A new model for compressor surge and stall control

This paper compares the bifurcations and closed-loop performances of two compressor models, Moore-Greitzer (MG) and a developed model based on MG (Shahriyari Khaleghi, SK). First, both models are linearized about two equilibrium points (pure surge and fully-developed rotating stall), and the perturbed state-space dynamics and input matrices are obtained. The compressor unstable regions are then identified using an eigenvalue and global bifurcation analysis. Furthermore, optimal LQR controllers are designed, and the performances of closed-loop systems are compared. The LQRs are designed to control the compression system near the peak pressure rise by suppressing surge or stall. Results reveal that if the initial operating point is in the positive slope region of the compressor characteristic and the initial amplitude of the disturbances is small, the LQR controller can stabilize the compressor in both models. However, when the disturbances are intensive, the two models respond differently: although the SK model damps a fair range of disturbances and predicts instability for excessively powerful disturbances, the MG model always damps them, even when extremely intense. Without a controller in the MG model, initial disturbances (even very large) can never grow and are always damped in the compressor's negative slope region (obviously, the same applies to the controller). However, pending the amplitude of the disturbances (in the absence of a controller), the disturbances in the SK model may be damped or grow. The SK model can successfully control the instabilities if the disturbances are small. Nonetheless, the controller fails to dampen the instabilities for extreme disturbances, which is consistent with reality.