Innovation driver and county air pollution: cost-benefit analysis perspective

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Rongbo [1 ]
Zhong, Changbiao [2 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Technol, Business Sch, Qingdao 266520, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ, Sch Econ, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
关键词
Innovation driver; County innovation; Air pollution; Mechanism path; Cost and benefit analysis; RENEWABLE ENERGY; TRADE OPENNESS; GOVERNANCE; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; CO2;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-31756-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Innovation is the first power to drive the county's green and low-carbon. It is crucial to explore the impact of innovation on air pollution from the perspective of counties at the bottom of the administrative division hierarchy. The article is aimed at exploring the direct impact effects, spatial spillover effects, impact mechanism pathways, non-linear relationships, and cost-benefits of innovation drive on air pollution in counties. To this end, based on the collection of county-level data from 2007 to 2020 in mainland China, the article constructs a fixed-effects model, a dynamic panel model, and a spatial Durbin model for analysis. For every 1% increase in the quantity of innovation, the county SO2 emission concentration decreases by 0.2% on average; for every 1% increase in the quality of innovation, the county SO2 emission concentration decreases by 0.3% on average. When the county innovation quantity driver increases by one standard deviation, the county SO2 concentration decreases by an average of 0.29%; when the county innovation quality driver each standard deviation increases, the county SO2 concentration is reduced by 0.33% on average. The significant entry of high-end factors, the increased frequency of regulation by the environmental protection department, and the increasing efficiency of energy use are the important mechanism pathways for innovation-driven reduction of air pollution in counties. There is no significant "(inverted) U-shaped" relationship between innovation-driven air pollution in the county samples. There is a negative spatial spillover effect of the innovation quality drive on air pollution control in all Chinese county samples. Innovation to drive the declining size of the county's sulfur dioxide can bring about one billion yuan (about 139.81 million U.S. dollars) in comprehensive economic benefits. In the coming period, county governments should build a new pattern of "blue sky and white clouds" with neighboring regions in terms of spatial agglomeration of high-end elements, green transformation and utilization of energy, and intelligent monitoring and supervision of pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:10621 / 10634
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Innovation driver and county air pollution: cost-benefit analysis perspective
    Rongbo Zhang
    Changbiao Zhong
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 10621 - 10634
  • [2] Interventions to mitigate indoor air pollution: A cost-benefit analysis
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Cameron, Michael P.
    Hassan, Gazi
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (09):
  • [3] Improving air pollution control policy in China-A perspective based on cost-benefit analysis
    Gao, Jinglei
    Yuan, Zengwei
    Liu, Xuewei
    Xia, Xiaoming
    Huang, Xianjin
    Dong, Zhanfeng
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 543 : 307 - 314
  • [4] Cost-benefit analysis: A normative perspective
    Buss, TF
    Yancer, LC
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT QUARTERLY, 1999, 13 (01) : 29 - 37
  • [5] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN PERSPECTIVE - REPLY
    FORDHAM, RC
    POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 1971, 42 (01): : 94 - 95
  • [6] Cost-benefit analysis of China's national air pollution control plan
    Zhang, Jing
    Jiang, Hongqiang
    Zhang, Wei
    Ma, Guoxia
    Wang, Yanchao
    Lu, Yaling
    Hu, Xi
    Zhou, Jia
    Peng, Fei
    Bi, Jun
    Wang, Jinnan
    FRONTIERS OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2019, 6 (04) : 524 - 537
  • [7] Interventions for mitigating indoor-air pollution in Nigeria: a cost-benefit analysis
    Isihak, Salisu
    Akpan, Uduak
    Adeleye, Monsuru
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2012, 6 (03) : 417 - 429
  • [8] Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefit analysis
    Bollen, Johannes
    van der Zwaan, Bob
    Brink, Corjan
    Eerens, Hans
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2009, 31 (03) : 161 - 181
  • [9] Cost-benefit analysis of China’s Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control
    Jing Zhang
    Hongqiang Jiang
    Wei Zhang
    Guoxia Ma
    Yanchao Wang
    Yaling Lu
    Xi Hu
    Jia Zhou
    Fei Peng
    Jun Bi
    Jinnan Wang
    Frontiers of Engineering Management, 2019, 6 : 524 - 537
  • [10] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Class Actions: An Israeli Perspective
    Klement, Alon
    Weinshall-Margel, Keren
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2016, 172 (01): : 75 - 103