Fully coupled two-phase hydro-mechanical model for wellbore stability analysis in tight gas formations considering the variation of rock mechanical parameters

被引:6
|
作者
Liu, Jinhua [1 ]
Ma, Tianshou [1 ]
Fu, Jianhong [1 ]
Peng, Nian [2 ]
Qiu, Yi [1 ]
Liu, Yang [3 ]
Gao, Jiajia [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Petr Univ, State Key Lab Oil & Gas Reservoir Geol & Exploitat, Chengdu 610500, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Petr & Nat Gas Engn, Chongqing 401331, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Petr Univ, Key Lab Oil & Gas Equipment, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610500, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Tight sandstone gas; Wellbore stability; Hydro-mechanical coupling; Two-phase seepage; Rock mechanics; PORE STRUCTURE CHARACTERIZATION; INCLINED BOREHOLE; MULTIPHASE FLOW; POROUS-MEDIA; FORMULATION; EQUATIONS; PRESSURE; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.205023
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Tight gas reservoirs are typically characterized by the unsaturated case that contains both water and gas fluids. However, previous wellbore stability analysis usually assumes that the porous rock is only saturated with a single fluid, thereby failing to describe the two-phase seepage behavior and the change in water content on the me-chanical properties of the unsaturated rock, resulting in inaccurate mud weight predictions from wellbore sta-bility analysis. Therefore, this paper aims to propose a fully coupled two-phase hydro-mechanical model that is available to obtain the change in water saturation and incorporates the variation of rock mechanical parameters with water saturation into the coupling relationship to assess the wellbore stability. By comparing five models representing the saturated and various unsaturated conditions, the influences of two-phase seepage and rock mechanical parameters on the evolution of pore pressure, stresses and wellbore stability are clarified. Finally, the influences of wellbore pressure, initial water saturation, porosity, and permeability on wellbore stability are discussed. The results show that the unsaturated pore pressure is influenced not only by the compressibility and viscosity of the fluid, but also by the saturation level and wellbore pressure. The difference in effective stresses is explained by the difference in poroelastic effect between saturated and unsaturated conditions. The decrease in elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio affects the effective tangential stress, while the increase in Biot's coefficient affects the effective radial stress. The prediction result of the present model that considers the combined effects of the two-phase hydro-mechanical coupling and the variation of all five mechanical parameters with water content is more consistent with the real borehole diameter curve. In the field case of the presented tight gas reservoir, the excessive overbalanced pressure is detrimental to wellbore stability, even worse than the underbalanced pres-sure. A near-balanced pressure may be the most beneficial for maintaining wellbore stability and protecting tight gas reservoirs. The higher risk of wellbore instability may correspond to formations with relatively high permeability, high porosity and high gas saturation.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Effect of depressurization decomposition of combustible ice on wellbore stability considering gas-water two-phase hydro-mechanical coupling
    Zhang Y.
    Li J.
    Chang Y.
    Li H.
    Li D.
    Zhongguo Shiyou Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2023, 47 (01): : 148 - 155
  • [2] Fully Coupled Thermo-hydro-mechanical Model for Wellbore Stability Analysis in Deep Gas-Bearing Unsaturated Formations Based on Thermodynamics
    Ma, Tianshou
    Liu, Jinhua
    Fu, Jianhong
    Qiu, Yi
    Fan, Xiangyu
    Martyushev, Dmitriy A.
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2024, 58 (1) : 33 - 64
  • [3] Experimental investigation of the hydro-mechanical behavior of tight gas formation sandstone and its impacts on the wellbore stability
    Hou, Z.
    Somerville, J.
    Hutcheon, R.
    EUROCK 2005: IMPACT OF HUMAN ACTIVITY ON THE GEOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT, 2005, : 205 - 211
  • [4] Rock Cavern Stability Analysis Under Different Hydro-Geological Conditions Using the Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Model
    Chen, H. M.
    Zhao, Z. Y.
    Choo, L. Q.
    Sun, J. P.
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2016, 49 (02) : 555 - 572
  • [5] Rock Cavern Stability Analysis Under Different Hydro-Geological Conditions Using the Coupled Hydro-Mechanical Model
    H. M. Chen
    Z. Y. Zhao
    L. Q. Choo
    J. P. Sun
    Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49 : 555 - 572
  • [6] On the use of different data assimilation schemes in a fully coupled hydro-mechanical slope stability analysis
    Mohsan, Muhammad
    Vossepoel, Femke C.
    Vardon, Philip J.
    GEORISK-ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF RISK FOR ENGINEERED SYSTEMS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2024, 18 (01) : 121 - 137
  • [7] Coupled hydro-mechanical model for fractured rock masses using the discontinuous deformation analysis
    Chen, Huimei
    Zhao, Zhiye
    Sun, Jianping
    TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 38 : 506 - 516
  • [8] Simulating two-phase flow and geomechanical deformation in fractured karst reservoirs based on a coupled hydro-mechanical model
    Liu, Lijun
    Huang, Zhaoqin
    Yao, Jun
    Lei, Qinghua
    Di, Yuan
    Wu, Yu-Shu
    Zhang, Kai
    Cui, Shiti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES, 2021, 137
  • [9] Fully coupled hydro-mechanical modeling of two-phase flow in deformable fractured porous media with discontinuous and continuous Galerkin method
    Ma, Tianran
    Jiang, Lintong
    Shen, Weijun
    Cao, Wenzhuo
    Guo, Chaobin
    Nick, Hamidreza M.
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2023, 164
  • [10] Finite element implementation of a fully coupled hydro-mechanical model and unsaturated soil analysis under hydraulic and mechanical loads
    Zhang, Yue
    Zhou, Annan
    Nazem, Majidreza
    Carter, John
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2019, 110 : 222 - 241