Outcomes of single- vs two-stage primary joint arthroplasty for septic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose: Septic arthritis (SA) is an intra-articular infection caused by purulent bacteria and the only effective method is surgical intervention. Two-stage arthroplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for SA, but recent studies have found that single-stage arthroplasty can achieve the same efficacy as two-stage arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of single-vs two-stage arthroplasty in the treatment of (acute or quiescent) SA. Methods: The review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases to identify all literature on the treatment of SA using single-and two-stage arthroplasty from the date of database inception to November 10, 2022. Data on reinfection rates were expressed as odds ratios and 95% CIs. Results: Seven retrospective studies with a total of 413 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed no difference in the reinfection rate between single-and two-stage arthroplasty. Subgroup analysis found no difference between the single-and two-stage arthroplasty groups in the incidence of purulent infection of the hip and knee. Cumulative meta-analysis showed gradual stabilization of outcomes. Conclusions: Based on our meta-analysis of available retrospective studies, we found no significant difference in reinfection rates between single-and two-stage arthroplasty for SA. Further prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm our results, although our meta -analysis provides important insights into the current literature on this topic.