Environmental impact of milk and electricity production from dairy farms with biogas plants of different size and feeding system

被引:2
|
作者
Fusi, Mara [1 ]
Pirlo, Giacomo [1 ]
机构
[1] Council Agr Res & Econ, Res Ctr Anim Prod & Aquaculture, CREA, Via Antonio Lombardo 11, I-26900 Lodi, Italy
关键词
Life cycle assessment; System expansion; Milk; Electricity; Anaerobic digestion; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENERGY CROPS; EFFICIENCY; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135445
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion is an effective method to decrease the environmental impact of milk production and to generate renewable energy. A dairy farm with an annexed biogas plant produces three outputs, milk, meat and electricity, and should be considered as a single system for the evaluation of the environmental impact. The aim of this study was to investigate to what extent the size and feeding methods of the biogas plants in three dairy farms with different features affect the environmental impact related to the milk and electricity produced. The first farm was characterized by a biogas plant of 300 kW fed only with cattle manure, the second farm had a plant of 526 kW fed with cattle manure, maize silage and waste of maize grain production, while the third farm had a biogas plant of 999 kW fed with cattle and poultry manure, maize and triticale silage, and fats from slaugh-terhouse waste. The Life Cycle Assessment involved the environmental impact of Fat Protein Corrected Milk (FPCM), in the first instance with meat and electricity from biogas considered with an economic allocation, and then considered a credit. Successively, the environmental consequences of electricity were evaluated considering milk and meat as credits. With the economic allocation, Carbon Footprint (CFP) of one kg of FPCM was 0.82, 0.85 and 0.72 kg CO2 eq in the first, second and third farm, respectively. In all the three farms, electricity generation from biogas determined a reduction in the environmental impact of milk production thanks to a credit of emissions provided by the production of renewable energy. Milk CFP in the three farms was 0.82, 0.91 and 0.13 kg CO2 eq respectively, with mitigation from biogas of 11%, 11% and 85%. The best performances were obtained in the third farm thanks to higher levels of electricity generation, covered digestate storage and the large use of agri-industrial waste. Electricity CFP in the farms was-0.74,-0.68 and-0.06 kg CO2 eq/kWh respectively. Environmental consequences of electricity production from biogas plants were compensated in all the farms thanks to the credits provided by milk; this compensation was as greater as the ratio between milk and electricity production and the first farm reached better outcomes. In the context of reducing the environmental impact of animal foods and implementing an ecological transition to reach national and European goals for renewable energy production, the work could be beneficial to assess which combination between dairy and energy products should be promoted.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Providing Electricity Requirements by Biogas Production and Its Environmental Benefit in Sample Dairy Farms of Iran
    Sefeedpari, Paria
    Rafiee, Shahin
    Akram, Asadollah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE ENERGY RESEARCH, 2012, 2 (03): : 384 - 387
  • [2] Environmental impact of the biogas production from dairy cows
    Thiangchanta, Surasit
    Khiewwijit, Rungnapha
    Mona, Yuttana
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 290 - 295
  • [3] Biogas production in United States dairy farms incentivized by electricity policy changes
    Evan D. Erickson
    Philip A. Tominac
    Victor M. Zavala
    Nature Sustainability, 2023, 6 : 438 - 446
  • [4] Biogas production in United States dairy farms incentivized by electricity policy changes
    Erickson, Evan D. D.
    Tominac, Philip A. A.
    Zavala, Victor M. M.
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 6 (04) : 438 - 446
  • [5] Factors influencing the carbon footprint of milk production on dairy farms with different feeding strategies in western Europe
    Sorley, Marion
    Casey, Imelda
    Styles, David
    Merino, Pilar
    Trindade, Henrique
    Mulholland, Martin
    Zafra, Cesar Resch
    Keatinge, Ray
    Le Gallj, Andre
    O'Brien, Donal
    Humphreys, James
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 435
  • [6] The impact of modern technology on the welfare and milk production in dairy farms
    Gavrila, Madalin Ilie
    Marginean, Gheorghe Emil
    Vidu, Livia
    Stanciu, Nicolae
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 208 : S43 - +
  • [7] Quality of raw milk from different dairy farms
    Avramescu, Daniela
    Petroman, Ioan
    Avram, Eugeniu
    Petroman, Cornelia
    Balan, Ioana
    Iosim, Iasmina
    Orboi, Manuela Dora
    Marin, Diana
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AGRICULTURE & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 11 (02): : 267 - 269
  • [8] Milk composition and flavor under different feeding systems: A survey of dairy farms
    Yayota, M.
    Tsukamoto, M.
    Yamada, Y.
    Ohtani, S.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2013, 96 (08) : 5174 - 5183
  • [9] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION FROM BIOGAS IN PALESTINE
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Baboun, Samer H.
    Demery, Falah
    Aburdeineh, Iyad
    Fiala, Marco
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 15 (09): : 1915 - 1922
  • [10] Environmental impact of milk production from samples of organic and conventional farms in Lombardy (Italy)
    Pirlo, G.
    Lolli, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 211 : 962 - 971