Environmental sustainability and cost performances of construction and demolition waste management scenarios: A case study of timber and concrete houses in Thailand

被引:3
|
作者
Tanthanawiwat, Kittipat [1 ,2 ]
Gheewala, Shabbir H. [1 ,2 ]
Nilsalab, Pariyapat [1 ,2 ]
Schoch, Martin [3 ]
Silalertruksa, Thapat [4 ]
机构
[1] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Joint Grad Sch Energy & Environm JGSEE, 126 Prachauthit Rd, Bangkok 10140, Thailand
[2] Minist Higher Educ Sci Res & Innovat, Ctr Excellence Energy Technol & Environm, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] King Mongkuts Univ Technol Thonburi, Sch Architecture & Design, Thonburi, Thailand
[4] King Mongkuts Univ Technol, Fac Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Thonburi, Thailand
关键词
Life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; Circular economy; Construction and demolition waste; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GENERATION; WOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140652
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Circular economy (CE) is becoming a vital strategy to tackle two major environmental challenges of building and construction sector, viz., intensive resource consumption and massive construction and demolition waste (CDW) generation. The study assessed six circular economy scenarios for CDW management of concrete and timber houses in Thailand compared to the base case (landfill). Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing were conducted to illustrate the influence of CE strategies on environmental sustainability and cost performance. Material Circularity Indicator (MCI) was evaluated to determine the circularity performances of material use for the CE scenarios. The 100% recycling scenario resulted in 124% and 166-169% reductions of the mineral resource scarcity impact as compared to the conventional CDW management for the concrete and timber houses, respectively. For the concrete house, 100% recycling scenario resulted in the lowest life cycle costs (when combining both internal cost and externalities). On the other hand, the 100% recycling scenario of timber house would bring about the highest cost due to the energy cost. However, for the timber house, energy recovery scenario provided the lowest impact values on global warming, ozone formation, and terrestrial acidification. The internal costs of implementing the CE measures are higher for timber than for concrete. The MCI value for 100% recycling scenario was about 0.55; however, it can be increased to 0.73 (timber house) and 0.75 (concrete house) if the utility lifetime of building materials were extended. The results show the integrating the CE for CDW management can bring benefit to both environmental sustainability and cost performance.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of construction and demolition waste management on environmental sustainability in Lunahuana: A correlational study
    Yactayo-Ormeno, Mirna
    Nanez-Silva, Miriam
    Cuba-Carbajal, Nestor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 10 (09): : 1 - 7
  • [2] Sustainability assessment of Construction and Demolition Waste management applied to an Italian case
    Iodice, Silvia
    Garbarino, Elena
    Cerreta, Maria
    Tonini, Davide
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 128 : 83 - 98
  • [3] Construction and Demolition Waste Management: A Case Study on Romania
    Dragan, Gabriela
    Marinoiu, Ana Maria
    Voicu-Dorobantu, Roxana
    ENERGY PROBLEMS AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2009, : 482 - +
  • [4] Construction and Demolition Waste Management (Tehran Case Study)
    Broujeni, Babak Rouhi
    Omrani, Ghassem Ali
    Naghavi, Reza
    Afraseyabi, Salar S.
    ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2016, 6 (06) : 1249 - 1252
  • [5] Comparison of scenarios for the integrated management of construction and demolition waste by life cycle assessment: A case study in Brazil
    Giordano Penteado, Carmenlucia Santos
    Rosado, Lais Peixoto
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (10) : 1026 - 1035
  • [6] Cost analysis of Construction and Demolition waste management: Case study of the Pearl River Delta of China
    Liu, J. (ljkgowell@163.com), 1600, Bentham Science Publishers B.V., P.O. Box 294, Bussum, 1400 AG, Netherlands (07):
  • [7] Modelling and Optimizing Resource Management and Environmental Benefit of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Case Study in China
    Sun, Honghao
    Liu, Hongmei
    Tian, Junjie
    Guo, Rong
    Xu, Qian
    Yao, Lu
    Hong, Weimin
    Li, Haiyan
    Zhu, Chenhui
    BUILDINGS, 2022, 12 (09)
  • [8] Evaluating sustainability in waste management: the case of construction and demolition, chemical and clinical wastes in Hong Kong
    Chung, SS
    Lo, CWH
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2003, 37 (02) : 119 - 145
  • [9] An experimental study on concrete block using construction demolition waste and life cycle cost analysis
    Abraham, J. Jolly
    Saravanakumar, R.
    Ebenanjar, P. Evanzalin
    Elango, K. S.
    Vivek, D.
    Anandaraj, S.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 60 : 1320 - 1324
  • [10] The contribution of environmental management systems to the management of construction and demolition waste:: The case of Autonomous Community of Madrid (Spain)
    Rodriguez, Gracia
    Alegre, Francisco Javier
    Martinez, German
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2007, 50 (03) : 334 - 349