Modernism;
Nominalism;
Samuel Beckett;
Wallace Stevens;
David Jones;
Voluntarism;
D O I:
10.1093/litthe/frac034
中图分类号:
I0 [文学理论];
学科分类号:
0501 ;
050101 ;
摘要:
The idea that human language is an inherently inadequate instrument for grasping reality is widespread in modernist literature. While the 'radical nominalism' of this position has been recognised, this article argues that a genealogical understanding of its theological roots in medieval nominalism can highlight how modernist writers like Samuel Beckett and Wallace Stevens still wrestle with a voluntarist God of absolute and arbitrary power. By contrast, for a writer like David Jones, the historical choice of nominalism amounts to a theological mistake, and the modern artist needs to rediscover a God who consecrates and redeems the human capacity for sign-making.