Hyperprogressive Disease (HPD) in Solid Tumours Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Real-World Setting

被引:0
|
作者
Kanjanapan, Yada [1 ,2 ]
Guduguntla, Geetha [3 ]
Varikara, Ashwati Krishnan [4 ]
Szajer, Jeremy [3 ]
Yip, Desmond [1 ,2 ]
Cockburn, John [2 ,3 ]
Fadia, Mitali [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Canberra Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Canberra, ACT 2606, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, ANU Med Sch, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[3] Canberra Hosp, Dept Med Imaging, Canberra, Australia
[4] Canberra Hosp, Dept Pathol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
关键词
hyperprogressive disease; hyperprogression; immunotherapy; checkpoint inhibitor; PD-1; PD-L1; tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; CANCER; IMMUNOTHERAPY; GUIDELINES; BLOCKADE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1177/15330338231209129
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a state of accelerated tumor growth from cancer immunotherapy, associated with poor outcome. The reported incidence is 6% to 29% among studies using varying definitions of HPD, with no predictive biomarkers. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic and predictive for immunotherapy benefit in various tumor types, but have only been tested for correlation with HPD in one study. Objectives: The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of HPD in solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a real-world setting, and to assess clinicopathological features as potential biomarkers for HPD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at a single institution. Imaging pre-immunotherapy and postimmunotherapy were assessed for HPD, and correlated against clinicopathological factors, including TILs and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status through archival tumor assessment. HPD was defined per Matos et al as response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) progressive disease, minimum increase in measurable lesions of 10 mm, plus increase of >= 40% in sum of target lesions compared with baseline and/or increase of >= 20% in sum of target lesions compared with baseline plus new lesions in at least 2 different organs. Results: HPD occurred in 11 of 87 patients (13%), and associated with inferior overall survival (median 5.5 months vs 18.3 months, P = .002). However, on multivariate analysis, only liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 4.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.27-9.56, P < .001) and PD-L1 status (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.95, P = .03) were significantly associated with survival. Presence of liver metastases correlated with occurence of HPD (P = .01). Age, sex, and monotherapy versus combination immunotherapy were not predictive for HPD. PD-L1 status and TILs were not associated with HPD. Conclusions: We found 13% HPD among solid tumor patients treated with immunotherapy, consistent with the range reported in prior series. Assessment for HPD is feasible outside of a clinical trials setting, using modified criteria that require comparison of 2 imaging studies. Liver metastases were associated with risk of HPD, while TILs and PD-L1 status were not predictive for HPD.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hyperprogressive Disease (HPD) in Solid Tumours Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Real-World Setting
    Kanjanapan, Yada
    Guduguntla, Geetha
    Varikara, Ashwati Krishnan
    Szajer, Jeremy
    Yip, Desmond
    Cockburn, John
    Fadia, Mitali
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2023, 22
  • [2] Hyperprogressive disease in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Zhang, Haochen
    Fang, Xuefeng
    Li, Dan
    Yang, Mengyuan
    Yu, Linzhen
    Ding, Yuwei
    Shen, Hong
    Yuan, Ying
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2021, 45 (03)
  • [4] Investigation on potential biomarkers of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
    J. Liu
    Q. Wu
    S. Wu
    X. Xie
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2021, 23 : 1782 - 1793
  • [5] Investigation on potential biomarkers of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) triggered by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
    Liu, J.
    Wu, Q.
    Wu, S.
    Xie, X.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (09): : 1782 - 1793
  • [6] Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Real-world Setting in Japan
    Manako, Tomomi
    Yasumatsu, Ryuji
    Nakano, Takafumi
    Matsuo, Mioko
    Takeuchi, Toranishin
    Taura, Masahiko
    Tamae, Akihiro
    Yamauchi, Moriyasu
    Masuda, Muneyuki
    Taguchi, Kenichi
    Nakagawa, Takashi
    IN VIVO, 2023, 37 (02): : 747 - 755
  • [7] A real-world data of Immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India
    Noronha, Vanita
    Abraham, George
    Patil, Vijay
    Joshi, Amit
    Menon, Nandini
    Mahajan, Abhishek
    Janu, Amit
    Jain, Srushti
    Talreja, Vikas T.
    Kapoor, Akhil
    Singh, Gunjesh Kumar
    Khaddar, Satvik
    Gupta, Kushal
    Rathinasamy, Narmadha
    Srinivas, Sujay
    Agrawal, Amit
    Ventrapati, Pradeep
    Prabhash, Kumar
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (05): : 1525 - 1534
  • [8] Hyperprogressive Disease in Cancers Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
    Shen, Pan
    Han, Liang
    Ba, Xin
    Qin, Kai
    Tu, Shenghao
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [9] Real-world data in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Narita, Yukiya
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S250 - S250
  • [10] Acute kidney injury in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a retrospective real-world study
    Lumlertgul, Nuttha
    Vassallo, Pietro
    Tydeman, Florence
    Lewis, Natasha
    Hobill, Abigail
    Weerapolchai, Kittisak
    Nordin, Nurul Zaynah
    Seylanova, Nina
    Martin, Luke
    Cennamo, Armando
    Wang, Yanzhong
    Rigg, Anne
    Shaunak, Nisha
    Ostermann, Marlies
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 191