Size rather than complexity of sexual ornaments prolongs male metamorphosis and explains sexual size dimorphism in sepsid flies

被引:1
|
作者
Rajaratnam, Gowri [1 ]
Lui, Gerald [1 ]
Su, Kathy F. Y. [1 ]
Chew, Martin S. J. [1 ]
Ang, Yuchen [1 ]
Puniamoorthy, Nalini [1 ,2 ]
Rohner, Patrick T. [2 ,3 ]
Blanckenhorn, Wolf U. [2 ]
Meier, Rudolf [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Biol Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Univ Zurich Irchel, Dept Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies, Winterthurerstr 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN USA
[4] Humboldt Univ, Leibniz Inst Evolut & Biodivers Sci, Ctr Integrat Biodivers Discovery, Museum Naturkunde, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
metamorphosis; sexual ornaments; development time; sexual dimorphism; growth; secondary sexual trait complexity; COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS REVEALS; FEMALE RESISTANCE BEHAVIOR; YELLOW DUNG FLY; BODY-SIZE; STATIC ALLOMETRY; DIPTERA; SELECTION; EVOLUTION; MATE; PLASTICITY;
D O I
10.1098/rspb.2022.2531
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Male sexual ornaments often evolve rapidly and are thought to be costly, thus contributing to sexual size dimorphism. However, little is known about their developmental costs, and even less about costs associated with structural complexity. Here, we quantified the size and complexity of three morphologically elaborate sexually dimorphic male ornaments that starkly differ across sepsid fly species (Diptera: Sepsidae): (i) male forelegs range from being unmodified, like in most females, to being adorned with spines and large cuticular protrusions; (ii) the fourth abdominal sternites are either unmodified or are converted into complex de novo appendages; and (iii) male genital claspers range from small and simple to large and complex (e.g. bifurcated). We tracked the development of 18 sepsid species from egg to adult to determine larval feeding and pupal metamorphosis times of both sexes. We then statistically explored whether pupal and adult body size, ornament size and/or ornament complexity are correlated with sex-specific development times. Larval growth and foraging periods of male and female larvae did not differ, but the time spent in the pupal stage was ca 5% longer for sepsid males despite emerging 9% smaller than females on average. Surprisingly, we found no evidence that sexual trait complexity prolongs pupal development beyond some effects of trait size. Evolving more complex traits thus does not incur developmental costs at least in this system.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sexual size dimorphism is associated with reproductive life history trait differentiation in coexisting sepsid flies
    Blanckenhorn, Wolf U.
    Baur, Julian
    Busso, Juan Pablo
    Giesen, Athene
    Gourgoulianni, Natalia
    van Koppenhagen, Nicola
    Roy, Jeannine
    Schaefer, Martin A.
    Wegmann, Alexandra
    Rohner, Patrick T.
    OIKOS, 2020, 129 (08) : 1152 - 1162
  • [2] Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of allometry for sexual size dimorphism
    Dale, James
    Dunn, Peter O.
    Figuerola, Jordi
    Lislevand, Terje
    Szekely, Tamas
    Whittingham, Linda A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 274 (1628) : 2971 - 2979
  • [3] SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND MALE COMBAT IN SNAKES
    SHINE, R
    OECOLOGIA, 1978, 33 (03) : 269 - 277
  • [4] Hidden complexity in the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in male-larger beetles
    Tomáš Vendl
    Petr Šípek
    Ondřej Kouklík
    Lukáš Kratochvíl
    Scientific Reports, 8
  • [5] Hidden complexity in the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in male-larger beetles
    Vendl, Tomas
    Sipek, Petr
    Kouklik, Ondrej
    Kratochvil, Lukas
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2018, 8
  • [6] Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds
    Székely, T
    Freckleton, RP
    Reynolds, JD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2004, 101 (33) : 12224 - 12227
  • [7] Sexual selection on male size drives the evolution of male-biased sexual size dimorphism via the prolongation of male development
    Rohner, Patrick T.
    Blanckenhorn, Wolf U.
    Puniamoorthy, Nalini
    EVOLUTION, 2016, 70 (06) : 1189 - 1199
  • [8] The influence of sexual selection and male agility on sexual size dimorphism in bustards (Otididae)
    Raihani, G
    Székely, T
    Serrano-Meneses, MA
    Pitra, C
    Goriup, P
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 71 : 833 - 838
  • [9] The effect of sexual size dimorphism on mating behaviour in two dung flies with contrasting dimorphism
    Ding, A
    Blanckenhorn, WU
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2002, 4 (02) : 259 - 273
  • [10] REVERSED SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN TENGMALM OWL - IS SMALL MALE SIZE ADAPTIVE
    HAKKARAINEN, H
    KORPIMAKI, E
    OIKOS, 1991, 61 (03) : 337 - 346