Pain Assessment Using the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Kim, Min Kyoung [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Geun Joo [1 ,3 ]
Oh, Kyung Seo [1 ]
Lee, Sang Phil [4 ]
Kang, Hyun [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul 06974, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Gwangmyeong Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Gwangmyeong Si 14353, South Korea
[3] Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul 06973, South Korea
[4] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Biomed Engn, Cheongju 28644, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
analgesia; nociception; analgesia nociception index; analgesics; opioid; monitoring; intra-operative; RECEIVING SCALP BLOCK; SURGICAL PLETH INDEX; ANALGESIA/NOCICEPTION INDEX; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; INTRAOPERATIVE ANALGESIA; MONITORING NOCICEPTION; HEMODYNAMIC REACTIVITY; SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA; SITE INFILTRATION; DIAGNOSTIC-TEST;
D O I
10.3390/jpm13101461
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The analgesia nociception index (ANI) has emerged as a potential measurement for objective pain assessment during general anesthesia. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI in assessing intra- and post-operative pain in patients undergoing general anesthesia. We conducted a comprehensive search of Ovid-MEDLINE, Ovid-EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, public clinical trial databases (ClinicalTrials and Clinical Research Information Service), and OpenSIGLE to identify relevant studies published prior to May 2023 and included studies that evaluated the accuracy and effectiveness of ANI for intra- or post-operative pain assessment during general anesthesia. Among the 962 studies identified, 30 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis. For predicting intra-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under curve of ANI were 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79-0.83; I2 = 68.2%), 0.93 (95% CI = 0.92-0.93; I2 = 99.8%), 2.32 (95% CI = 1.33-3.30; I2 = 61.7%), and 0.77 (95% CI = 0.76-0.78; I2 = 87.4%), respectively. ANI values and changes in intra-operative hemodynamic variables showed statistically significant correlations. For predicting post-operative pain, pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of ANI were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.87-0.93; I2 = 58.7%), 0.51 (95% CI = 0.49-0.52; I2 = 99.9%), and 3.38 (95% CI = 2.87-3.88; I2 = 81.2%), respectively. ANI monitoring in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia is a valuable measurement for predicting intra- and post-operative pain. It reduces the use of intra-operative opioids and aids in pain management throughout the perioperative period.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review
    T. Shiva Shahiri
    Philippe Richebé
    Melissa Richard-Lalonde
    Céline Gélinas
    [J]. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2022, 36 : 623 - 635
  • [2] Description of the validity of the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and Nociception Level Index (NOL) for nociception assessment in anesthetized patients undergoing surgery: a systematized review
    Shahiri, T. Shiva
    Richebe, Philippe
    Richard-Lalonde, Melissa
    Gelinas, Celine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2022, 36 (03) : 623 - 635
  • [3] Comparison between Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and self-reported measures for diagnosing pain in conscious individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Daniela Abrão Baroni
    Lucas Guimarães Abreu
    Saul Martins Paiva
    Luciane Rezende Costa
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 12
  • [4] Comparison between Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) and self-reported measures for diagnosing pain in conscious individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Baroni, Daniela Abrao
    Abreu, Lucas Guimaraes
    Paiva, Saul Martins
    Costa, Luciane Rezende
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [5] Usefulness of Analgesia Nociception Index for guiding intraoperative opioid administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Chang, Po-Chih
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Lan, Kuo-Mao
    Liao, Shu-Wei
    Lin, Yao-Tsung
    Huang, Ping-Wen
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    [J]. MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (01) : 74 - 84
  • [6] Individualized PEEP guided by EIT in patients undergoing general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Lingyan
    Deng, Yanjun
    Xu, Fuqi
    Qiao, Shigang
    Wang, Chen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2024, 94
  • [7] Incidence of malignant hyperthermia in patients undergoing general anesthesia Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    In, Junyong
    Ahn, Eun Jin
    Lee, Dong Kyu
    Kang, Hyun
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (49)
  • [8] The Use of the Perfusion Index to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Liao, Shu-Wei
    Kao, Chia-Li
    Huang, Yen-Ta
    Wu, Jheng-Yan
    Lin, Yao-Tsung
    Lin, Chien-Ming
    Lin, Chien-Hung
    Chen, I-Wen
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (16)
  • [9] Dexmedetomidine effect on delirium in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Youran
    Bu, Xinyi
    Zhao, Na
    Wang, Shuxia
    Wang, Xiaoliang
    Ge, Yali
    Yi, Honggang
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (48)
  • [10] Effectiveness Assessment of Bispectral Index Monitoring Compared with Conventional Monitoring in General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gu, Yichun
    Hao, Jiajun
    Wang, Jiangna
    Liang, Peng
    Peng, Xinyi
    Qin, Xiaoxiao
    Zhang, Yunwei
    He, Da
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2024, 2024