donation
    Van Dyke, Nina
    Chell, Kathleen
    Masser, Barbara
    Kruse, Sarah P.
    Gemelli, Carley N.
    Jensen, Kyle
    Davison, Tanya E.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2020, 60 (07) : 1454 - 1462
  • [4] Voluntary blood donation preferences in China: A discrete choice experiment among experienced and inexperienced donors
    Cao, Chuqing
    Wang, Jing
    Guo, Tianyu
    Hu, Xinwen
    Li, Bo
    Wu, Caixia
    Liu, Zhong
    Pan, Stephen W.
    [J]. VOX SANGUINIS, 2024, 119 (05) : 428 - 438
  • [5] The Value of Incentives in Blood Donation
    Berger, Mitchell
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6142) : 128 - 129
  • [6] Blood donation incentives: Attitudes and risk relationships among first time and repeat whole blood donors
    Williams, AE
    Glynn, SA
    Bethel, J
    Ameti, DI
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2000, 40 (10) : 1S - 2S
  • [7] Blood donors' preferences for blood donation for biomedical research (vol 58, pg 1640, 2018)
    Raivola, V
    Snell, K.
    Pastila, S.
    Helen, I
    Partanen, J.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2020, 60 (11) : 2771 - 2771
  • [8] Attitudes toward blood donation incentives in the United States: implications for donor recruitment
    Glynn, SA
    Williams, AE
    Nass, CC
    Bethel, J
    Kessler, D
    Scott, EP
    Fridey, J
    Kleinman, SH
    Schreiber, GB
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2003, 43 (01) : 7 - 16
  • [9] ATTITUDES TOWARD SOLID-ORGAN DONATION - BLOOD-DONORS VS NONBLOOD DONORS
    SZUFLAD, P
    DESANTIS, D
    DZIK, W
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 1993, 33 (09) : S93 - S93
  • [10] Incentives for Blood Donation - an Important Topic
    von Auer, Friedger
    [J]. TRANSFUSION MEDICINE AND HEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 36 (05) : 299 - 300